Skip to content
Back to skills

Selfdestruct Eip6780

ASecurity

Detect selfdestruct misuse and EIP-6780 implications post-Cancun — bricked contracts, broken `assert(balance == X)` invariants, factory patterns relying on redeploy, deployment-tx-only selfdestruct corner cases. Activate on `selfdestruct`, `suicide`, `CREATE2` factories, contracts asserting on `address(this).balance`.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
blockchaingitsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add omermaksutii/RugProof --skill selfdestruct-eip6780 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Selfdestruct Eip6780?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Selfdestruct Eip6780
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/omermaksutii-selfdestruct-eip6780/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/omermaksutii-selfdestruct-eip6780)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: selfdestruct-eip6780
description: Detect selfdestruct misuse and EIP-6780 implications post-Cancun — bricked contracts, broken `assert(balance == X)` invariants, factory patterns relying on redeploy, deployment-tx-only selfdestruct corner cases. Activate on `selfdestruct`, `suicide`, `CREATE2` factories, contracts asserting on `address(this).balance`.
---

# selfdestruct / EIP-6780 detection

## EIP-6780 background

After Cancun (March 2024), `selfdestruct` no longer deletes the contract's code or storage *unless* called in the same transaction as the contract's deployment. It does still transfer all ether to the recipient. This changes the security model substantially:

- Pre-6780: any `selfdestruct` could brick a contract → many DoS attacks.
- Post-6780: `selfdestruct` outside the deploy-tx only forwards ether. Code/storage survives.

## When this applies

- Any `selfdestruct` call
- Contracts that assert `address(this).balance == X` (someone can force-add ether via `selfdestruct`)
- `CREATE2` factories relying on redeploy at same address (now broken — code persists)
- Diamonds / proxies with implementation-side selfdestruct
- Pre-Cancun deployed contracts (legacy semantics still apply at runtime)

## Detection patterns

### Forced-ether DoS on balance-equality assumption (HIGH — still relevant)
```solidity
require(address(this).balance == expected);   // ← attacker can `selfdestruct` ether to break this
```
Track expected balance in a state variable, not via `address(this).balance`.

### CREATE2 redeploy pattern broken (HIGH)
```solidity
// Pattern: deploy logic to deterministic addr, selfdestruct to "upgrade", redeploy.
// ← Post-6780, code persists. Redeploy at same address fails or reverts.
```
Migrate to true proxy patterns.

### selfdestruct in deploy-tx (still has full power) (HIGH)
A constructor that selfdestructs in the deploy tx truly deletes code+storage. Some "metamorphic" tricks abuse this.

### Library / facet with selfdestruct path reachable (HIGH)
Pre-6780-deployed diamond facets with selfdestruct paths remain dangerous. Even post-6780, a facet selfdestruct that orphans ether still costs.

### selfdestruct sending ether to known-revert recipient (LOW)
Selfdestruct still forwards ether — recipient cannot revert on receive (selfdestruct bypasses fallback). So this isn't a DoS for the destructor, but can leave the recipient with unexpected balance.

### Recovery via selfdestruct on stuck-fund contract (LOW-MEDIUM)
Sometimes a useful pattern — note intent.

## Severity rubric

| Pattern | Severity |
|---|---|
| `address(this).balance == X` invariant | **High** |
| Public `selfdestruct` path on deployed contract | **High** |
| CREATE2 redeploy/upgrade pattern (post-Cancun broken) | **High** |
| Diamond facet selfdestruct reachable | **High** |
| Constructor metamorphic selfdestruct | **High** *(may be intentional, document)* |
| `selfdestruct` to known revert-on-receive recipient | **Low** |
| `selfdestruct` as legitimate recovery, properly guarded | **Info** |

## Remediation patterns

- Don't use `address(this).balance` as part of any invariant. Track received ether explicitly.
- Migrate metamorphic / CREATE2-redeploy patterns to standard proxies (UUPS / Transparent).
- Remove `selfdestruct` from production contracts unless absolutely needed.
- If retained, guard heavily (multi-sig + timelock).

## False-positive notes

- A contract using `selfdestruct` only in a test-helper or migration script → not deployable, ignore.
- `selfdestruct` whose recipient is the contract's own address — does nothing useful, comment as code smell.

## Related

- [[delegatecall-risks]]
- [[dos-vectors]]
- [[access-control]]

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.