Use when test web applications for HTTP Host header injection vulnerabilities
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill testing-for-host-header-injection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Testing For Host Header Injection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-testing-for-host-header-injection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: testing-for-host-header-injection
description: Use when test web applications for HTTP Host header injection vulnerabilities
to identify password reset poisoning, web cache poisoning, SSRF, and virtual host
routing manipulation risks. Use when testing web applications for http host header
injection vulnerabilities to.
domain: cybersecurity
tags:
- host-header-injection
- password-reset-poisoning
- cache-poisoning
- virtual-host
- web-security
- header-manipulation
- ssrf
subdomain: web-application-security
version: '1.0'
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- ID.RA-01
- PR.DS-10
- DE.CM-01
category: cybersecurity
---
# Testing For Host Header Injection
## Overview
Cybersecurity skill for testing for host header injection. Follows industry best practices and security standards.
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "testing for host header injection"
- "Test web applications for HTTP Host header injection vulnerabilities to identify"
- When testing password reset functionality for token theft via host manipulation
- During assessment of web caching behavior influenced by Host header values
- When testing virtual host routing and server-side request processing
- During penetration testing of applications behind reverse proxies or load balancers
- When evaluating SSRF potential through Host header manipulation
## When NOT to Use
- When you lack proper authorization for testing
- For production systems without change management
- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope
## Prerequisites
- Burp Suite for intercepting and modifying Host headers
- Understanding of HTTP Host header role in virtual hosting and routing
- Knowledge of alternative host headers (X-Forwarded-Host, X-Host, X-Original-URL)
- Access to an attacker-controlled domain for receiving poisoned requests
- Burp Collaborator or interact.sh for out-of-band detection
- Multiple test accounts for password reset testing
> **Legal Notice:** This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
## Workflow
```python
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
```
1. **Reconnaissance** — Gather information about the target related to . Identify attack surface.
2. **Vulnerability Identification** — Enumerate potential weaknesses using automated and manual techniques.
3. **Exploit Development/Selection** — Use host header injection to identify and test vulnerabilities.
4. **Execution** — Execute the test in a controlled manner with proper authorization.
5. **Post-Exploitation** — Document the impact and extent of successful exploitation.
6. **Reporting** — Write detailed findings with reproduction steps, impact assessment, and remediation guidance.
## Tools
- **host header injection** — Primary tool for this skill
- **Vulnerability Scanner** — Automated weakness identification
- **Exploitation Framework** — Controlled exploitation testing
- **Reporting Tool** — Findings documentation and tracking
## Process
1. **Design** — Define interface, identify patterns, plan implementation
1. **Implement** — Write code following existing conventions, add tests
1. **Verify** — Run tests, check integration, validate behavior
## Verification
- [ ] All procedures executed completely and documented
- [ ] Findings validated against multiple data sources
- [ ] False positives identified and filtered
- [ ] Results documented with evidence and timestamps
- [ ] Recommendations provided with risk-based prioritization
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!