Audit Sequence

---
name: audit-sequence
description: Check a draft plan against Oak's thread-graph of coherently sequenced units and the prior knowledge statements each unit records. Use when asked to audit, sanity-check, or sequence-check a long-term plan, scheme of work, or unit order. Reports ordering breaks and knowledge gaps only. Not for a general review against Oak's curriculum principles (use oak-curriculum-principles-mcp-enabled) or for listing what pupils get wrong (use find-misconceptions). Requires the Oak Curriculum MCP.
argument-hint: <paste or reference the plan to audit>
---

Audit this sequence: $ARGUMENTS

Delegate to the **sequencing-auditor** agent.

The agent must:

1. Read the draft sequence into an ordered list of units.
2. For each unit, retrieve the prior knowledge it states it assumes from `get-prior-knowledge-graph`, and where Oak places it in its thread(s) from `get-thread-progressions`.
3. Report two kinds of finding, kept apart: **ordering breaks against Oak's threads** (a unit placed before one Oak teaches in an earlier year — data; the same year at an earlier authored position is a likely break, reported as judgement, because a key stage 4 run merges exam-board variants), and **assumed knowledge the plan may not have taught yet** (a stated requirement with no earlier unit that plausibly covers it — the agent's judgement).
4. Report findings as a short table in plan order: unit, finding, whether it is data or judgement, suggested fix.

This is a structural check, not a stylistic one. Oak's statements name knowledge, not the units that teach it — so say plainly which findings are read off the data and which are your reading of it.