Decompose large tasks across parallel agents — use for migrations, multi-file refactors, or batch work
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nyldn/claude-octopus --skill skill-parallel-agents --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Skill Parallel Agents?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nyldn-skill-parallel-agents-claude-octopus)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: skill-parallel-agents
description: "Decompose large tasks across parallel agents — use for migrations, multi-file refactors, or batch work"
disable-model-invocation: true
---
> **Host: Codex CLI** — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex.
> Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than `/octo:*` slash commands.
> Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it.
> For host tool equivalents, see `skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md`.
# Claude Octopus - Multi-Tentacled Orchestrator
## MANDATORY COMPLIANCE — DO NOT SKIP
**When this skill is invoked, you MUST dispatch work to multiple providers in parallel. You are PROHIBITED from:**
- Running tasks sequentially with a single model instead of parallel multi-provider dispatch
- Skipping orchestrate.sh and doing the work directly
- Deciding the task is "simple enough" for a single provider
- Substituting serial Claude-only execution for multi-LLM parallel execution
**This skill exists specifically for multi-provider parallel work. If you catch yourself thinking "I'll just do this myself" — STOP.**
**Multi-tentacled orchestrator for Claude Code** - using Double Diamond methodology for comprehensive problem exploration, consensus building, and validated delivery.
```
DISCOVER DEFINE DEVELOP DELIVER
(probe) (grasp) (tangle) (ink)
\ / \ / \ / \ /
\ * / \ * / \ * / \ * /
\ * * / \ / \ * * / \ /
\ / \ / \ / \ /
\ / \ / \ / \ /
Diverge then Converge to Diverge with Converge to
converge problem solutions delivery
```
## Quick Start
> **Note for Claude Code users:** You don't need to run these commands! Just talk naturally to Claude:
> - "Research OAuth authentication patterns"
> - "Build a user authentication system"
> - "Review this code for security issues"
>
> The commands below are for direct CLI usage or automation.
```bash
# Full Double Diamond workflow (all 4 phases)
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh embrace "Build a user authentication system"
# Individual phases
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh probe "Research authentication best practices"
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grasp "Define auth requirements"
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh tangle "Implement auth feature"
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh ink "Validate and deliver auth implementation"
# Crossfire: Adversarial cross-model review
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grapple "implement password reset API"
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grapple --principles security "implement JWT auth"
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh squeeze "review auth.ts for vulnerabilities"
# Smart auto-routing (detects intent automatically)
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "research OAuth patterns" # -> probe
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "build user login" # -> tangle + ink
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "review the auth code" # -> ink
```
## IMPORTANT: When NOT to Use This Skill
**DO NOT use this skill if the user's request involves:**
1. **Built-in Claude Code commands** - Commands starting with `/` that are part of Claude Code itself:
- `/plugin` - Plugin management (add, remove, update, list)
- `/init` - Project initialization
- `/help` - Help documentation
- `/clear` - Clear conversation
- `/commit` - Git commit operations
- `/remember` - Memory management
- Any other `/` command that isn't `/parallel-agents` or `/octo:*`
2. **Direct tool usage** - Simple file operations, git commands, or terminal tasks
- Reading/writing files
- Running git commands
- Basic bash operations
- These should use built-in tools directly
3. **Claude Code configuration** - Managing Claude Code itself
- Changing settings
- Managing plugins
- Updating Claude Code
**If the user's request matches any of the above, DO NOT activate this skill. Handle the request using standard Claude Code tools and capabilities instead.**
## Visual Indicators - Know What's Running
Claude Octopus uses **visual indicators** so you always know which AI is responding:
| Indicator | Meaning | Uses |
|-----------|---------|------|
| 🐙 | **Parallel Mode** | Multiple CLIs orchestrated via orchestrate.sh |
| 🔴 | **Codex CLI** | OpenAI Codex (your OPENAI_API_KEY) |
| 🧭 | **Antigravity CLI** | Google Antigravity (your authenticated seat) |
| 🔵 | **Claude Subagent** | Claude Code host subagent tool (built-in) |
### What Triggers External CLIs vs Subagents
**External CLIs execute when:**
- Using `/parallel-agents` command explicitly
- Using `/octo:debate` command (AI Debate Hub)
- Running orchestrate.sh workflows (probe, grasp, tangle, ink, embrace, grapple, squeeze)
- Knowledge mode deliberation (when Knowledge Mode is ON)
- Natural language that triggers this skill (research, build, review tasks)
**Claude Subagents execute when:**
- Simple file operations (read, write, edit)
- Git commands and bash operations
- Code reading and navigation
- Tasks that don't need multiple perspectives
- Built-in Claude Code capabilities are sufficient
**Why this matters:** External CLIs use your OpenAI/Google API quotas and incur costs. Claude subagents are included with Claude Code at no additional charge.
