Use when testing web applications for path traversal vulnerabilities
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill performing-directory-traversal-testing --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Performing Directory Traversal Testing?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-performing-directory-traversal-testing)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: performing-directory-traversal-testing
description: Use when testing web applications for path traversal vulnerabilities
that allow reading or writing arbitrary files on the server by manipulating file
path parameters. Use when working with performing directory traversal testing.
domain: cybersecurity
tags:
- penetration-testing
- directory-traversal
- path-traversal
- lfi
- owasp
- web-security
subdomain: web-application-security
version: '1.0'
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- ID.RA-01
- PR.DS-10
- DE.CM-01
category: cybersecurity
---
# Performing Directory Traversal Testing
## Overview
Cybersecurity skill for performing directory traversal testing. Follows industry best practices and security standards.
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "performing directory traversal testing"
- "Testing web applications for path traversal vulnerabilities that allow reading o"
- During authorized penetration tests when the application handles file paths in URL parameters or request bodies
- When testing file download, file view, or file include functionality
- For assessing Local File Inclusion (LFI) and Remote File Inclusion (RFI) vulnerabilities
- When evaluating template engines, logging systems, or report generators that reference files
- During security assessments of APIs that accept file names or paths as parameters
## When NOT to Use
- When you lack proper authorization for testing
- For production systems without change management
- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope
## Prerequisites
- **Authorization**: Written penetration testing agreement for the target
- **Burp Suite Professional**: For intercepting and modifying file path parameters
- **ffuf**: For fuzzing file path parameters with traversal payloads
- **dotdotpwn**: Automated directory traversal fuzzer (`apt install dotdotpwn`)
- **SecLists**: Traversal payload wordlists from Daniel Miessler's collection
- **curl**: For manual testing of traversal payloads
## Workflow
```python
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
```
1. **Plan Operations** — Define objectives, scope, and success criteria for directory traversal testing operations.
2. **Prepare Environment** — Set up tools, access, and data sources required for directory traversal testing.
3. **Execute Core Workflow** — Perform the directory traversal testing operations following established procedures.
4. **Validate Results** — Verify that results meet quality standards and objectives.
5. **Report Findings** — Document results, observations, and recommendations.
6. **Follow Up** — Track remediation actions and verify fixes where applicable.
## Tools
- **Analysis Platform** — Data processing and visualization
- **Collaboration Tools** — Team coordination and knowledge sharing
## Process
1. **Design** — Define interface, identify patterns, plan implementation
1. **Implement** — Write code following existing conventions, add tests
1. **Verify** — Run tests, check integration, validate behavior
## Verification
- [ ] All directory traversal testing procedures executed completely and documented
- [ ] Findings validated against multiple data sources
- [ ] False positives identified and filtered
- [ ] Results documented with evidence and timestamps
- [ ] Recommendations provided with risk-based prioritization
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!