Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add open-gsd/gsd-core --skill gsd-add-tests --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gsd Add Tests?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/open-gsd-gsd-add-tests)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gsd-add-tests
description: "Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation"
argument-hint: "<phase> [additional instructions]"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- Bash
- Glob
- Grep
- Agent
- AskUserQuestion
---
<objective>
Generate unit and E2E tests for a completed phase, using its SUMMARY.md, CONTEXT.md, and VERIFICATION.md as specifications.
Analyzes implementation files, classifies them into TDD (unit), E2E (browser), or Skip categories, presents a test plan for user approval, then generates tests following RED-GREEN conventions.
Output: Test files committed with message `test(phase-{N}): add unit and E2E tests from add-tests command`
</objective>
<execution_context>
@~/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/add-tests.md
</execution_context>
<context>
Phase: $ARGUMENTS
@.planning/STATE.md
@.planning/ROADMAP.md
</context>
<process>
Execute end-to-end.
Preserve all workflow gates (classification approval, test plan approval, RED-GREEN verification, gap reporting).
</process>
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...