Skip to content
Back to skills

Contract Driven

ASecurity

Use when crossing a public API boundary, guarding complex invariants, or hardening untrusted input or integration seams. Not for remote or irreversible changes.

  • 52 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 3, 2026
ai-agentsrustapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 20, 2026

npx -y skills add OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development --skill contract-driven --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Contract Driven?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Contract Driven
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/outlinedriven-contract-driven-outline-driven-development/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/outlinedriven-contract-driven-outline-driven-development)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: contract-driven
description: 'Use when crossing a public API boundary, guarding complex invariants, or hardening untrusted input or integration seams. Not for remote or irreversible changes.'
---

# Contract-driven

## Contract

| Field | Bound contract |
|---|---|
| Trigger | Crossing a public API boundary, guarding complex invariants, or hardening untrusted input or integration seams. |
| Authority | Reversible local: writes only named local types, assertions, validators, and tests at contract boundaries; rollback is undo (delete the added code or revert the boundary change). No remote mutation. |
| Side effect | Adds or refines local types, assertions, validators, and tests at contract boundaries. |
| Done | Every planned contract is implemented at the appropriate static/test/debug/runtime layer and violations fail explicitly at the boundary. |

## Inputs

Required:

- The requirements or specification for the operation whose contract is being designed.
- The target source file or module containing the public API boundary, invariant, or untrusted seam.

Optional:

- Existing tests that must continue to pass.

## Procedure

1. Plan: extract PRE/POST/INV from the requirements. Give each contract an ID and a one-line description (e.g. PRE-1: amount > 0; POST-1: balance == old(balance) - amount; INV-1: balance >= 0). Do not begin implementation until every planned contract has an ID. Done when: every planned contract has an ID and a one-line description.
2. Select verification level: choose the strongest layer that can enforce each contract, preferring static over runtime:
   - Static type system or static_assert for type size, alignment, null/type safety, and exhaustiveness.
   - Test assertions for expensive O(n)+ properties.
   - Debug-only invariants for internal invariants.
   - Runtime guards for public API input, and always for external or untrusted input.
   If a property can be verified statically, do not add a runtime contract.
   Done when: every contract has a selected verification level, static preferred over runtime.
3. Create: implement every PRE, POST, INV at its chosen level in the target local code. Runtime contracts, where used, must be active and not compiled out or disabled. Done when: every contract is implemented at its chosen level and runtime contracts are active.
4. Verify: run the type checker, static analysis, and build. Contracts must compile and lint. Done when: the type checker, static analysis, and build pass with all contracts.
5. Test: write one violation test per PRE/POST/INV proving the contract catches bad input or bad state. Static contracts are verified by the type checker; runtime contracts by violation tests that assert the boundary fails explicitly. Done when: one violation test per contract passes, proving the boundary fails on bad input or state.

## Failure and recovery
- Contract lint or build fails: fix the contract or implementation; do not disable or compile out the runtime contract to make it pass.
- A violation test does not fire: the contract is not enforced at the chosen layer; re-select the layer or strengthen the check; never delete the test to make it pass.
- A contract restates the implementation trivially (e.g. ensures(result == x - y) for subtract(x, y)): delete that contract; it is contract fatigue, not a boundary guarantee.
- Partial result: if some contracts cannot be implemented because a requirement is missing, stop and report the missing requirement; do not invent contracts or widen scope.
- Rollback: delete the added local types, assertions, validators, or tests, or revert the boundary change; no remote, credential, published, or deployed artifact is touched.

## Output
Local code with every planned PRE/POST/INV contract implemented at its verification layer, plus one violation test per contract. Violations fail explicitly at the boundary. Each contract traces to a requirement by ID.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml189 B
  • references/examples.md3.7 KB
  • references/libraries.md1.5 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.