Use when analyze and bypass Content Security Policy implementations to
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill performing-content-security-policy-bypass --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Performing Content Security Policy Bypass?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-performing-content-security-policy-bypass)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: performing-content-security-policy-bypass
description: Use when analyze and bypass Content Security Policy implementations to
achieve cross-site scripting by exploiting misconfigurations, JSONP endpoints, unsafe
directives, and policy injection techniques. Use when analyzeing and bypass content
security policy implementations to achieve cross-site.
domain: cybersecurity
tags:
- csp-bypass
- content-security-policy
- xss
- script-injection
- nonce-bypass
- jsonp
- policy-misconfiguration
subdomain: web-application-security
version: '1.0'
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- ID.RA-01
- PR.DS-10
- DE.CM-01
category: cybersecurity
---
# Performing Content Security Policy Bypass
## Overview
Cybersecurity skill for performing content security policy bypass. Follows industry best practices and security standards.
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "performing content security policy bypass"
- "Analyze and bypass Content Security Policy implementations to achieve cross-site"
- When XSS is found but execution is blocked by Content Security Policy
- During web application security assessments to evaluate CSP effectiveness
- When testing the robustness of CSP against known bypass techniques
- During bug bounty hunting where CSP prevents direct XSS exploitation
- When auditing CSP header configuration for security weaknesses
## When NOT to Use
- When you lack proper authorization for testing
- For production systems without change management
- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope
## Prerequisites
- Burp Suite for intercepting responses and analyzing CSP headers
- CSP Evaluator (Google) for automated policy analysis
- Understanding of CSP directives (script-src, default-src, style-src, etc.)
- Knowledge of CSP bypass techniques (JSONP, base-uri, object-src)
- Browser developer tools for CSP violation monitoring
- Collection of whitelisted domain JSONP endpoints
## Workflow
```python
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
```
1. **Plan Operations** — Define objectives, scope, and success criteria for content security policy bypass operations.
2. **Prepare Environment** — Set up tools, access, and data sources required for content security policy bypass.
3. **Execute Core Workflow** — Perform the content security policy bypass operations following established procedures.
4. **Validate Results** — Verify that results meet quality standards and objectives.
5. **Report Findings** — Document results, observations, and recommendations.
6. **Follow Up** — Track remediation actions and verify fixes where applicable.
## Tools
- **Analysis Platform** — Data processing and visualization
- **Collaboration Tools** — Team coordination and knowledge sharing
## Process
1. **Reconnaissance** — Gather target information, identify attack surface, enumerate services
1. **Analysis/Exploitation** — Execute the technique, analyze results, document findings
1. **Reporting** — Document IOCs, write findings, provide remediation recommendations
## Verification
- [ ] All content security policy bypass procedures executed completely and documented
- [ ] Findings validated against multiple data sources
- [ ] False positives identified and filtered
- [ ] Results documented with evidence and timestamps
- [ ] Recommendations provided with risk-based prioritization
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!