Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Reddit Analyzer

ASecurity

Analyze Reddit threads for sentiment, consensus opinions, top arguments, and discussion patterns. Use this when users want to understand Reddit community opinions, analyze discussions, or gather insights from subreddit conversations.

282 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 6/6/2026
ai-agentsrustgoreactperformance

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/6/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add OneWave-AI/claude-skills --skill reddit-analyzer --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Reddit Analyzer?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Reddit Analyzer
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/onewave-ai-reddit-analyzer/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/onewave-ai-reddit-analyzer)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: reddit-thread-analyzer
description: Analyze Reddit threads for sentiment, consensus opinions, top arguments, and discussion patterns. Use this when users want to understand Reddit community opinions, analyze discussions, or gather insights from subreddit conversations.
---

# Reddit Thread Analyzer

Extract deep insights from Reddit discussions including sentiment, key arguments, and community consensus.

When a user provides a Reddit thread URL or asks about Reddit opinions, analyze the discussion comprehensively to surface meaningful patterns and insights.

## Instructions

### 1. Fetch and Parse Thread Data

Use WebFetch to load the Reddit thread and extract:
- Post title, body, author, score, and timestamp
- All comments (not just top-level)
- Comment scores, awards, and timestamps
- Note verified contributors or expert flair

### 2. Analyze Overall Sentiment

Determine the dominant sentiment and emotional tone:
- **Overall sentiment**: Positive, negative, neutral, or mixed
- **Sentiment distribution**: Approximate percentages
- **Emotional tone**: Excited, frustrated, skeptical, supportive, angry, enthusiastic
- **Shift over time**: Note if sentiment changes throughout discussion

### 3. Extract Key Arguments

Identify the most impactful points:

**Top Arguments in Favor** (3-5 points):
- Quote the argument
- Note comment score
- Identify supporting evidence or reasoning

**Top Arguments Against** (3-5 points):
- Quote the argument
- Note comment score
- Identify counter-points and rebuttals

**Expert or Verified Opinions**:
- Highlight comments from verified experts
- Note OP responses and clarifications

### 4. Find Consensus Points

Determine what the community agrees on:
- Points with broad agreement (high scores, no controversy)
- Emerging patterns across multiple comments
- Common ground between opposing viewpoints

### 5. Identify Controversial Topics

Flag heavily debated points:
- Topics with mixed upvotes/downvotes
- Arguments that sparked long comment chains
- Divisive issues where community is split

### 6. Provide Structured Analysis

Format your analysis clearly:

```markdown
# Reddit Analysis: [Thread Title]

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of the discussion and main takeaway]

## Overall Sentiment
- **Dominant Sentiment**: Positive/Negative/Neutral/Mixed (X%)
- **Emotional Tone**: [excited/frustrated/skeptical/etc.]
- **Community Alignment**: High/Medium/Low

## Top Arguments

### In Favor
1. **[Main point]** (+XXX score)
   > "[Direct quote from comment]"
   - [Brief explanation of reasoning]

2. **[Main point]** (+XXX score)
   > "[Direct quote]"

### Against
1. **[Main point]** (+XXX score)
   > "[Direct quote]"

## Community Consensus
- ✅ [Point most people agree on]
- ✅ [Another consensus point]

## Controversial Topics
- ⚠️ [Divisive issue] - Community split roughly 50/50
- ⚠️ [Another debate point]

## Notable Insights
- **Expert Opinion**: [Quote from verified expert] (+XXX)
- **Surprising Take**: [Unexpected perspective that gained traction]
- **Most Helpful**: [Most practical or actionable advice]

## Key Quotes
> "[Memorable quote]" - u/username (+XXX score)
> "[Another impactful quote]" - u/username (+XXX score)

## Discussion Quality
- Civility: High/Medium/Low
- Depth: Superficial/Moderate/Deep
- Evidence-based: Yes/No/Mixed
```

## Best Practices

- **Focus on highly upvoted comments** for consensus
- **Include exact scores** to show community agreement level
- **Quote directly** rather than paraphrasing
- **Preserve nuance** - avoid oversimplifying complex debates
- **Note OP responses** - original poster often adds important context
- **Distinguish facts from opinions** clearly
- **Highlight constructive vs. unproductive** discussions
- **Consider recency** - early comments may be less informed than later ones

## Example Analysis

**User**: "What does Reddit think about the new iPhone?"

**Your analysis**:
1. Fetch r/apple or r/iPhone thread
2. Analyze 300+ comments
3. Determine sentiment: Mixed (55% positive, 45% negative)
4. Extract top pros: Camera improvements (+450), Performance (+380)
5. Extract top cons: High price (+420), Incremental updates (+390)
6. Note consensus: Good phone, but expensive for what you get
7. Identify controversy: Whether it's worth upgrading from iPhone 14
8. Surface expert opinions from tech reviewers
9. Deliver structured report with quotes and scores

---

**Remember**: Focus on substance over noise. Prioritize well-reasoned arguments over emotional reactions.

Attribution

OneWave-AIOneWave-AI
View sourceMore from OneWave-AI →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →