Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Use task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md to maintain persistent context. Use for multi-step tasks, research, or work spanning many tool calls.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill planning-with-files --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Planning With Files?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oimiragieo-planning-with-files)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: planning-with-files
description: Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Use task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md to maintain persistent context. Use for multi-step tasks, research, or work spanning many tool calls.
version: 1.1.0
tools:
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- TaskUpdate
- TaskList
verified: true
lastVerifiedAt: 2026-02-22T00:00:00.000Z
source: builtin
trust_score: 100
provenance_sha: cf607bcd4c0a461c
---
# Planning with Files - Manus-Style File-Based Planning
Work like Manus (the $2B AI agent Meta acquired): Use persistent markdown files as your "working memory on disk."
## Core Principle
```
Context Window = RAM (volatile, limited)
Filesystem = Disk (persistent, unlimited)
→ Anything important gets written to disk.
```
## The 3-File Pattern
For every complex task, create THREE files in your project directory:
```
task_plan.md → Track phases and progress
findings.md → Store research and findings
progress.md → Session log and test results
```
**Templates are available at:** `.claude/templates/planning/`
## When to Use This Pattern
**Use for:**
- Multi-step tasks (3+ steps)
- Research tasks
- Building/creating projects
- Tasks spanning many tool calls
- Anything requiring organization
**Skip for:**
- Simple questions
- Single-file edits
- Quick lookups
## Critical Timing Rules
These rules simulate hooks to ensure proper workflow:
### 📌 At Task Start (SessionStart)
**MUST** create all three files FIRST before any other work:
1. Create `task_plan.md` using the template
2. Create `findings.md` using the template
3. Create `progress.md` using the template
4. Fill in the Goal section in task_plan.md
**Why:** Without planning files, you'll forget goals after 50+ tool calls.
### 📌 Before Major Decisions (PreToolUse)
**MUST** re-read `task_plan.md` before:
- Writing or editing files
- Executing commands
- Making architectural decisions
- Implementing features
**How:** Use the Read tool to refresh the plan in your context.
**Why:** This keeps goals fresh in your attention window (Manus's "attention manipulation").
### 📌 After File Operations (PostToolUse)
**MUST** update status immediately after:
- Writing files
- Editing files
- Completing a task phase
**How:** Edit task_plan.md to update phase status:
```markdown
- **Status:** pending → in_progress → complete
```
**Why:** Tracks progress and prevents losing track of what's done.
### 📌 Before Task End (Stop)
**MUST** verify completion:
- Check all phases marked as `complete`
- Review deliverables section
- Ensure no errors left unresolved
**Why:** Prevents premature completion with missing work.
## The 6 Critical Rules
### 1. Create Plan First
Never start a complex task without `task_plan.md`. Non-negotiable.
```markdown
## Goal
[One sentence describing the end state]
## Current Phase
Phase 1
## Phases
### Phase 1: Requirements & Discovery
- [ ] Understand user intent
- [ ] Identify constraints
- **Status:** in_progress
```
### 2. The 2-Action Rule
> "After every 2 view/browser/search operations, IMMEDIATELY save key findings to findings.md."
This prevents visual/multimodal information from being lost.
```markdown
## Visual/Browser Findings
- Screenshot shows login form with email and password fields
- API documentation indicates JSON response format
```
### 3. Read Before Decide
Before major decisions, read the plan file. This keeps goals in your attention window.
```bash
# Before implementing a feature:
Read tool → task_plan.md
# Now proceed with implementation
```
### 4. Update After Act
After completing any phase:
- Mark phase status: `pending` → `in_progress` → `complete`
- Log any errors encountered
- Note files created/modified
```markdown
## Errors Encountered
| Error | Attempt | Resolution |
| ----------------- | ------- | ---------------------- |
| FileNotFoundError | 1 | Created default config |
```
### 5. Log ALL Errors
Every error goes in the plan file. This builds knowledge and prevents repetition.
### 6. Never Repeat Failures
```
if action_failed:
next_action != same_action
```
Track what you tried. Mutate the approach.
## The 3-Strike Error Protocol
```
ATTEMPT 1: Diagnose & Fix
→ Read error carefully
→ Identify root cause
→ Apply targeted fix
ATTEMPT 2: Alternative Approach
→ Same error? Try different method
→ Different tool? Different library?
