Use when swiftUI development — declarative UI, state management, navigation,
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill ios-swiftui --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ios Swiftui?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-ios-swiftui)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ios-swiftui
description: Use when swiftUI development — declarative UI, state management, navigation,
and Apple ecosystem integration. Use when working with ios swiftui.
domain: development
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
subdomain: software-development
tags:
- coding
- ios
- software-engineering
- swiftui
- testing
version: 1.0.0
category: development
---
## Overview
SwiftUI for building native iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS apps. Covers declarative UI, state management, navigation, Core Data, and Apple ecosystem integration.
## Capabilities
- Build declarative UIs with SwiftUI views and modifiers
- Implement state management (@State, @Binding, @Observable)
- Design navigation with NavigationStack and NavigationLink
- Integrate with Core Data, HealthKit, and Apple services
- Submit to App Store via TestFlight
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "ios swiftui"
- "SwiftUI development — declarative UI, state management, navigation, and Apple ec"
- Building native iOS/macOS apps
- Need deep Apple ecosystem integration (HealthKit, CarPlay, widgets)
- Target iOS 16+ for modern SwiftUI features
- Team has Swift experience
## When NOT to Use
- Task is about deployment, not development (use deploy skills)
- Task is about code review, not writing (use review skills)
- You need to understand existing code first (use research skills)
- Task is about testing only (use test skills)
- Requirements are unclear (clarify first)
- Task is trivially simple (single line fix)
## Pseudo Code
The ios-swiftui workflow follows a standard pipeline pattern.
Core flow:
```
# ios-swiftui primary flow
input = prepare(raw_data)
result = process(input, config={apple, declarative, development, ecosystem, integration})
validate(result)
deliver(result)
```
Error handling:
```
on error:
log(error_details)
retry_with_backoff(max=3)
if still_failing: alert_and_escalate()
```
### SwiftUI View
```swift
struct ContentView: View {
@State private var items: [Item] = []
var body: some View {
NavigationStack {
List(items) { item in
NavigationLink(item.name) {
DetailView(item: item)
}
}
.navigationTitle("Items")
.task { await loadItems() }
}
}
func loadItems() async {
items = try? await APIService.fetchItems()
}
}
```
### Observable Pattern
```swift
@Observable
class ItemStore {
var items: [Item] = []
func fetch() async throws {
items = try await APIService.fetchItems()
}
}
```
## Common Patterns
- **@Observable**: Use the new @Observable macro (iOS 17+) over ObservableObject
- **NavigationStack**: Use NavigationStack over NavigationView (deprecated)
- **Task modifier**: Use .task {} for async loading instead of .onAppear
- **PreviewProvider**: Always include previews for rapid development
## How to Use
1. Understand the requirement and existing codebase patterns
2. Design the solution with error handling and testability in mind
3. Implement incrementally with tests for each change
4. Verify against expected outcomes (manual and automated)
5. Document usage, edge cases, and integration points
6. Review with team before merging to shared branches
## Red Flags
- **Skipping tests to ship faster**: Untested code breaks in production when you least expect it
- **No error handling in production code**: Unhandled errors crash services and lose user data
- **Hardcoded configuration values**: Hardcoded values prevent environment switching and leak secrets
- **Ignoring security implications**: Missing input validation, auth bypasses, and injection vulnerabilities
- **Over-engineering simple solutions**: Premature abstraction adds complexity without proportional benefit
## Verification
- [ ] Skill output matches expected behavior
## Process
1. Analyze the task requirements
2. Apply domain expertise
3. Verify output quality
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Tests slow me down" | Bugs slow you down 10x more. Tests are speed, not overhead. |
| "I will refactor later" | Technical debt compounds. Refactor as you go. |
| "It works on my machine" | If it is not in CI, it does not work. Ship proof, not claims. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!