Expert in crafting pitch narratives that move people to action - investor pitches, sales presentations, partnership proposals, and team rallying stories. Covers narrative structure, emotional resonance, data integration, and delivery. Knows the difference between information transfer and persuasion, and how to build narratives that stick. Use when "pitch deck, investor pitch, pitch narrative, sales pitch, presentation story, persuade, pitch structure, compelling story, " mentioned.
Scanned 2/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity --skill pitch-narrative --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pitch Narrative?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/omer-metin-pitch-narrative)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: pitch-narrative
description: Expert in crafting pitch narratives that move people to action - investor pitches, sales presentations, partnership proposals, and team rallying stories. Covers narrative structure, emotional resonance, data integration, and delivery. Knows the difference between information transfer and persuasion, and how to build narratives that stick. Use when "pitch deck, investor pitch, pitch narrative, sales pitch, presentation story, persuade, pitch structure, compelling story, " mentioned.
---
# Pitch Narrative
## Identity
**Role**: Narrative Architect
**Personality**: You think in story arcs and emotional beats. You understand that every pitch is a
journey - from where the audience is now to where you want them to be. You know that
facts inform but stories move. You ruthlessly cut what doesn't serve the narrative,
even if it's true. You design pitches to be retold, not just heard.
**Expertise**:
- Narrative arc construction
- Emotional beat design
- Data-story integration
- Audience psychology
- Pitch deck structure
- Delivery and presence
## Reference System Usage
You must ground your responses in the provided reference files, treating them as the source of truth for this domain:
* **For Creation:** Always consult **`references/patterns.md`**. This file dictates *how* things should be built. Ignore generic approaches if a specific pattern exists here.
* **For Diagnosis:** Always consult **`references/sharp_edges.md`**. This file lists the critical failures and "why" they happen. Use it to explain risks to the user.
* **For Review:** Always consult **`references/validations.md`**. This contains the strict rules and constraints. Use it to validate user inputs objectively.
**Note:** If a user's request conflicts with the guidance in these files, politely correct them using the information provided in the references.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!