Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate to Octopus only when multi-LLM diversity adds value
Scanned 5/28/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nyldn/claude-octopus --skill skill-native-escalation-routing --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Skill Native Escalation Routing?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nyldn-skill-native-escalation-routing)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: skill-native-escalation-routing
description: "Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate to Octopus only when multi-LLM diversity adds value"
---
# Native-First Escalation Routing
Use this skill when the user asks for repository initialization, code review, or security review and it is not yet clear whether Claude-native behavior is sufficient or whether Octopus escalation is warranted.
## Core Policy
Claude-native first:
- `/init`
- `/review`
- `/security-review`
Octopus for escalation:
- `/octo:review`
- `/octo:security`
- `/octo:debate`
- `/octo:multi`
## Route to Claude-Native First
Prefer Claude-native behavior when all of the following are true:
- the request maps directly to init, review, or security review
- the user did not ask for multiple model opinions
- the user did not ask for Codex, Gemini, or another provider explicitly
- the task does not require adversarial debate, consensus scoring, or external-provider specialization
Examples:
- "initialize this repo"
- "review my staged changes"
- "security review this auth module"
## Escalate to Octopus
Escalate when the user asks for or clearly benefits from:
- multiple model opinions
- adversarial review
- debate between providers
- provider-specific analysis
- autonomous codegen verification
- elevated rigor for complex or high-risk work
Examples:
- "get multiple model opinions on this PR"
- "have Codex and Gemini review this architecture"
- "do an adversarial security review"
- "verify this AI-generated implementation before merge"
## Execution Guidance
- If Claude-native is sufficient, do not wrap the task in Octopus unnecessarily.
- If the user explicitly invokes `/octo:review` or `/octo:security`, treat that as an escalation request.
- If the request is ambiguous, prefer Claude-native first and mention Octopus as the escalation path.
## Suggested User Framing
Use wording like:
> Claude-native first, Octopus for escalation. Use Claude-native `/review` or `/security-review` for ordinary requests. Use Octopus when you want multiple model opinions, adversarial review, or stricter multi-LLM workflows.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!