Skip to content
Back to skills

Skill Native Escalation Routing

ASecurity

Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate to Octopus only when multi-LLM diversity adds value

  • 4,171 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 28, 2026
ai-agentsgosecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 28, 2026

npx -y skills add nyldn/claude-octopus --skill skill-native-escalation-routing --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Skill Native Escalation Routing?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Skill Native Escalation Routing
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nyldn-skill-native-escalation-routing/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nyldn-skill-native-escalation-routing)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: skill-native-escalation-routing
description: "Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate to Octopus only when multi-LLM diversity adds value"
---

# Native-First Escalation Routing

Use this skill when the user asks for repository initialization, code review, or security review and it is not yet clear whether Claude-native behavior is sufficient or whether Octopus escalation is warranted.

## Core Policy

Claude-native first:

- `/init`
- `/review`
- `/security-review`

Octopus for escalation:

- `/octo:review`
- `/octo:security`
- `/octo:debate`
- `/octo:multi`

## Route to Claude-Native First

Prefer Claude-native behavior when all of the following are true:

- the request maps directly to init, review, or security review
- the user did not ask for multiple model opinions
- the user did not ask for Codex, Gemini, or another provider explicitly
- the task does not require adversarial debate, consensus scoring, or external-provider specialization

Examples:

- "initialize this repo"
- "review my staged changes"
- "security review this auth module"

## Escalate to Octopus

Escalate when the user asks for or clearly benefits from:

- multiple model opinions
- adversarial review
- debate between providers
- provider-specific analysis
- autonomous codegen verification
- elevated rigor for complex or high-risk work

Examples:

- "get multiple model opinions on this PR"
- "have Codex and Gemini review this architecture"
- "do an adversarial security review"
- "verify this AI-generated implementation before merge"

## Execution Guidance

- If Claude-native is sufficient, do not wrap the task in Octopus unnecessarily.
- If the user explicitly invokes `/octo:review` or `/octo:security`, treat that as an escalation request.
- If the request is ambiguous, prefer Claude-native first and mention Octopus as the escalation path.

## Suggested User Framing

Use wording like:

> Claude-native first, Octopus for escalation. Use Claude-native `/review` or `/security-review` for ordinary requests. Use Octopus when you want multiple model opinions, adversarial review, or stricter multi-LLM workflows.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.