When you see 🐙 **CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED**, external CLI providers such as Codex, Antigravity, and others will be invoked for multi-perspective analysis.
## Force Multi-Provider Mode
Sometimes you want multi-provider analysis even for simple tasks that wouldn't normally trigger workflows. This is useful when you need comprehensive perspectives on decisions, want to compare how different models think, or when automatic routing underestimates task complexity.
### Explicit Command
Force multi-provider execution using the `/octo:multi` command:
```
/octo:multi "Explain how Redis works"
/octo:multi "What is OAuth?"
/octo:multi "Review this simple function"
/octo:multi "Should we use TypeScript?"
```
### Natural Language Triggers
You can also force multi-provider mode with natural language:
```
"Run this with all providers: What is JWT?"
"I want multiple AI models to look at our architecture"
"Get multiple perspectives on this design decision"
"Use all providers for explaining caching strategies"
"Force multi-provider analysis of our API design"
```
### When to Force Parallel Mode
**Use forced parallel mode when:**
- **High-stakes decisions** require comprehensive analysis from multiple models
- **Comparing perspectives** - you want to see how different models approach the same problem
- **Simple questions with depth** - seemingly simple questions that deserve thorough multi-model analysis
- **Learning different approaches** - exploring how each model thinks about a topic
- **Automatic routing underestimates complexity** - task appears simple but has nuance
**Don't force parallel mode when:**
- Task already auto-triggers workflows (`octo research`, `octo build`, `octo review`)
- Simple factual questions Claude can answer reliably
- Cost efficiency is important (see cost awareness below)
- File operations or code navigation (use built-in tools)
### Cost Awareness
Forcing parallel mode uses external CLIs for every task, which incurs API costs:
| Provider | Cost per Query | What It Uses |
|----------|----------------|--------------|
| 🔴 Codex CLI | ~$0.01-0.05 | Your OPENAI_API_KEY |
| 🧭 Antigravity CLI | Included with access/subscription | Antigravity CLI auth |
| 🔵 Claude | Included | Claude Code subscription |
**Total cost per forced query: ~$0.02-0.08**
Use forced parallel mode judiciously for tasks where multiple perspectives genuinely add value. For routine work, let automatic routing decide when multi-provider analysis is beneficial.
### Visual Indicator
When you force parallel mode, you'll see this banner:
```
🐙 **CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED** - Multi-provider mode
Force parallel execution
Providers:
🔴 Codex CLI - [Role in this task]
🧭 Antigravity CLI - [Role in this task]
🔵 Claude - [Role in this task]
```
Followed by results from each provider marked with their indicators (for example 🔴 🟡 🧭 🔵).
## Prerequisites check
Once this skill activates, run the local provider check:
```bash
OCTO_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin}"
"$OCTO_ROOT/scripts/orchestrate.sh" detect-providers
```
This check reads local commands, credentials, and the one-hour cache. It does not call provider APIs. Current output includes the Claude Code version contract and one status per provider:
```text
Detecting Claude Code version...
CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION=2.1.219
CLAUDE_CODE_STATUS=ok
CLAUDE_CODE_MINIMUM=2.1.14
CODEX_STATUS=ok
AGY_STATUS=unauthenticated
```
Provider values are `ok`, `unauthenticated`, `quota`, `not-installed`, or a specific reason such as `model-invalid`.
