Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Done

ASecurity

Run the closeout ritual before handing back non-trivial work; full verification, revert-probe honesty, independent review, and scope reporting. Use before declaring completion, opening a PR, wrapping up a change, or "ปิดงาน".

6 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/23/2026
ai-agentsapisecurity

Works with

cliapi

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 9/23/2026

$npx -y skills add ohm41321/luciazero --skill done --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Done?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Done
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ohm41321-done/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ohm41321-done)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: done
description: Run the closeout ritual before handing back non-trivial work; full verification, revert-probe honesty, independent review, and scope reporting. Use before declaring completion, opening a PR, wrapping up a change, or "ปิดงาน".
---

# Done

## 1. Full verify

The **full** tier — `verify-full` when present, otherwise verify — must be
green after the last code edit. Run it only when no such result exists; an
older green does not count. Quote the shortest decisive line.

- Red → you are not here yet. Return to the loop.
- No verify command exists → use `/ready`; do not claim done.

## 2. Skeptic diff pass

Re-read the final diff as a hostile reviewer. Check:

- **Edge cases**: empty, zero, unicode, boundaries, concurrency.
- **Error paths**: failures, missing files, dropped network, cleanup.
- **Changed contracts**: APIs, formats, schema, config, old consumers.
- **Accidental content**: unrelated files, debug code, secrets, loose pins.
- **Test honesty**: would changed tests fail if implementation is reverted?

Only when the diff adds or changes tests, run
`<this-skill-dir>/scripts/revert-probe.sh "<verify-cmd>"` aimed at those tests.
Exit 2 is UNASSESSABLE: report it as no proof, not
as a pass. Weakened checks are findings. Fix findings and repeat full verify.

## 3. Risk-routed independent review

Choose focus:

- `security`: auth, permissions, input, paths, commands, secrets, endpoints.
- `contract`: public API/CLI, schema, config, migration, consumers.
- `general`: money, concurrency, resources, or a wide uncertain diff.

A small, well-understood diff with no routed risk stops after the skeptic
pass: no review is the default, not an exception. Otherwise run **one** pass —
the harness's built-in review command when it exists, else one reviewer agent
— scoped to the diff and its direct callers, naming both `security` and
`contract` when both apply; never two.

Fix and re-verify every `blocker` or `major`, unless the user explicitly
accepts the named risk. A `minor` may be deferred only when reported.

## 4. Scope check

Re-read the original request. Every item is delivered, or named as left out with
a reason. Never drop scope silently. A bus task you claimed through
`/lucia-bus` must be `completed` or `blocked`, with its result published,
unless the user cancelled it.

## 5. Lessons

For a dead end, footgun, or disproved approach, run `/retro`. If unfinished
state must transfer, use `/lucia-relay` instead.

## 6. Report

```
Done: <what changed, one line>
Proof: <verify command> → <decisive line>
Not covered: <verification gap>
Left out: <scope omitted + reason, or nothing>
```

No hedging: report done only after every step passes. Machine output mirrors the
same facts; blocked output uses `"status": "blocked"` and its failing line.

```json
{
  "status": "done",
  "verify": {"command": "./test.sh", "exit_code": 0, "decisive_line": "PASS  all checks green"},
  "not_covered": "<verification gap>",
  "left_out": "nothing"
}
```

Attribution

ohm41321ohm41321
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from ohm41321 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698621 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →