Build bridges between A2A and MCP — wrap A2A agents as MCP tools, use MCP tools from A2A agents, and architect hybrid multi-agent systems. Use when integrating A2A agent-to-agent communication with MCP tool access.
Scanned 9/7/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add OrcaQubits/agentic-commerce-skills-plugins --skill a2a-mcp-bridge --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of A2a Mcp Bridge?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/orcaqubits-a2a-mcp-bridge-agentic-commerce-skills-plugin)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: a2a-mcp-bridge
description: Build bridges between A2A and MCP — wrap A2A agents as MCP tools, use MCP tools from A2A agents, and architect hybrid multi-agent systems. Use when integrating A2A agent-to-agent communication with MCP tool access.
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, WebSearch, WebFetch
---
# A2A + MCP Bridge
## Before writing code
**Fetch live docs**:
1. Fetch `https://a2a-protocol.org/latest/specification/` for the A2A protocol details
2. Web-search `a2a mcp integration bridge agent tool` for patterns combining the two protocols
3. Web-search `site:github.com a2aproject A2A MCP` for any official A2A-MCP integration examples
4. Web-search `site:modelcontextprotocol.io specification` for the latest MCP specification
## Conceptual Architecture
### A2A vs MCP — Complementary Protocols
| Aspect | A2A | MCP |
|--------|-----|-----|
| **Purpose** | Agent-to-agent delegation | Agent-to-tool/data access |
| **Participants** | Agents (opaque, autonomous) | Agent + tool server (transparent) |
| **Communication** | Tasks with messages | Tool calls with structured I/O |
| **State** | Long-lived tasks with lifecycle | Stateless tool invocations |
| **Discovery** | Agent Cards | Server manifests |
| **Transport** | JSON-RPC over HTTP | JSON-RPC over stdio/HTTP+SSE |
### Why Bridge Them
Real-world multi-agent systems need both:
- **A2A** for delegating complex, open-ended work to other agents
- **MCP** for accessing specific tools, databases, APIs, and data sources
Bridging patterns enable agents to participate in both ecosystems.
### Bridge Patterns
#### Pattern 1: A2A Agent Wrapping MCP Tools
An A2A agent that internally uses MCP tools to fulfill tasks.
```
Client Agent → (A2A) → Bridge Agent → (MCP) → Tool Server
```
- Client sends a task via A2A
- Bridge agent interprets the task
- Bridge agent calls MCP tools to gather data/perform actions
- Bridge agent composes the result and returns via A2A
#### Pattern 2: MCP Tool Wrapping an A2A Agent
An MCP tool that delegates work to an A2A agent.
```
Agent → (MCP tool call) → MCP Server → (A2A) → Specialist Agent
```
- Agent calls an MCP tool
- MCP server sends a task to a specialist A2A agent
- A2A agent processes and returns
- MCP server returns the result as tool output
#### Pattern 3: Hybrid Orchestrator
A coordinator agent that uses both A2A and MCP:
```
Orchestrator Agent
├── (A2A) → Research Agent
├── (A2A) → Writing Agent
├── (MCP) → Database Tool
└── (MCP) → Search Tool
```
### Implementation Considerations
**A2A agent using MCP tools:**
- The agent's handler connects to MCP servers as part of its processing
- MCP tool calls happen inside the `working` state
- Results from MCP tools inform the A2A task response
- The A2A client doesn't know or care that MCP is used internally
**MCP tool wrapping A2A agent:**
- MCP tool definition describes what the A2A agent can do
- Tool handler creates an A2A task, waits for completion
- Map A2A task failures to MCP tool errors
- Handle A2A multi-turn by either auto-responding or failing with a message
**State mapping:**
- A2A tasks are long-lived; MCP tool calls are short-lived
- For synchronous MCP tools wrapping A2A, block until the A2A task completes
- For async scenarios, consider returning a task ID and providing a status-check tool
### Architecture Guidelines
- Keep the bridge layer thin — don't add unnecessary abstraction
- Clearly document which protocol each component uses
- Handle timeout mismatches (MCP tools typically expect fast responses; A2A tasks can be long)
- Map error codes between protocols appropriately
- Log cross-protocol calls for debugging
### Best Practices
- Use A2A for delegation to autonomous agents, MCP for accessing deterministic tools
- Don't wrap simple tool calls as A2A agents — use MCP directly
- Don't use MCP for complex, multi-turn agent interactions — use A2A
- Consider the latency implications of cross-protocol bridges
- Test the bridge with realistic payloads and error scenarios
- Document the agent topology so developers understand the flow
Fetch the latest A2A specification and MCP specification for current schemas and integration guidance before implementing bridges.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!