Multi-step autonomous research methodology for deep investigation tasks with structured synthesis
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill deep-research --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Deep Research?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/oimiragieo-deep-research)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: deep-research
description: Multi-step autonomous research methodology for deep investigation tasks with structured synthesis
version: 1.0.0
model: sonnet
invoked_by: both
user_invocable: true
tools: [Read, Write, WebSearch, WebFetch, Bash, Grep, Glob]
agents: [researcher, planner, architect]
category: 'Research & Investigation'
tags: [research, deep-research, investigation, synthesis, multi-step, autonomous]
best_practices:
- Define explicit scope and success criteria before starting
- Use multiple independent sources to cross-validate findings
- Synthesize into actionable insights, not just summaries
- Validate findings with primary sources
error_handling: graceful
streaming: supported
source: builtin
trust_score: 100
provenance_sha: aa4a7a8cd5041d32
---
# Deep Research
<identity>
Deep Research Skill — Multi-step autonomous research methodology for structured, evidence-based investigation and synthesis.
</identity>
<capabilities>
- 5-phase autonomous research workflow (Scope → Search → Synthesis → Validation → Report)
- Multi-source evidence gathering with cross-validation
- Structured output with citations and confidence ratings
- Gap detection and iterative depth expansion
- Actionable recommendation generation
</capabilities>
## When to Use
- Task requires investigation across multiple sources before drawing a conclusion
- Evidence-based answers needed, not pattern-matched guesses
- Question spans multiple domains and needs synthesis
- Accuracy of findings is critical to downstream decisions
**Trigger phrases:** "research", "investigate", "deep dive", "find evidence for", "comprehensive analysis of"
## Iron Law
**Never synthesize without reading sources.** Every claim in the final report must trace to a source retrieved during Phase 2.
## 5-Phase Process
**Phase 1: Scope** — Restate as one research question. Define 3–5 sub-questions, success criteria, constraints, and non-goals. Cannot proceed without a written scope block.
**Phase 2: Multi-Source Search** — Run 3+ `WebSearch` queries. `WebFetch` each source URL. `pnpm search:code` for prior-art. Maintain evidence log: URL, claim, confidence (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), sub-question. Each sub-question needs ≥2 independent sources.
**Phase 3: Synthesis** — Group evidence by sub-question. CONSENSUS (2+ sources) → HIGH; CONFLICT → LOW, flag for user. Build synthesis matrix. Label unsupported claims `[UNVERIFIED]`.
**Phase 4: Validation**
- [ ] Source freshness — appropriate time period?
- [ ] Contradiction check — resolve or flag CONFLICT items.
- [ ] Assumption audit — 3 assumptions stated explicitly?
- [ ] Scope alignment — each finding maps to a Phase 1 sub-question?
- [ ] Confidence calibration — downgrade single-source HIGH ratings.
**Phase 5: Report** — Save to `.claude/context/reports/backend/<topic>-research-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md` with sections: Executive Summary, Findings (finding + confidence + evidence per sub-question), Conflicts, Recommended Actions, Knowledge Gaps, Sources.
## Tool Usage
| Tool | Phase | Purpose |
| --------------- | ----- | ----------------------------- |
| `WebSearch` | 2A | Broad source discovery |
| `WebFetch` | 2B | Extract content from URLs |
| `Read` / `Grep` | 2C | Search codebase for prior art |
| `Write` | 5 | Save report |
## Output Locations
- Reports: `.claude/context/reports/backend/<topic>-research-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md`
- Evidence logs (temp): `.claude/context/tmp/research-evidence-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md`
## Search Protocol
1. `pnpm search:code "<query>"` — primary intent-based search
2. `Skill({ skill: 'ripgrep' })` — exact keyword/regex matches
3. `WebSearch` / `WebFetch` — external sources
4. `Grep` — fallback for single-file targeted checks
## Iron Laws
1. **NEVER proceed to Phase 3 without ≥2 sources per sub-question.**
2. **ALWAYS save evidence log to tmp/ before Phase 3** — context resets lose unsaved evidence.
3. **ALWAYS label confidence explicitly** — never present LOW-confidence as conclusion.
4. **NEVER paper over gaps** — unknown answers must be flagged, not omitted.
5. **ALWAYS verify report file exists** before marking task complete.
## Anti-Patterns
- No scope block before searching → unfocused evidence, unsynthesizable
- Single source per claim → cross-validate with ≥2 independent sources
- Synthesizing while searching → introduces confirmation bias; complete Phase 2 first
- Omitting CONFLICT evidence → flag all conflicts explicitly in report
## Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)
**Before starting:**
Read `.claude/context/memory/learnings.md`
Check for: prior reports on same topic (avoid duplicates), unreliable sources in issues.md, relevant ADRs in decisions.md.
**After completing:**
- New research pattern -> `.claude/context/memory/learnings.md`
- Unreliable source identified -> `.claude/context/memory/issues.md`
- Methodology decision -> `.claude/context/memory/decisions.md`
> ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Save evidence log and partial findings before Phase 3.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!