Use when systematically collects, categorizes, and distributes indicators
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill collecting-indicators-of-compromise --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Collecting Indicators Of Compromise?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-collecting-indicators-of-compromise)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: collecting-indicators-of-compromise
description: Use when systematically collects, categorizes, and distributes indicators
of compromise (IOCs) during and after security incidents to enable detection, blocking,
and threat intelligence sharing. Covers network, host, email, and behavioral indicators
using STIX/TAXII formats and threat intelligence platforms. Activates for requests
involving IOC collection, indicator extraction, threat indicator sharing, compromise
indicators, STIX export, or IOC enrichment.
domain: cybersecurity
tags:
- IOC-collection
- threat-indicators
- STIX-TAXII
- MISP
- threat-intelligence-sharing
subdomain: incident-response
mitre_attack:
- T1071
- T1059
- T1547
- T1053
version: 1.0.0
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- RS.MA-01
- RS.MA-02
- RS.AN-03
- RC.RP-01
category: cybersecurity
---
# Collecting Indicators Of Compromise
## Overview
Cybersecurity skill for collecting indicators of compromise. Follows industry best practices and security standards.
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "collecting indicators of compromise"
- "Systematically collects, categorizes, and distributes indicators of compromise ("
- During active incident response to identify and block adversary infrastructure
- Post-incident to document all observed adversary artifacts for future detection
- When sharing threat intelligence with ISACs, sector partners, or law enforcement
- When building detection rules in SIEM, EDR, or network security tools
- When enriching IOCs with threat intelligence context for risk scoring
**Do not use** for behavioral TTP analysis without accompanying technical indicators; use MITRE ATT&CK mapping for behavioral characterization.
## When NOT to Use
- When you lack proper authorization for testing
- For production systems without change management
- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope
## Prerequisites
- Access to incident evidence sources: SIEM logs, EDR telemetry, memory dumps, disk images, network captures
- Threat intelligence platform (MISP, OpenCTI, ThreatConnect) for IOC management and sharing
- IOC enrichment tools: VirusTotal, OTX (AlienVault Open Threat Exchange), Shodan, DomainTools
- STIX 2.1 knowledge for structured IOC representation
- Sharing agreements with relevant ISACs (FS-ISAC, H-ISAC, IT-ISAC) or sector partners
## Workflow
```python
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
```
1. **Define Objectives** — Clarify the goals and scope for indicators of compromise.
2. **Gather Resources** — Collect tools, data, and access needed for indicators of compromise.
3. **Execute Process** — Carry out indicators of compromise operations methodically.
4. **Verify Quality** — Check results against acceptance criteria.
5. **Document Outcomes** — Record findings, decisions, and next steps.
## Tools
- **Analysis Platform** — Data processing and visualization
- **Collaboration Tools** — Team coordination and knowledge sharing
## Process
1. **Prepare** — Gather requirements, verify prerequisites, set up environment
1. **Execute** — Run collecting indicators of compromise workflow with configured parameters
1. **Verify** — Validate output meets requirements, document results
## Verification
- [ ] All indicators of compromise procedures executed completely and documented
- [ ] Findings validated against multiple data sources
- [ ] False positives identified and filtered
- [ ] Results documented with evidence and timestamps
- [ ] Recommendations provided with risk-based prioritization
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!