Skip to content
Back to skills

Identify Assumptions Existing

ASecurity

Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 16, 2026
ai-agentsgotestingperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 16, 2026

npx -y skills add Osama-Alzahrani-UQU/OmniAgentic --skill identify-assumptions-existing --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Identify Assumptions Existing?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Identify Assumptions Existing
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/osama-alzahrani-uqu-identify-assumptions-existing/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/osama-alzahrani-uqu-identify-assumptions-existing)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: identify-assumptions-existing
description: Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea
---
## Identify Assumptions (Existing Product)

Devil's advocate analysis to surface risky assumptions across four risk areas.

### Context

You are stress-testing a feature idea for **$ARGUMENTS**.

If the user provides files (designs, PRDs, research), read them first.

### Instructions

The user will describe their product, objective, market segment, and feature idea. Work through these steps:

1. **Think from three perspectives** about why this feature might fail:
   - **Product Manager perspective**: Business viability, market fit, strategic alignment
   - **Designer perspective**: Usability, user experience, adoption barriers
   - **Engineer perspective**: Technical feasibility, performance, integration challenges

2. **Identify assumptions across four risk areas**:
   - **Value**: Will it create value for customers? Does it solve a real problem?
   - **Usability**: Will users figure out how to use it? Is the learning curve acceptable?
   - **Viability**: Can marketing, sales, finance, and legal support it?
   - **Feasibility**: Can it be built with existing technology? Are there integration risks?

3. **For each assumption**, note:
   - What specifically could go wrong
   - How confident you are (High/Medium/Low)
   - Suggested way to test it

Think step by step. Be thorough but constructive — the goal is to strengthen the idea, not kill it.

---

### Further Reading

- [Assumption Prioritization Canvas: How to Identify And Test The Right Assumptions](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/assumption-prioritization-canvas)
- [How to Manage Risks as a Product Manager](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/how-to-manage-risks-as-a-product-manager)
- [Continuous Product Discovery Masterclass (CPDM)](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/cpdm) (video course)

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.