Fine-tune any HuggingFace CV / VLM / LLM model on local NVIDIA GPUs inside an NGC PyTorch container when no dedicated TAO model skill matches. Use when the user wants to fine-tune a HuggingFace model (full or LoRA), train a vision / VLM / LLM model end-to-end, generate a reproducible HF training pipeline, smoke-test a HuggingFace model locally before scale-up, push a fine-tuned model to the HF Hub with a model card, or emit a self-contained rerun skill for an existing HuggingFace finetune. Su...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill tao-finetune-huggingface-model --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tao Finetune Huggingface Model?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nvidia-tao-finetune-huggingface-model)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tao-finetune-huggingface-model
description: >
Fine-tune any HuggingFace CV / VLM / LLM model on local NVIDIA GPUs inside an
NGC PyTorch container when no dedicated TAO model skill matches. Use when the user wants to fine-tune a HuggingFace
model (full or LoRA), train a vision / VLM / LLM model end-to-end, generate a
reproducible HF training pipeline, smoke-test a HuggingFace model locally
before scale-up, push a fine-tuned model to the HF Hub with a model card, or
emit a self-contained rerun skill for an existing HuggingFace finetune.
Supports image classification, object detection, semantic / instance /
panoptic segmentation, depth estimation, image-text-to-text VLM (SFT / LoRA),
and LLM SFT / DPO / GRPO. Six-step workflow: inspect and qualify, hardware
and NGC image, research, generate and smoke, train + eval + infer, push and
emit rerun skill. Do not use for any Hugging Face model ID claimed by a
dedicated `skills/models/*` skill; the model skill and its declared execution
environment take precedence.
license: Apache-2.0
tags:
- finetuning
- huggingface
- nvidia-tao
- computer-vision
- training
compatibility: Requires docker + nvidia-container-toolkit, NVIDIA GPU (driver ≥ 545, ≥ 24 GB VRAM for ≤3B models), ~40 GB free disk. Optional credentials (read from the session environment, exported before launching) — HF_TOKEN is read only when the model/dataset is gated or `push_to_hub` is on; WANDB_API_KEY and WANDB_PROJECT only when WandB logging is enabled.
metadata:
author: NVIDIA Corporation
version: "0.1.0"
allowed-tools: Read Bash Write
---
<!-- Copyright (c) 2026, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0; see http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
# tao-finetune-huggingface-model
> **Standalone install?** If this session was not initialized by the TAO skill bank plugin, run the `tao-setup` skill first (host preflight, credentials, cross-skill discovery).
Local NVIDIA GPU fine-tuning for HuggingFace models, grounded in live-fetched
documentation with curated references as a fallback safety net. One NGC container,
a few focused scripts, one push to HF Hub. Follow the rules in this file; don't
improvise.
## Dedicated-model routing gate
Before Step 1 or any probe, image selection, package install, venv creation, or
training-code generation, resolve `model_id` against the packaged model-owner
registry. Use the absolute skill-bank root from which this file was loaded:
```bash
python <bank-root>/scripts/resolve_tao_model.py \
--skill-bank <bank-root> \
--model "$MODEL_ID" \
--format json
```
The resolver matches model metadata, including `huggingface_model_ids`,
`network_arch`, skill names, and legacy aliases. Routing is internal: a model ID
and task are enough. Never require prompt boilerplate about skills, containers,
or checkpoint formats.
- Exit `0`: stop this workflow and follow the owning model skill's environment,
action metadata, preflight, and checkpoint preparation.
- Exit `3`: no packaged model skill owns the ID. This is the only result that
permits Step 1 of the generic workflow.
- Any other nonzero exit: ownership discovery is broken or ambiguous. Stop and
resolve that error; do not silently fall back to generic Hugging Face
training.
Hugging Face hosting never overrides ownership. Do not use this workflow to
bypass a matched skill or ask the user to prescribe its internal preparation.
For example, `nvidia/Cosmos3-Nano` routes to `tao-finetune-cosmos-reason`.
Do not create a host training venv in this workflow. Its default execution path
is the NGC container documented below; any venv-based training path requires an
explicit user request.
**Order of authority (highest first):**
1. **User input** — explicit `model_id`, `dataset_id`, `training_method`, `config.yaml` overrides.
