Starter: compare model costs for a described task — maps task shape to the cheapest adequate seat and shows the price spread
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nyldn/claude-octopus --skill model-cost-compare --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Model Cost Compare?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nyldn-model-cost-compare)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: model-cost-compare
disable-model-invocation: true
description: "Starter: compare model costs for a described task — maps task shape to the cheapest adequate seat and shows the price spread"
---
# Model Cost Comparison (Starter Pack)
Answer "which model should I use for this, and what will it cost?" with numbers instead of vibes.
## When to use
The user describes a task (bulk refactor, deep review, quick lookup, long-context analysis) and wants the cheapest seat that is still adequate.
## Steps
1. **Classify the task.** Bucket it: mechanical (rename, format), standard coding, hard reasoning (architecture, security review), long-context (>200K tokens input), or web research.
2. **Estimate volume.** Rough input/output token estimate from the described scope (files touched × average size; state the assumption).
3. **Price the roster.** Using the cost table in CLAUDE.md ($/MTok input/output), compute the estimated cost for each plausible seat: Claude Opus 5 ($5/$25), Claude Sonnet 5 ($3/$15), Fable 5 ($10/$50, 1M context, opt-in), Codex GPT-5.6 Sol ($5/$30), Terra ($2.50/$15), Luna ($1/$6), Perplexity Sonar Pro ($3/$15), and the included-cost seats (agy, copilot, ollama, cursor-agent) at $0.
4. **Recommend one seat.** Pick the cheapest adequate option and defend it in two sentences. Mechanical work goes to included or budget seats; hard reasoning justifies Opus 5 at `high` effort; only a bounded judgment-class call (ambiguous architecture, API design, product tradeoffs) justifies Fable 5 at twice the Opus price.
5. **Check risk surfaces.** Regardless of the classification, escalate specifically to Opus 5 when the task touches API or schema contracts, security-sensitive code or CI configuration, release artifacts, user-facing UI, a new module, or a breaking change. Fable 5 remains limited to bounded judgment-class calls and is never the security-audit seat. Cheap-seat agreement never settles a judgment-class decision.
6. **Show the spread.** A three-row table: recommended seat, one cheaper-but-riskier option, one premium option, each with estimated dollars for this task.
## Guardrails
- Never recommend Fable 5 or fast-mode Opus by default; both are 2x standard Opus cost and are opt-in only.
- Never recommend Fable 5 for security audits; its safety classifiers can refuse offensive-security phrasing. Security review goes to Opus 5 (see `skills/blocks/fable5-prompting.md`).
- If the estimate exceeds $1, say so explicitly before any dispatch happens.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!