Use when detect sandbox evasion techniques in malware samples by analyzing
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill analyzing-malware-sandbox-evasion-techniques --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Analyzing Malware Sandbox Evasion Techniques?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oyi77-analyzing-malware-sandbox-evasion-techniques)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: analyzing-malware-sandbox-evasion-techniques
description: Use when detect sandbox evasion techniques in malware samples by analyzing
timing checks, VM artifact queries, user interaction detection, and sleep inflation
patterns from Cuckoo/AnyRun behavioral reports. Use when detecting sandbox evasion
techniques in malware samples by analyzing timing.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: malware-analysis
tags:
- sandbox-evasion
- malware-analysis
- cuckoo
- anyrun
- mitre-attack
- virtualization-detection
- behavioral-analysis
version: '1.0'
author: oyi77
license: Apache-2.0
d3fend_techniques:
- Platform Hardening
- Restore Object
- Process Analysis
- System Call Filtering
- Restore Software
nist_csf:
- DE.AE-02
- RS.AN-03
- ID.RA-01
- DE.CM-01
category: cybersecurity
---
# Analyzing Malware Sandbox Evasion Techniques
## Overview
Sandbox evasion (MITRE ATT&CK T1497) allows malware to detect analysis environments and alter behavior to avoid detection. This skill analyzes behavioral reports from Cuckoo Sandbox and AnyRun for evasion indicators including timing-based checks (GetTickCount, QueryPerformanceCounter, sleep inflation), VM artifact detection (registry keys, MAC address prefixes, process names like vmtoolsd.exe), user interaction checks (mouse movement, keyboard input), and environment fingerprinting (disk size, CPU count, RAM). Detection rules flag samples exhibiting these behaviors for deeper manual analysis.
## When to Use
**Trigger phrases:**
- "analyzing malware sandbox evasion techniques"
- "Detect sandbox evasion techniques in malware samples by analyzing timing checks,"
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing malware sandbox evasion techniques
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
## Prerequisites
- Cuckoo Sandbox 2.0+ or AnyRun account for behavioral analysis reports
- Python 3.8+ with json library for report parsing
- Behavioral report exports in JSON format
## Steps
```python
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
```
1. Parse Cuckoo/AnyRun behavioral report JSON files
2. Extract API call sequences for timing-related functions
3. Identify VM artifact detection via registry queries and WMI calls
4. Detect sleep inflation by comparing requested vs actual sleep durations
5. Flag user interaction checks (GetCursorPos, GetAsyncKeyState patterns)
6. Score evasion sophistication based on technique count and diversity
7. Map detected techniques to MITRE ATT&CK T1497 sub-techniques
## Expected Output
JSON report listing detected evasion techniques with MITRE ATT&CK mapping, API call evidence, evasion sophistication score, and classification of evasion categories (timing, VM detection, user interaction, environment fingerprinting).
## When NOT to Use
- You need to perform the attack, not analyze it (use performing-* skills)
- Task is about detection, not analysis (use detecting-* skills)
- You need to implement controls (use implementing-* skills)
- Task is about threat hunting, not post-incident analysis (use hunting-* skills)
- You don't have access to the artifacts/logs to analyze
- Task requires real-time monitoring (use SOC tools)
## Red Flags
- Performing actions without explicit written authorization from the asset owner
- Testing against production systems without a defined scope and rules of engagement
- Analyzing malware on a machine connected to the production network
- Failing to isolate the analysis environment from the internet
- Executing samples without proper containment (VM, sandbox)
## Process
1. **Reconnaissance** — Gather target information, identify attack surface, enumerate services
1. **Analysis/Exploitation** — Execute the technique, analyze results, document findings
1. **Reporting** — Document IOCs, write findings, provide remediation recommendations
## Verification
- All steps executed successfully against a test environment before production use
- Output documented with screenshots or logs demonstrating expected behavior
- Sample hash recorded and verified (MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256)
- Analysis environment confirmed isolated from production network
- Indicators of compromise (IOCs) extracted and documented
## Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!