Skip to content
Back to skills

Devops

ASecurity

<!-- SKILL.md — DevOps operating manual. Runtime: Claude Code + ACP (swappable coding CLI). Content stays LCD — no assumptions about a specific cloud/CI/runtime unless injected via a stack overlay. Stack-specific commands are NOT here — they live in stacks/<stack>/ overlays. Injection points are marked: `STACK: ...` -->

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 20, 2026
ai-agentsgofrontendbackenddevops

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 7 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 20, 2026

npx -y skills add oneafrikan/the-grid --skill devops --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Devops?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Devops
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/oneafrikan-devops/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oneafrikan-devops)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
<!--
  SKILL.md — DevOps operating manual.
  Runtime: Claude Code + ACP (swappable coding CLI). Content stays LCD —
  no assumptions about a specific cloud/CI/runtime unless injected via a stack overlay.
  Stack-specific commands are NOT here — they live in stacks/<stack>/ overlays.
  Injection points are marked: `STACK: ...`
-->

# Skill: DevOps

## Invocation

```
/devops <task reference — PRD / deploy request path>
```

Or picked up from a Signal Protocol entry / PR assigned to devops. Either way:
**no deploy request, no deploy.** If there's no PRD or written deploy request to
reference, ask for one. Production promotion always waits on the human.

---

## Step 1 — Read the PRD / deploy request

Before touching any pipeline or environment, confirm from the PRD or request:

| Question | Why |
|---|---|
| What is being deployed, and from which branch/commit/artefact? | Bounds the work; you deploy a known, gated build — not "latest" |
| Has QA gated it? | Nothing reaches a deploy that hasn't passed the release gate |
| What environments exist, and which is the target? | Staging proves it before production; never deploy straight to prod |
| What secrets/config does it need, and where do they live? | Secrets come from the store, never the diff — plan access first |
| What is the rollback condition and the rollback step? | You don't deploy without knowing how to undo it |
| What must be true after deploy (health check / canary metric)? | This is your definition of done — observable, not assumed |

**Rule:** If the deploy target, the rollback, or the gate status is unclear, ask
once. If still unclear, escalate — do not deploy on assumption.

---

## Step 2 — Set up / confirm CI (build, test, lint gates)

The pipeline is the contract for what's allowed to ship. Confirm or build it so a
merge can't reach a deploy without passing:

- **Build** — produces the deployable artefact deterministically.
- **Test** — the project's test suite runs and must pass; a red suite blocks the pipeline.
- **Lint / type-check** — static gates run and must pass.
- **Secrets** — pulled from the secret store at run time, never echoed in CI output.

<!-- STACK: stack-specific CI system + pipeline config syntax injected here -->

Every pipeline step is idempotent and re-run-safe. A retried job is a clean no-op
where nothing changed, not a double-apply.

---

## Step 3 — Define environments + secrets handling

- Enumerate the environments (e.g. local → staging → production) and what differs between them (URLs, scale, data).
- Each environment reads its config/secrets from the store — no credentials in code, in the repo, in logs, or in CI output.
- Secret creation, rotation, or new grants are an escalation, not a self-serve action (see SOUL → Escalation).

<!-- STACK: stack-specific secret store + environment config mechanism injected here -->

---

## Step 4 — Deploy strategy (staging → prod, human approves prod)

1. **Deploy to staging first.** Run the pipeline against staging.
2. **Verify in staging** — health check green, smoke test passes, logs clean. Observe it; don't assume it.
3. **Prepare the production promotion** — write the deploy steps, the rollback steps, and the canary check. Present them to the human.
4. **Human approves production.** Only on explicit approval do you promote. DevOps proposes; the human decides.
5. **Promote** using a strategy that limits blast radius (rolling / canary / blue-green as the stack supports).

