Skip to content
Back to skills

Grace Verification

ASecurity

Design and maintain GRACE 4 verification entries, commands, scenarios, markers, and assertion evidence under .grace/verification.

  • 248 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 5, 2026
ai-agents

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 5, 2026

npx -y skills add osovv/grace-marketplace --skill grace-verification --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Grace Verification?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Grace Verification
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/osovv-grace-verification-grace-marketplace/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/osovv-grace-verification-grace-marketplace)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: grace-verification
description: Design and maintain GRACE 4 verification entries, commands, scenarios, markers, and assertion evidence under .grace/verification.
---

<skill>
<purpose>
Strengthen deterministic verification for modules and changes. Verification state lives in `.grace/verification/index.xml` and routed verification documents. Each durable module should have deterministic `V-M-*` coverage unless an explicit exception is planned.
</purpose>

<workflow>
1. Read relevant `.grace/graph` anchors and current `V-M-*` entries.
2. Identify scenarios, commands, test files, required log markers, and trace assertions.
3. Ensure commands are deterministic and runnable from the project root or documented cwd.
4. Update or propose `.grace/verification` changes through the active change plan.
5. Run the commands and record fresh evidence in the response.
</workflow>
<cwd_contract>
When verification commands run from a workspace or package directory, add one direct `<Cwd>relative/project/path</Cwd>` child to the owning `V-M-*` entry. Keep declared `<TestFiles><File>...</File></TestFiles>` paths project-root-relative; the CLI uses `Cwd` only to compare them with cwd-relative command arguments.
</cwd_contract>
<evidence_contract>
Use `<Marker>` when module health must prove a runtime log or trace emission from linked implementation code. Use `<TraceAssertion>` for deterministic test or trace evidence that does not require runtime logging, such as pure functions, type-level modules, and core libraries. A non-empty marker or trace assertion satisfies the module-health evidence requirement; only authored markers require matching runtime emission and `BLOCK_*` evidence.
</evidence_contract>
<gate_task_contract>
Reference named project tasks in `MustPassCommand` and `ExpectedCommand` (for example `bun run gate:e2e`) instead of inline `;`-chains. Decompose full gates into granular named tasks (`gate:test`, `gate:typecheck`, `gate:build`, `gate:e2e`) so a selective re-run is just running that task, timeouts map to one coherent unit, and `grace lint --run-commands` reports each gate step with its own timing and log.
</gate_task_contract>
<flake_contract>
A flaky gate is a defect of the verification entry, not a reason to re-run blindly. Diagnose from the per-attempt logs under `~/.cache/grace/run-commands/`. Fix it by decomposing the gate task, adding runner-level retries inside the task itself (for example playwright `--retries`), or quarantining the unstable scenario. Silent manual re-runs are not a fix: grace records every run honestly, and nondeterministic verification undermines assertion evidence.
</flake_contract>
</skill>

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml146 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.