2. **Live research** — model card, HF repo example, author finetune script, HF task docs, paper; always fetched (Step 3 + `references/research-priorities.md`).
3. **Curated references** (`references/*.md`) — fallback when live research is silent/ambiguous.
4. **Your training-data memory** — last resort; suspect, cross-check against (2)/(3).
Conflict resolution between (2) and (3) and the source-line discrepancy note are
in `references/research-priorities.md`.
---
## Inputs
**Required:**
- `model_id` — HuggingFace model ID, e.g. `google/vit-base-patch16-224`
**Conditional credentials (read from the session environment, exported before launching when present):**
- `HF_TOKEN` — only when the model/dataset is **gated** (read) or `push_to_hub` is on (write); public + public + `push_to_hub: false` needs none. Value never read — presence-only via `[ -n "$HF_TOKEN" ]`.
- `WANDB_API_KEY`, `WANDB_PROJECT` — only when WandB is enabled; `WANDB_MODE=disabled` opts out.
**Dataset — exactly one:**
- `dataset_id` — HuggingFace dataset ID *(source: `hf`)*
- `local_dataset_path` — local folder or file *(source: `local`)*; optional
`local_dataset_format` ∈ {auto, imagefolder, coco, voc, jsonl, arrow, parquet,
csv} (default: auto-detect).
- *(omit)* — agent recommends popular datasets *(source: `recommend`)*
**Optional (have defaults):**
- `task_type` — auto-detected from config + model card
- `n_train=10000`, `n_eval=1000`, `n_epochs=3`, `lora_r=16`
- `output_dir=./output/<model_short_name>`
- `hf_model_repo` — push target; if unset and HF_TOKEN has write access,
auto-derived as `<whoami>/<model_short_name>-finetuned`.
- `push_to_hub=True` — set to `False` to skip
- `skip_baseline=False` — skip zero-shot baseline eval
**Optional deliverables (off by default):**
```yaml
emit_progress_log: false # output_dir/PROGRESS.md (per-step journal)
emit_report: false # reports/report.{pdf,html} with curves & samples
emit_unit_tests: false # tests/ with fake-data heterogeneous-batch tests
```
All values live in `output_dir/config.yaml`. Never hardcode in Python.
---
## Execution platform
This skill orchestrates *what* to run; the platform skills own *how* to run it on
a GPU host — read them first.
| Concern | Authoritative skill |
|---|---|
| GPU host runtime (driver 580, CUDA Toolkit 13.0, NVIDIA Container Toolkit 1.19.0) | [`tao-skill-bank:tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host`](../../platform/tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host/SKILL.md) |
| `docker run` flags, NGC auth, mounts, env passthrough | [`tao-skill-bank:tao-run-on-docker`](../../platform/tao-run-on-docker/SKILL.md) |
| Local Docker job preflight (daemon, GPU smoke) | [`tao-skill-bank:tao-run-on-local-docker`](../../platform/tao-run-on-local-docker/SKILL.md) |
**Default platform:** `local-docker` — build a one-off image (`run-<short>:latest`)
and run it on the local Docker daemon. Ask only when the user explicitly needs a
different backend (Brev remote GPU, SLURM/Kubernetes); then run that platform's
Preflight first and route the Steps 4–5 `docker run` commands through it. The
GPU-runtime and presence-only credential preflights (values never read), the
canonical `docker run` flag set, the `list_tao_platforms.py` selection command, and
the workflow-specific flags (`--entrypoint /bin/bash -lc`, `PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF`,
`--name hft_train`) are in `references/workflow-intake-preflight.md`.
---
## References — fallback safety net
Consulted **only** when live research is silent, ambiguous, or unavailable; live
docs always win for the specific model and current API. Each step links the
references it needs; full catalog in `references/detailed-workflow.md`.
Always-on: `core-rules.md`, `error-playbook.md`, `compat-workarounds.md`,
`model-discovery.md`, `dataset-recommendations.md`, `dataset-sources.md`,
`dataset-patterns.md`, `hardware-container.md`, `research-priorities.md`,
`cv-scripts.md`, `vlm-scripts.md`, `docker-runs.md`, `hub-push.md`,
`pipeline-skill-template.md`, `deliverables.md`. Opt-in (when their flag/need
applies): `progress-tracking.md`, `testing.md`, `reporting.md`,
`workflow-intake-preflight.md`, `workflow-generate-train.md`, `workflow-push-rerun.md`.