<!-- STACK: stack-specific deploy mechanism + strategy injected here -->

---

## Step 5 — Rollback plan

Before promoting, the rollback is written and ready:

- The exact step to revert to the previous known-good version.
- The trigger condition (failed health check, canary metric breach, error-rate spike).
- Confirmation the rollback is itself safe to run twice (idempotent) and doesn't follow state you just created.

Never promote to production without a tested, written rollback path.

<!-- STACK: stack-specific rollback mechanism injected here -->

---

## Step 6 — Monitoring / alerting

- Confirm the deployed version emits health + the key metrics the canary will read.
- Alerts route to the operator/channel for the rollback-trigger conditions.
- The dashboard or query that proves health is recorded in the deploy notes.

<!-- STACK: stack-specific monitoring/alerting tooling injected here -->

---

## Step 7 — Post-deploy canary check

After promotion, **observe — do not assume**:

- Health endpoint green on the new version.
- Canary metric (error rate, latency, key business signal) within bounds over the watch window.
- Logs show the new version serving, no new error class.

If the canary breaches → roll back per Step 5, then report. Do not push through a
failing canary.

---

## Step 8 — Hand off (async)

Per the Signal Protocol — handoff is file-based / PR, never a live spawn.

Append to `signals/→<agent>.md` (or annotate the PR) with:

```markdown
## Deploy — <Feature Name>

### Source
PRD / request: <path> | Artefact: <commit/tag> | QA gate: <passed?>

### What shipped + where
- <env> ← <version> via <strategy>

### Rollback
- Trigger: <condition>
- Step: <exact revert command/action>

### Monitoring
- Health: <endpoint/query> | Canary: <metric + bounds> | Alerts → <channel>

### Verification (observed, not assumed)
- [ ] Staging verified before promotion
- [ ] Production health green post-deploy
- [ ] Canary within bounds over watch window

### Definition of done
- [ ] Human approved the production promotion
- [ ] Rollback path written and confirmed re-run-safe
```

Route a server-side fault back to backend-dev, a UI build issue to frontend-dev,
a gate question to qa-engineer, a scope/architecture change to tech-lead.

---

## Deploy checklist

Every production deploy answers all of these before promotion:

- [ ] Artefact built from a QA-gated, known commit (not "latest")
- [ ] Deployed and verified in staging first
- [ ] Secrets sourced from the store; none in code, logs, or CI output
- [ ] Rollback step written, and confirmed safe to run twice
- [ ] Health check + canary metric defined and readable
- [ ] Human approval obtained for the production promotion
- [ ] Pipeline steps idempotent (a retry is a clean no-op)

---

## Rollback runbook template

```markdown
### Rollback runbook — <Feature / Deploy>

**Previous known-good:** <version / commit / tag>
**Trigger conditions (any one → roll back):**
- Health check fails for <duration>
- Error rate > <threshold> over <window>
- <key metric> breaches <bound>

**Steps:**
1. <command/action to revert to previous known-good>   # idempotent
2. Confirm health check green on the rolled-back version (observe, don't assume)
3. Confirm canary metric back within bounds
4. Notify operator via <channel> with status + cause

**Safety:** steps act only on the OLD/new state, never follow a symlink/pointer
created by the deploy being reverted. Safe to run twice — second run is a no-op.
```

---

## CI pipeline checklist

Every pipeline you set up or confirm answers all of these:

- [ ] Build is deterministic and produces the deployable artefact
- [ ] Full test suite runs; a red suite blocks the pipeline
- [ ] Lint / type-check run and block on failure
- [ ] Secrets injected from the store at run time, never echoed in output
- [ ] Each step is idempotent and re-run-safe
- [ ] No path from merge to deploy that skips the gates
- [ ] A failed job leaves no half-applied state

<!-- STACK: stack-specific CI tool + per-branch/per-worktree isolation injected here -->

Files in this skill

  • AGENTS.md3.5 KB
  • IDENTITY.md648 B
  • MEMORY.md1.9 KB
  • SKILL.md7.4 KB
  • SOUL.md4.5 KB
  • USER.md918 B
  • role.yaml664 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.