Skip to content
Back to skills

Nw Roadmap Review Checks

ASecurity

Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.

  • 615 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aigo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-roadmap-review-checks --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Nw Roadmap Review Checks?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Nw Roadmap Review Checks
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nwave-ai-nw-roadmap-review-checks/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nwave-ai-nw-roadmap-review-checks)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: nw-roadmap-review-checks
description: Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Roadmap Review Checks

Six mandatory checks for every roadmap review. Each produces a finding block.

## Check 1: External Validity

Verify completing all steps produces an INVOCABLE feature, not just existing code.

Criteria: at least one step targets entry point integration | acceptance tests invoke through driving ports | clear user invocation path after completion

Severity: BLOCKER if no integration step or invocation path. HIGH if tests at wrong boundary.

```
EXTERNAL VALIDITY CHECK: PASSED|FAILED

Issue: {missing wiring}
Consequence: {what happens without fix}
Required Action: {integration step to add}
```

## Check 2: AC Implementation Coupling

Scan AC for implementation details locking crafter into predetermined structure.

Detection: underscore-prefixed identifiers | method signatures with params | internal class references | specific return types

Severity: HIGH. Flag each coupled AC with rewrite.

- Coupled: `_install_des_module() copies src/des/`
- Rewritten: `DES module importable from installation target after install`

Rationale: AC = WHAT (observable behavior), never HOW (internal structure). Crafter decides during GREEN + REFACTOR.

## Check 3: Step Decomposition Ratio

Calculation: implementation steps / unique production files in `files_to_modify`

Thresholds: acceptable <= 2.0 | warning 2.0-2.5 | reject > 2.5

Identical pattern check: 3+ steps with identical AC differing by substitution -> require batching.

## Check 4: Implementation Code in Roadmap

Verify no implementation code. BLOCKER.

Detection: code snippets/algorithms in descriptions | method implementations in AC | pseudocode/logic | variable names, loops, conditionals

Architect defines WHAT; crafter decides HOW. Roadmap code prevents better solutions via TDD.

## Check 5: Roadmap Concision and Precision

Quantitative thresholds: total words 500 (1-3 steps) / 1500 (4-8) / 3000 (9-15) | step description max 50 words | AC max 5 per step, 30 words each | notes max 100 words

Verbosity detection: multi-sentence blocks -> bullets | qualifiers (comprehensive, robust) -> delete | motivational language -> delete | redundancy -> state once | tutorials -> delete, assume expertise

Precision: every AC single interpretation | testable outcome | business over technical jargon

Severity: BLOCKER if word count exceeds threshold.

## Check 6: Unit Test Boundary Validation

Verify unit tests respect hexagonal boundaries.

Rules: invoke through driving ports only | no domain entity unit tests | behavior focus | never import internal/private modules

- Wrong: `Tests verify TemplateValidator._validate_schema() handles edge cases`
- Right: `When invalid template provided to render_prompt(), ValidationError raised with clear message`

Severity: HIGH.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.