Use this skill when you need to QA audit and fix a plugin skill file. Provides a methodology for verifying skill content against official documentation, fixing issues in-place, and producing verification reports.
Scanned 2/10/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add OmidZamani/dspy-skills --skill skills-skill-perfection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Skills Skill Perfection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/omidzamani-skills-skill-perfection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: skill-perfection
description: "Use this skill when you need to QA audit and fix a plugin skill file. Provides a methodology for verifying skill content against official documentation, fixing issues in-place, and producing verification reports."
version: 1.1.0
---
# Skill Perfection
A systematic process for auditing and fixing plugin skills in a single pass.
## Core Principle
**Audit + Fix in One Pass**: When you find an issue, fix it immediately, then continue. This eliminates redundant research and multiple iterations.
## Process Overview
```
[Optional Preflight] → Audit+Fix (single pass) → Verify (spot-check) → Report
```
## Phase 1: Preflight (Optional, Advisory)
A Python-based preflight script is bundled for **Python-heavy skills only**.
### When to Use Preflight
| Skill Content | Use Preflight? |
|---------------|----------------|
| Mostly Python code blocks | ✅ Yes |
| Mixed Python + other languages | ⚠️ Optional (Python blocks only) |
| Non-Python (JS, Rust, Go, etc.) | ❌ Skip, go to Phase 2 |
| Skill about the preflight script itself | ❌ Skip (conflict of interest) |
### Running Preflight
```bash
uv run python ${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/preflight.py <path-to-skill.md> --no-urls
```
### Interpreting Results
| Result | Action |
|--------|--------|
| `✅ PASSED` | Good signal. Proceed to Phase 2, trust syntax is valid. |
| `❌ FAILED` with clear errors (syntax error at line X) | Fix those specific issues, then proceed to Phase 2. |
| `❌ FAILED` with confusing/many errors | **Ignore preflight entirely.** Proceed to Phase 2, let LLM verify. |
| Script crashes or hangs | **Ignore preflight entirely.** Proceed to Phase 2. |
### Key Rule: Preflight is Advisory
**The preflight script is a helper, not a gatekeeper.** If it produces confusing output, skip it. The LLM-based Phase 2 is always authoritative.
Signs to ignore preflight:
- More than 10 errors on a skill that "looks fine"
- Errors that don't make sense (line numbers don't match)
- Python tracebacks from the script itself
- Timeouts or hanging
**When in doubt, skip preflight and let the LLM verify everything.**
## Phase 2: Audit + Fix (Single Pass) - THE CORE
This is the main phase. Work through the skill file section by section.
### 2.1 Identify the Technology
From the skill's content, identify:
- Primary technology/framework (e.g., LangGraph, React, Axum, Go-kit)
- Version constraints if mentioned
- Official documentation domain
### 2.2 Research Strategy
**Batch similar lookups** to minimize web calls:
```
Example: For a skill with 10 import statements from the same package,
do ONE search that covers them all, not 10 separate searches.
```
**Documentation priority**:
1. Official docs (use `site:` filter)
2. Official GitHub repo (examples, tests, README)
3. Package registry (PyPI, npm, crates.io, pkg.go.dev)
4. Official blog/changelog
### 2.3 For Each Verifiable Item
| Item Type | What to Verify |
|-----------|---------------|
| Import/require statement | Package exists, path is current, not deprecated |
| API call | Signature matches official docs, parameters correct |
| Code example | Would execute, complete imports, correct syntax |
| URL/link | Accessible (WebFetch), points to claimed content |
| Version claim | Current/accurate |
| Best practice claim | Aligned with official recommendations |
### 2.4 Fix-As-You-Go
When you find an issue:
1. **STOP** auditing that section
2. **FIX** the issue immediately (Edit tool)
3. **LOG** the change in memory: `{location, old, new, reason, source_url}`
4. **CONTINUE** auditing
**All severities get fixed in one pass** - don't defer anything.
### 2.5 Syntax Verification (LLM-based)
For code blocks, verify syntax by reading carefully:
**Python**: Check for matching parentheses, correct indentation, valid syntax
**JavaScript/TypeScript**: Check for matching braces, valid syntax, correct imports
**Rust**: Check for matching braces, semicolons, valid syntax
**Go**: Check for matching braces, correct package structure
**Any language**: Apply your knowledge of that language's syntax rules
If unsure about syntax validity, note it but don't block on it - focus on semantic correctness against official docs.
## Phase 3: Verification (Spot-Check)
After completing Phase 2:
1. **Re-read the modified skill file**
2. **Spot-check 3-5 items you fixed** (not everything)
3. **Verify URLs you added/modified** (WebFetch)
If spot-checks pass → Proceed to Phase 4
If spot-checks fail → Fix those specific items, re-check only those
**Do NOT do a full re-audit.** You already verified everything in Phase 2.
## Phase 4: Generate Report
Create a concise report (<100 lines):
```markdown
# Skill Perfection Report
**Skill**: {skill-name}
**Date**: {date}
**Version**: {old} → {new}
**Status**: ✅ PERFECTED | ⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW
## Summary
- Items verified: {N}
- Issues found and fixed: {N}
## Changes Made
### High Priority
| Location | Change | Reason | Source |
|----------|--------|--------|--------|
| line 45 | `old` → `new` | why | [docs](url) |
### Medium/Low Priority
| Location | Change | Reason | Source |
|----------|--------|--------|--------|
| line 12 | `old` → `new` | why | [docs](url) |
## Verification
- [x] All imports verified against official docs
- [x] All API signatures match current documentation
- [x] Code examples are complete and correct
- [x] All URLs accessible
## Sources
1. {url}
2. {url}
```
Save to: `{skill-directory}/PERFECTION_REPORT.md`
## Efficiency Guidelines
| Metric | Target |
|--------|--------|
| Web searches | <20 per skill (batch similar items) |
| Iterations | 1 audit+fix pass + 1 spot-check |
| Report length | <100 lines |
## Anti-Patterns
❌ Run preflight on non-Python skills
✅ Skip preflight, let LLM verify
❌ Trust confusing preflight output
✅ Ignore preflight when output doesn't make sense
❌ Separate audit pass, then separate update pass
✅ Fix issues as you find them
❌ Full re-audit after fixes
✅ Spot-check only changed items
❌ Research same API multiple times
✅ Batch similar lookups, cache results
## Bundled Scripts
### scripts/preflight.py
**Purpose**: Quick syntax check for Python-heavy skills
**Limitation**: Only useful for Python; advisory only
```bash
# Use for Python skills
uv run python ${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/preflight.py skill.md --no-urls
# Skip for non-Python skills or if output is confusing
```
**If preflight causes problems, ignore it entirely.** The LLM-based audit is always the authoritative verification.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!