Use when systematically testing web applications for broken access control
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill testing-for-broken-access-control --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Testing For Broken Access Control?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-testing-for-broken-access-control)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: testing-for-broken-access-control
description: Use when systematically testing web applications for broken access control
vulnerabilities including privilege escalation, missing function-level checks, and
insecure direct object references. Use when working with testing for broken access
control.
domain: cybersecurity
tags:
- penetration-testing
- access-control
- authorization
- owasp
- privilege-escalation
- web-security
subdomain: web-application-security
version: '1.0'
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- ID.RA-01
- PR.DS-10
- DE.CM-01
category: cybersecurity
---
# Testing For Broken Access Control
## Overview
Cybersecurity skill for testing for broken access control. Follows industry best practices and security standards.
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "testing for broken access control"
- "Systematically testing web applications for broken access control vulnerabilitie"
- During authorized penetration tests as the primary assessment for OWASP A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
- When evaluating role-based access control (RBAC) implementations across all application endpoints
- For testing multi-tenant applications where users in one organization should not access another's data
- When assessing API endpoints for missing or inconsistent authorization checks
- During security audits where privilege escalation and unauthorized access are primary concerns
## When NOT to Use
- When you lack proper authorization for testing
- For production systems without change management
- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope
## Prerequisites
- **Authorization**: Written penetration testing agreement for the target
- **Burp Suite Professional**: With Authorize extension for automated access control testing
- **Multiple test accounts**: Accounts at each role level (admin, manager, user, guest)
- **Application role matrix**: Documentation of what each role should and should not access
- **curl/httpie**: For manual endpoint testing with different authentication contexts
- **ffuf**: For discovering hidden endpoints that may lack access controls
## Workflow
```python
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
```
1. **Reconnaissance** — Gather information about the target related to . Identify attack surface.
2. **Vulnerability Identification** — Enumerate potential weaknesses using automated and manual techniques.
3. **Exploit Development/Selection** — Use broken access control to identify and test vulnerabilities.
4. **Execution** — Execute the test in a controlled manner with proper authorization.
5. **Post-Exploitation** — Document the impact and extent of successful exploitation.
6. **Reporting** — Write detailed findings with reproduction steps, impact assessment, and remediation guidance.
## Tools
- **broken access control** — Primary tool for this skill
- **Vulnerability Scanner** — Automated weakness identification
- **Exploitation Framework** — Controlled exploitation testing
- **Reporting Tool** — Findings documentation and tracking
## Process
1. **Design** — Define interface, identify patterns, plan implementation
1. **Implement** — Write code following existing conventions, add tests
1. **Verify** — Run tests, check integration, validate behavior
## Verification
- [ ] All procedures executed completely and documented
- [ ] Findings validated against multiple data sources
- [ ] False positives identified and filtered
- [ ] Results documented with evidence and timestamps
- [ ] Recommendations provided with risk-based prioritization
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!