### Route based on the result
If Claude Code is outdated, stop and show the version and update instructions reported by the command:
```text
CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION=2.1.13
CLAUDE_CODE_STATUS=outdated
CLAUDE_CODE_MINIMUM=2.1.14
```
If one non-Claude provider reports `ok`, use it. Parallel execution needs at least one ready non-Claude provider, but ordinary Claude-only commands still work without one. If none reports `ok`, stop the parallel workflow, direct the user to `/octo:setup`, and do not simulate provider agreement by running one provider repeatedly. One ready provider can supply an additional perspective, but it is not multi-provider consensus.
The command writes `~/.claude-octopus/.provider-cache`. Reuse it for up to one hour; after that, run detection again.
## Double Diamond Workflow
### Phase 1: PROBE (Discover)
**Diverge then converge on understanding**
Parallel research from 4 perspectives:
- Problem space analysis (constraints, requirements, needs)
- Existing solutions research (what worked, what failed)
- Edge cases exploration (potential challenges)
- Technical feasibility (prerequisites, dependencies)
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh probe "What are the best approaches for real-time notifications?"
```
### Phase 2: GRASP (Define)
**Build consensus on the problem**
Multi-tentacled problem definition:
- Core problem statement
- Success criteria
- Constraints and boundaries
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grasp "Define requirements for notification system" --context probe-synthesis-*.md
```
### Phase 3: TANGLE (Develop)
**Diverge with multiple solutions**
Enhanced map-reduce with validation:
- Task decomposition via LLM
- Parallel execution across agents
- Quality gate (75% success threshold)
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh tangle "Implement notification service" --context grasp-consensus-*.md
```
### Phase 4: INK (Deliver)
**Converge to validated delivery**
Pre-delivery validation:
- Quality gate verification
- Result synthesis
- Final deliverable generation
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh ink "Deliver notification system" --context tangle-validation-*.md
```
### Full Workflow: EMBRACE
Run all 4 phases sequentially with automatic context passing:
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh embrace "Create a complete user dashboard feature"
```
## Crossfire: Adversarial Cross-Model Review
Different models have different blind spots. Crossfire commands force models to critique each other's work, catching more issues than single-model review.
### GRAPPLE - Adversarial Debate
*Two tentacles wrestling until consensus*
Available providers each propose solutions, then critique each other's work. A synthesis determines the winner.
```
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Codex │ │ Antigravity │
│ (Proposer) │ │ (Proposer) │
└──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ PROPOSAL A │ ←─→ │ PROPOSAL B │
└──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Antigravity │ │ Codex │
│ (Critic) │ │ (Critic) │
└──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘
│ │
└─────────┬─────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ SYNTHESIS │
│ (Winner + Fix) │
└─────────────────┘
```
```bash
# Basic grapple
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grapple "implement password reset API"
# Grapple with security principles
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grapple --principles security "implement JWT authentication"
# Grapple with performance principles
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grapple --principles performance "optimize database queries"
```
### SQUEEZE - Red Team Security Review
*Octopus squeezes prey to test for weaknesses*
Blue Team (Codex) implements secure code. Red Team (Antigravity) attacks to find vulnerabilities. Then remediation and validation.
```
Phase 1: Blue Team implements secure solution
Phase 2: Red Team finds vulnerabilities
Phase 3: Remediation fixes all issues
Phase 4: Validation verifies all fixed
```
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh squeeze "implement user login form"
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh squeeze "review auth.ts for vulnerabilities"
```
### Constitutional Principles
Grapple supports domain-specific critique principles:
| Principle | Focus | Use Case |
|-----------|-------|----------|
| `general` | Overall quality | Default for most reviews |
| `security` | OWASP Top 10, secure coding | Auth, payments, user data |
| `performance` | N+1 queries, caching, async | Database, API optimization |
| `maintainability` | Clean code, testability | Refactoring, code reviews |
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grapple --principles security "implement password reset"
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grapple --principles performance "optimize search API"
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grapple --principles maintainability "refactor user service"
```
## Smart Auto-Routing
The `auto` command detects intent keywords and routes to the appropriate workflow:
| Keywords | Routes To | Phases |
|----------|-----------|--------|
| research, explore, investigate, analyze | `probe` | Discover |
| develop, dev, build, implement, create | `tangle` + `ink` | Develop + Deliver |
| qa, test, review, validate, check | `ink` | Deliver (quality focus) |
| security audit, red team, pentest | `squeeze` | Red Team |
| adversarial, cross-model, debate | `grapple` | Debate |
| (other coding keywords) | `codex` agent | Single agent |
| (other design keywords) | `agy` agent | Single agent |
**Examples:**
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "research best practices for caching" # -> probe
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "build the caching layer" # -> tangle + ink
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "review the cache implementation" # -> ink
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "security audit the auth module" # -> squeeze
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "have both models debate the API design" # -> grapple
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "fix the cache invalidation bug" # -> codex
```
## Quality Gates
The `tangle` phase enforces quality gates:
| Score | Status | Behavior |
|-------|--------|----------|
| >= 90% | PASSED | Proceed to ink |
| 75-89% | WARNING | Proceed with caution |
| < 75% | FAILED | Ink phase flags for review |
## Command Reference
### Double Diamond Commands
| Command | Phase | Description |
|---------|-------|-------------|
| `probe <prompt>` | Discover | Parallel research with AI synthesis |
| `grasp <prompt>` | Define | Consensus building on problem definition |
| `tangle <prompt>` | Develop | Enhanced map-reduce with quality gates |
| `ink <prompt>` | Deliver | Validation and final delivery |
| `embrace <prompt>` | All 4 | Full Double Diamond workflow |
| `preflight` | - | Validate all dependencies |
### Crossfire Commands (Adversarial Review)
| Command | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| `grapple <prompt>` | Codex vs Antigravity debate until consensus |
| `grapple --principles TYPE <prompt>` | Debate with domain principles (security, performance, maintainability) |
| `squeeze <prompt>` | Red Team security review (Blue Team vs Red Team) |
### Classic Orchestration Commands
| Command | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| `init` | Initialize workspace |
| `spawn <agent> <prompt>` | Spawn single agent |
| `auto <prompt>` | Smart routing (Double Diamond or agent) |
| `fan-out <prompt>` | Send to multiple agents |
| `map-reduce <prompt>` | Decompose and parallelize |
| `parallel [tasks.json]` | Execute task file |
| `status` | Show running agents |
| `kill [id\|all]` | Terminate agents |
| `clean` | Reset workspace |
| `aggregate [filter]` | Combine results |
### Options
| Option | Default | Description |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| `-p, --parallel` | 3 | Max concurrent agents |
| `-t, --timeout` | 300 | Timeout per task (seconds) |
| `-v, --verbose` | false | Verbose logging |
| `-n, --dry-run` | false | Show without executing |
| `--context <file>` | - | Context from previous phase |
## Agent Selection (Premium Defaults)
| Agent | Model | Best For |
|-------|-------|----------|
| `codex` | gpt-5.6-sol | Frontier implementation and independent review |
| `codex-standard` | gpt-5.6-terra | Balanced implementation and review |
| `codex-mini` | gpt-5.6-luna | Quick fixes, simple tasks |
| `agy` | service-selected default | Deep analysis and external review |
| `agy-research` | service-selected default | Research-focused Antigravity seat |
| `codex-review` | gpt-5.6-sol | Code review mode |
| `openrouter` | Various | Universal fallback (400+ models) |
| `orcarouter` | Various | Universal fallback via OrcaRouter gateway |
## Provider-Aware Routing (v4.8)
Claude Octopus now intelligently routes tasks based on your subscription tiers and costs.