**Rule:** before falling back, log the live source you tried and why it was
insufficient (`config.yaml` `notes:`, and PROGRESS.md if enabled). `[FETCH LIVE]`
markers in `cv-scripts.md` / `vlm-scripts.md` are a research checklist, not code to
inline — refetch the listed URL if a block has no Step 3 finding.
---
## Core rules
Non-negotiable behaviors. **Short version** (full enumeration —
hallucinated-imports list, never-without-approval list, full error-recovery and
hardware-sizing tables — in `references/core-rules.md`, consult before any
training-time decision):
- **Your HF-library knowledge is outdated.** Fetch live docs (model card, HF
repo example, task doc) before writing any ML code — don't generate trainer
args / collator / transforms from memory (Step 3).
- **Smoke-test on real data with `--max_steps 1`** before any full run; no batch
launches without a verified smoke.
- **Never silently substitute** model_id, dataset_id, or training_method — if
what the user asked for doesn't load, stop and ask.
- **Error recovery is minimal-change.** OOM → halve batch, double grad_accum,
enable gradient checkpointing (no LoRA switch without approval); NaN → reduce
LR 10×; flat loss → inspect collator; same error 3× → stop and ask. Don't loop.
- **Dataset columns verified BEFORE the collator** — rename in `prepare_data.py`;
restructuring needed → stop and ask.
- **Hardware-sizing thumb (bf16):** ≤3B → 24 GB, 7–13B → 80 GB, 30B+ → multi-GPU
or LoRA on 1× 80 GB, 70B+ → 8× 80 GB or LoRA. Full finetune won't fit and no
LoRA requested → ask before switching.
---
## Workflow — 6 steps
Single pass, sequential; each step has a clear gate before the next begins.
### Step 1 — Inspect & qualify
**Goal:** decide whether to proceed. Probe model + dataset, apply accept/reject,
register applicable compat fixes, write the initial `config.yaml`.
Prerequisites: `MODEL_ID`, optional `DATASET_ID` / `local_dataset_path`,
optional `HF_TOKEN`, `OUTPUT_DIR` (default `./output/<model_short_name>`). Probes
run in a CPU-only `python:3.12-slim` Docker container (bind-mounted `.probe/`
scratch) so the host needs no virtualenv — Docker must exist first. Docker-presence
guard, container env, full probe invocation, and the model/dataset probe scripts
are in `references/workflow-intake-preflight.md`, `references/model-discovery.md`,
and `references/dataset-sources.md`.
Probe requirements:
- Model: load `AutoConfig`, read model-card tags, detect task from
`architectures` + tags + card examples (fallback logging in `model-discovery.md`).
- Dataset: for recommended datasets, first present 3-5 choices from
`dataset-recommendations.md`; for local data, bind-mount read-only and use
`dataset-sources.md` format detection.
- Reject early if the model config fails, the task is out of scope, no recipe
source exists, or the dataset cannot load / match the task schema.
- Evaluate `compat-workarounds.md` against the model/task; defer hardware-dependent
rules to Step 2.
Write the initial `config.yaml` (`model_id`, `task`, `dataset_id` or
`local_dataset_path`, `research_sources: []` filled in Step 3,
`applicable_workarounds:` from Step 1, `notes: []` for reference fallbacks,
`push_to_hub: true` default — annotated template in
`references/workflow-intake-preflight.md`). Optionally `rm -rf "$OUTPUT_DIR/.probe"`
once the gate is met.
**Gate:** `config.yaml` exists with model, dataset, task, applicable_workarounds;
do not proceed if any field is missing.
---
### Step 2 — Hardware audit & NGC image
**Goal:** verify Docker + GPU + disk, pick the NGC PyTorch image live, finalize
hardware-dependent compat rules.
**2a. Audit (hard gate)** — three checks (commands in
`references/workflow-intake-preflight.md`):
1. GPU host runtime — `tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host`'s
`setup-nvidia-gpu-host.sh --backend docker --check-only`; on fail, ask approval
then re-run with `--install --yes`.
2. Free-disk soft-warn — override via `MIN_DISK_GB` (default 100 GB); recommend
≥ 100 GB for NGC base (~20 GB) + HF cache + checkpoints + data.
