Use when knowledge graph-based persistent memory for AI agents — entities,
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill memory-knowledge-graph --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Memory Knowledge Graph?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-memory-knowledge-graph)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: memory-knowledge-graph
description: Use when knowledge graph-based persistent memory for AI agents — entities,
relations, and semantic retrieval. Use when working with memory knowledge graph.
domain: mcp
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
subdomain: mcp
tags:
- ai-agent
- graph
- knowledge
- mcp-server
- memory
- model-context-protocol
- tool-integration
version: 1.0.0
category: mcp
---
## Overview
Persistent memory system using knowledge graphs for AI agents. Stores entities, relations, and observations as a graph, enabling semantic retrieval and reasoning over accumulated knowledge.
## Capabilities
- Extract entities and relations from conversations and documents
- Store knowledge as a graph (nodes + edges + observations)
- Retrieve relevant knowledge via semantic search and graph traversal
- Consolidate and deduplicate knowledge over time
- Query knowledge with natural language
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "memory knowledge graph"
- "Knowledge graph-based persistent memory for AI agents — entities, relations, and"
- Building AI agents with long-term memory
- Need to remember user preferences, facts, and context across sessions
- Knowledge base that grows and improves over time
- Cross-referencing information across multiple sources
## When NOT to Use
- Task is outside your authorization scope
- You need to implement controls (use implementing-* skills)
- Task is about analysis, not action (use analyzing-* skills)
- You don't have access to target systems
- Task requires compliance expertise (consult professionals)
- Task is about defense, not offense (use defensive skills)
## Pseudo Code
```python
# Example workflow for this skill
def execute(input_data):
# Step 1: Validate input
if not input_data:
raise ValueError("Input data is required")
# Step 2: Process core logic
result = process(input_data)
# Step 3: Validate output
validate_output(result)
return result
```
### Entity Extraction
```python
def extract_entities(text):
prompt = f"""Extract entities and relations from:
{text}
Return JSON: {{"entities": [{{"name": "...", "type": "...", "observations": [...]}}], "relations": [{{"from": "...", "to": "...", "type": "..."}}]}}"""
return llm.generate(prompt)
```
### Knowledge Retrieval
```python
def retrieve_relevant(query, graph, top_k=5):
# 1. Semantic search on entity names and observations
semantic_results = graph.semantic_search(query, top_k=top_k)
# 2. Graph traversal - get connected entities
related = []
for entity in semantic_results:
related.extend(graph.get_neighbors(entity.id, depth=2))
# 3. Deduplicate and rank
return rank_by_relevance(semantic_results + related, query)
```
### Memory Consolidation
```python
def consolidate(graph):
# Merge duplicate entities
duplicates = find_similar_entities(graph, threshold=0.9)
for dup_group in duplicates:
merge_entities(graph, dup_group)
# Remove stale observations
for entity in graph.entities:
entity.observations = [o for o in entity.observations if o.relevance > 0.3]
```
## Common Patterns
- **Extract on every interaction**: Build knowledge from every conversation
- **Semantic + graph traversal**: Combine vector search with graph walks for better retrieval
- **Consolidate periodically**: Merge duplicates and prune stale knowledge
- **Entity types**: Person, Organization, Concept, Event, Preference
## How to Use
1. Invoke the skill when relevant domain keywords appear in the request
2. Provide required inputs as specified in the skill definition
3. Review the output for correctness before delivering to the user
4. Combine with related skills for complex multi-step workflows
## Verification
After completing this skill, confirm:
- [ ] Output meets the defined quality and completeness requirements
- [ ] All prerequisites are verified and documented
- [ ] Error handling covers edge cases
- [ ] Results are accurate and actionable
## Process
1. Analyze the task requirements
2. Apply domain expertise
3. Verify output quality
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I will just use curl" | MCP handles auth, retries, streaming, and type safety. Use the SDK. |
| "One mega-server is simpler" | Single-responsibility servers are easier to debug and maintain. |
| "MCP is just a wrapper" | MCP enables cross-platform tool sharing. It is infrastructure, not overhead. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!