### Provider Subscription Tiers
| Provider | Tiers | Monthly Cost | Capabilities |
|----------|-------|--------------|--------------|
| **Codex/OpenAI** | Free, Plus, Pro, API | $0-200 | code, chat, review |
| **Antigravity** | Google access/subscription | Included with access | code, analysis, external review |
| **Claude** | Pro, Max 5x, Max 20x, API | $20-200 | code, chat, analysis, long-context |
| **OpenRouter** | Pay-per-use | Variable | 400+ models, routing variants |
| **OrcaRouter** | Pay-per-use | Variable | Single gateway, namespaced model IDs |
### Cost Optimization Strategies
| Strategy | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| `balanced` (default) | Smart mix of cost and quality |
| `cost-first` | Prefer cheapest capable provider |
| `quality-first` | Prefer highest-tier provider |
**Example:** If your Google seat includes Antigravity access, the system can prefer AGY for analysis without invoking the retired Gemini CLI.
### Routing CLI Flags
```bash
# Force a specific provider
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh --provider agy auto "analyze code structure"
# Prefer cheapest option
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh --cost-first auto "research best practices"
# Prefer highest quality
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh --quality-first auto "complex refactoring task"
# OpenRouter routing variants
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh --openrouter-nitro auto "quick task" # Fastest
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh --openrouter-floor auto "bulk task" # Cheapest
```
### Configuration
Provider tiers are configured during `setup` or via the providers config file:
```bash
# Run setup wizard (includes provider tier steps)
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh setup
# View current provider status
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh status
```
Configuration file: `~/.claude-octopus/.providers-config`
```yaml
version: "2.0"
providers:
codex:
installed: true
auth_method: "oauth"
subscription_tier: "plus" # free|plus|pro|api-only
cost_tier: "low" # free|low|medium|high|bundled|pay-per-use
agy:
installed: true
auth_method: "oauth"
subscription_tier: "google" # service-managed Google access
cost_tier: "bundled"
openrouter:
enabled: false
routing_preference: "default" # default|nitro|floor
orcarouter:
enabled: false
cost_optimization:
strategy: "balanced" # cost-first|quality-first|balanced
```
### OpenRouter Fallback
OpenRouter provides 400+ models as a universal fallback when direct external CLIs are unavailable:
```bash
# Set up OpenRouter API key
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="sk-or-..."
# Re-run setup to configure
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh setup
```
### OrcaRouter Fallback
OrcaRouter provides a single gateway to many models as a universal fallback when direct external CLIs are unavailable:
```bash
# Set up OrcaRouter API key
export ORCAROUTER_API_KEY="sk-orca-..."
# Re-run setup to configure
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh setup
```
## Workspace Structure
```
~/.claude-octopus/
├── results/
│ ├── probe-synthesis-*.md # Research findings
│ ├── grasp-consensus-*.md # Problem definitions
│ ├── tangle-validation-*.md # Quality gate reports
│ └── delivery-*.md # Final deliverables
├── logs/ # Execution logs
├── plans/ # Execution plan history
└── .gitignore
```
## Example Workflows
### Research-First Development
```bash
# 1. Explore the problem space
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh probe "Authentication patterns for microservices"
# 2. Define the approach (with probe context)
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh grasp "OAuth2 with JWT for our API" \
--context ~/.claude-octopus/results/probe-synthesis-*.md
# 3. Implement with validation
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh tangle "Implement OAuth2 authentication"
# 4. Deliver with quality checks
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh ink "Finalize auth implementation"
```
### Quick Build (Auto-Routed)
```bash
# Auto-detects "build" intent -> runs tangle + ink
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh auto "build a rate limiting middleware"
```
### Full Feature Development
```bash
# All 4 phases in one command
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh embrace "Create a user notification system with email and push support"
```
## Best Practices
1. **Start with `embrace`** for new features requiring exploration
2. **Use `probe` alone** when researching before committing to an approach
3. **Use `auto`** for smart routing based on your intent
4. **Chain phases** with `--context` for incremental workflows
5. **Run `preflight`** before long workflows to verify dependencies
6. **Review quality gates** in tangle output before proceeding to ink
## Troubleshooting
### Pre-flight check fails
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh preflight
# Verify: codex CLI, agy CLI, and task-relevant provider credentials
```
### Quality gate failures
Tangle phase requires 75% success rate. If failing:
- Break task into smaller subtasks
- Increase timeout with `-t 600`
- Check individual agent logs in `~/.claude-octopus/logs/`
### Reset workspace
```bash
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh clean
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh init
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!