Skip to content
Back to skills

Governance

ASecurity

Manage openEHR specification governance: releases, change requests (CR/PR), versioning, and lifecycle states (Planning, Development, Trial, Stable, Paused, Retired). This skill should be used when the user asks to create, tag, or fix a release, update release entries in `manifest.json`, raise or progress a CR/PR, promote a spec's status, propose a new spec, or explain the SEC change process. Not for amendment entries (amendment-record), pre-release document review (review), local previews (au...

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 9, 2026
ai-agentsgoexpressgitdocumentation

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 9, 2026

npx -y skills add openEHR/ai-plugins --skill governance --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Governance?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Governance
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/openehr-governance/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/openehr-governance)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: governance
description: >
  Manage openEHR specification governance: releases, change requests (CR/PR), versioning, and
  lifecycle states (Planning, Development, Trial, Stable, Paused, Retired). This skill should be
  used when the user asks to create, tag, or fix a release, update release entries in
  `manifest.json`, raise or progress a CR/PR, promote a spec's status, propose a new spec, or
  explain the SEC change process. Not for amendment entries (amendment-record), pre-release
  document review (review), local previews (authoring), or clinical/archetype governance.
---

# openEHR Specification Governance

This skill covers the change process, release management, and lifecycle governance for
openEHR specifications. It is based on the official governance documents at
specifications.openehr.org/governance.

## Related Skills

- **authoring** — document scaffolding, repo layout, boilerplate structure
- **amendment-record** — detailed amendment record authoring conventions
- **review** — pre-release quality review of spec documents (the `spec-reviewer` and `xref-auditor` subagents run it across a whole spec or component)

## Specification Lifecycle States

Every specification follows a formal lifecycle:

```
Planning → Development → Trial → Stable
                                    ↓
                                  Paused → Retired
```

| State | Duration | Format | Versioning | Change Management |
|-------|----------|--------|------------|-------------------|
| **Planning** | 6 months max | Wiki | 0.y.z | Informal |
| **Development** | 18 months max | Wiki | 0.y.z | Optional CRs |
| **Trial** | 2 years max | HTML + computable | x.y.z | Formal CRs |
| **Stable** | Unbounded | HTML + computable | x.y.z | Formal CRs |
| **Paused** | Unbounded | HTML + computable | paused | CRs only for state changes |
| **Retired** | Unbounded | Frozen version | n/a | None |

The Specifications Editorial Committee (SEC) reviews promotion criteria three months before
target dates. Unmet criteria may trigger a single three-month extension; subsequent failure
results in retirement.

The `spec_status` field in `manifest.json` and `manifest_vars.adoc` carries this state in upper case (for example `DEVELOPMENT`, `TRIAL`, `STABLE`, `PAUSED`, `RETIRED`; the full list is in `../authoring/references/manifest-spec-entry.md`). Keep both copies identical. To promote a spec, confirm that the SEC has approved the promotion, then set `spec_status` identically in both files.

## Versioning

openEHR uses three-part semantic versioning (`x.y.z`):

- **Patch (z)**: Error corrections and minor additions that do not change semantics
- **Minor (y)**: Significant additions that do not change existing semantics
- **Major (x)**: Semantic changes requiring potential software upgrades or data migration

Documentation-only corrections (typos, clarifications) receive a revision number update
without triggering a new release number.

## Artifact Types

### Problem Reports (PRs)

- Raised by **anyone** on the public `SPECPR` Jira tracker
- Document issues, bugs, or requirements against existing specifications
- The SEC reviews PRs every three months
- Reference format in specs: `{spec_tickets}/SPECPR-NNN[SPECPR-NNN^]`

### Change Requests (CRs)

- Created **only by SEC members** on component-specific Jira trackers (e.g., `SPECRM`, `SPECAM`)
- Each CR documents a specific modification to one or more specifications
- CRs reference the PRs they address
- Reference format in specs: `{spec_tickets}/SPECRM-NNN[SPECRM-NNN^]`
- If the user is not an SEC member, direct them to raise a PR on the `SPECPR` tracker instead

## Change Request Lifecycle

### 1. Creation
A CR requires: title, description, problem statement or PR references, affected component(s).

### 2. Acceptance
The SEC determines if the CR addresses real needs. Accepted CRs receive:
- Completion target date
- Work estimate (days)
- Assigned **Change Owner** (the component maintainer or designee)
- Priority: minor, major, or critical

### 3. Work Execution

**Minor changes** (single-document, no semantic impact):
- Edit directly on the working branch
- Generate publication formats for review

**Major changes** (cross-cutting or semantic):
- Create a development branch
- Track progress on a dedicated wiki page
- 30-day open community review period required before approval

### 4. Approval

**Minor changes:**
- Component Maintainer reviews
- Pass → commit to specification library
- Fail → one week to revise (max 3 rounds, then rejected)

**Major changes:**
- 30-day community review on Discourse specifications forum
- Assignee revises within two weeks based on feedback
- Two-thirds SEC majority vote required
- Max 3 review rounds, then rejected

### 5. Community Requirement

From Release 1.0 onward, specification changes (excluding documentation-only text updates)
must be announced on the Discourse specifications forum, and require implementation in at
least one formal software, schema, or technical expression before adoption.

## Release Process

Releases organize changes by component. The SEC defines release identifiers and delivery
dates, allocating CRs to releases.

### Release Naming

- Releases: `Release-N.N.N` (e.g., `Release-1.0.4`)
- Fix releases: `Release-N.N.NvM` (e.g., `Release-1.0.4v1`) — for post-release corrections

### Steps to Create a Release

Read `references/release-checklist.md` for the full step-by-step checklist.

The high-level process:

1. **Jira** (a user task, not doable from the repo): ask the user to confirm that all CRs and PRs for the release are closed and the saved searches exist, then continue.
2. **manifest.json**: Set the release date, verify `spec_status` for each spec, ensure Jira links are correct, and prepend the next-cycle `releases` entry with an empty `date`.
3. **Git**: Create a release branch (`Release-N.N.N`), publish in release mode with the exact command in the checklist (do not use `/openehr-specs:publish`; it builds previews only), commit, and create the annotated tag. Ask the user before pushing.
4. **Webhook**: The push triggers the specifications.openehr.org server to pull and deploy.

### Steps to Fix a Release

Follow the Fix Release section of `references/release-checklist.md`.

## Creating a New Specification

New specifications are proposed via PR or CR. The SEC verifies:
- Identifier assignment (the `id` field)
- Structural placement within the specification library
- Scope consistency with existing specifications
- Component location

To scaffold the document and its `manifest.json` entry once identifier and placement are agreed,
follow the **authoring** skill ("Creating a New Specification Document").

### Required Structure

All specifications must include:
- Front matter: identifier, version, amendments, copyright
- Introduction: purpose, related documents, status, tools, change history
- Main content
- References
- Internationalization considerations (where relevant)

### Entry Paths

1. **Mature external offering**: SEC assesses maturity; may start at Trial or Stable
2. **New development**: Starts at Planning state with 0.y.z versioning

## Roles

| Role | Responsibility |
|------|---------------|
| **SEC** (Specifications Editorial Committee) | Reviews all changes, accepts/rejects CRs, manages release allocation, promotes specs |
| **Component Maintainer** | Supervises component specs, assigns Change Owners, approves minor changes |
| **Change Owner** | Develops impact assessments, executes work, revises based on feedback |
| **Community** | Raises PRs, participates in open reviews on Discourse |

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md7.5 KB
  • references/release-checklist.md3.2 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.