→ NEVER repeat exact same failing action
ATTEMPT 3: Broader Rethink
→ Question assumptions
→ Search for solutions
→ Consider updating the plan
AFTER 3 FAILURES: Escalate to User
→ Explain what you tried
→ Share the specific error
→ Ask for guidance
```
## File Purposes
| File | Purpose | When to Update |
| -------------- | --------------------------- | ------------------- |
| `task_plan.md` | Phases, progress, decisions | After each phase |
| `findings.md` | Research, discoveries | After ANY discovery |
| `progress.md` | Session log, test results | Throughout session |
## Read vs Write Decision Matrix
| Situation | Action | Reason |
| --------------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------------------- |
| Just wrote a file | DON'T read | Content still in context |
| Viewed image/PDF | Write findings NOW | Multimodal → text before lost |
| Browser returned data | Write to file | Screenshots don't persist |
| Starting new phase | Read plan/findings | Re-orient if context stale |
| Error occurred | Read relevant file | Need current state to fix |
| Resuming after gap | Read all planning files | Recover state |
## The 5-Question Reboot Test
If you can answer these, your context management is solid:
| Question | Answer Source |
| -------------------- | ----------------------------- |
| Where am I? | Current phase in task_plan.md |
| Where am I going? | Remaining phases |
| What's the goal? | Goal statement in plan |
| What have I learned? | findings.md |
| What have I done? | progress.md |
## Template Structure
### task_plan.md Template
```markdown
# Task Plan: [Brief Description]
## Goal
[One sentence describing the end state]
## Current Phase
Phase 1
## Phases
### Phase 1: Requirements & Discovery
- [ ] Understand user intent
- [ ] Identify constraints and requirements
- [ ] Document findings in findings.md
- **Status:** in_progress
### Phase 2: Planning & Structure
- [ ] Define technical approach
- [ ] Create project structure if needed
- [ ] Document decisions with rationale
- **Status:** pending
### Phase 3: Implementation
- [ ] Execute the plan step by step
- [ ] Write code to files before executing
- [ ] Test incrementally
- **Status:** pending
### Phase 4: Testing & Verification
- [ ] Verify all requirements met
- [ ] Document test results in progress.md
- [ ] Fix any issues found
- **Status:** pending
### Phase 5: Delivery
- [ ] Review all output files
- [ ] Ensure deliverables are complete
- [ ] Deliver to user
- **Status:** pending
## Key Questions
1. [Question to answer]
2. [Question to answer]
## Decisions Made
| Decision | Rationale |
| -------- | --------- |
| | |
## Errors Encountered
| Error | Attempt | Resolution |
| ----- | ------- | ---------- |
| | 1 | |
```
### findings.md Template
```markdown
# Findings & Decisions
## Requirements
_Add requirements captured from user request here._
## Research Findings
_Document key discoveries during exploration here._
## Technical Decisions
_Record decisions made with rationale._
| Decision | Rationale |
| -------- | --------- |
| | |
## Issues Encountered
_Document errors and how they were resolved._
| Issue | Resolution |
| ----- | ---------- |
| | |
## Resources
_Add URLs, file paths, and API references here._
## Visual/Browser Findings
_CRITICAL: Update after every 2 view/browser operations._
```
### progress.md Template
```markdown
# Progress Log
## Session: [DATE]
### Phase 1: [Title]
- **Status:** in_progress
- **Started:** [timestamp]
- Actions taken:
- Files created/modified:
## Test Results
| Test | Input | Expected | Actual | Status |
| ---- | ----- | -------- | ------ | ------ |
| | | | | |
## Error Log
| Timestamp | Error | Attempt | Resolution |
| --------- | ----- | ------- | ---------- |
| | | 1 | |
## 5-Question Reboot Check
| Question | Answer |
| -------------------- | ---------------- |
| Where am I? | Phase X |
| Where am I going? | Remaining phases |
| What's the goal? | [goal statement] |
| What have I learned? | See findings.md |
| What have I done? | See above |
```
## Iron Laws
1. **ALWAYS** create `task_plan.md`, `findings.md`, and `progress.md` before starting any complex task — filesystem memory survives context resets, working memory does not.
2. **ALWAYS** re-read `task_plan.md` before making major decisions — context windows are volatile, files persist indefinitely.
3. **NEVER** retry a failed action with identical inputs — log the failure in the plan file, diagnose the root cause, and mutate the approach.
4. **ALWAYS** write multimodal findings (screenshots, browser data) to `findings.md` immediately after capture — visual context cannot be retrieved once it leaves the attention window.
5. **NEVER** mark a task complete without verifying all phases are `complete` and all deliverables are present in the progress file.
## Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
| ---------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| Using session task tools for persistence | In-memory task tracking is volatile; lost on context reset | Create `task_plan.md` file on disk — survives resets |
| Stating goals once and forgetting them | Context fills; goals drift without anchoring | Re-read plan file before every major decision |
| Hiding errors and retrying silently | Silent retries repeat the same failure endlessly | Log every error to plan file with attempt count |
| Stuffing all research into context | Context window fills; earlier content gets lost | Store large content and discoveries in `findings.md` |
| Starting execution without a plan | Undefined scope leads to wasted work and missed steps | Create all three planning files FIRST before any action |
## The Manus Principles
| Principle | Implementation |
| ----------------------- | -------------------------------- |
| Filesystem as memory | Store in files, not context |
| Attention manipulation | Re-read plan before decisions |
| Error persistence | Log failures in plan file |
| Goal tracking | Checkboxes show progress |
| Completion verification | Check all phases before stopping |
---
**Remember:** The more context you gather upfront and write to disk, the better your execution will be. Files are your persistent memory.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!