3. Conditional credential presence (from the session environment, values never
read) — `HF_TOKEN` only when gated or `push_to_hub` is on; `WANDB_*` only when
WandB is on.
**Do not proceed to Step 4 on a hard-fail** — Step 4's `docker build` pulls a
20+ GB NGC base, and a missing `nvidia-container-toolkit` only surfaces later as
`could not select device driver "" with capabilities: [[gpu]]`. Record `gpu_count`,
`gpu_name`, `driver_major`, `vram_gb_per_gpu` in `config.yaml`.
**2b. Pick NGC image (live):** from the NVIDIA Deep Learning Frameworks support
matrix (<https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/frameworks/support-matrix/index.html>),
PyTorch NGC container section, pick the highest-versioned image where
`Min driver ≤ detected driver_major` and container CUDA `≤` host CUDA Toolkit
(match closely so cuDNN / TensorRT line up). Do **not** reject an image for an
`aN`/`bN`/`rcN` PyTorch tag — NGC validates the full image; pick the newest
CUDA-aligned one and let `compat-workarounds.md` handle per-version issues. If the
matrix is unreachable, use the fallbacks in `references/hardware-container.md`;
default `nvcr.io/nvidia/pytorch:24.09-py3` <!-- unpinned: documented fallback --> (driver ≥ 545; SDPA+GQA bug — if
`num_key_value_heads < num_attention_heads`, set `attn_implementation: "eager"`).
Record `ngc_image` in `config.yaml`.
**2c. Re-evaluate hardware-dependent compat rules:** re-run the
`compat-workarounds.md` walk for entries whose `detect` needs `hw`; update
`applicable_workarounds:` in place.
**2d. Model-fit check:** estimate `param_bytes ≈ 2×param_count` (bf16); if
> 60% of `vram_gb_per_gpu × 1e9`, recommend LoRA in the user-facing summary.
**Gate:** `config.yaml` has `ngc_image`, `gpu_count`, `gpu_name`, `driver_major`,
`vram_gb_per_gpu`; hardware-dependent compat fixes recorded.
---
### Step 3 — Research the recipe
**Goal:** fetch the live recipe — training-data knowledge of
`transformers`/`trl`/`peft` is suspect, so Step 3 is non-negotiable. Walk
`references/research-priorities.md` in priority order (Priority 1 → 6); stop once
you have, for the detected task:
- `AutoModel` / processor class
- Train + eval transforms
- Collator
- `compute_metrics`
- Hyperparameter hints (LR, batch size, epochs, scheduler)
Record findings in `meta/recipe.md`, append source URLs to
`config.yaml: research_sources:`. A slot with no live finding falls back to the
matching scaffold (`cv-scripts.md` / `vlm-scripts.md`), logged as "fallback to
scaffold — no live source for <slot>" under `notes:`. Conflict-resolution rules
are in `references/research-priorities.md`.
**Gate:** every required slot filled, with a source URL or scaffold-fallback note.
---
### Step 4 — Generate project & smoke-test
**Goal:** write all scripts, build the image, prepare data, run a 1-step smoke on
real data (one `docker build`, two `docker run`s).
**4a. Generate project files** in `output_dir/`: `config.yaml`, `Dockerfile`,
`requirements.txt`, `prepare_data.py`, `train.py`, `run_eval.py`, `infer.py`,
optional `merge_lora.py`, optional `tests/`, `.gitignore`. Live Step 3 research is
authority; `cv-scripts.md` / `vlm-scripts.md` give scaffold shape only. Apply every
`applicable_workarounds` entry as a Dockerfile block, requirement pin, config
override, or runtime env var. Hard rules: `run_eval.py` keeps that exact filename
(avoids colliding with the HF `evaluate` package); every generated `.py` starts
with the NVIDIA Apache-2.0 copyright header and any emitter fails when it is
missing; `emit_unit_tests: true` generates and runs tests per
`references/testing.md`. Script bodies, Dockerfile shape, and the emitter contract
are in `references/workflow-generate-train.md`.
**4b. Build, prepare, smoke** — `docker build -t run-<short>:latest .`, then
`prepare_data` and the `--smoke --max_steps 1` run (`references/docker-runs.md`
§1-3). Smoke pass criteria (in `logs/smoke.log`):
- No exception
- Loss is finite (not `0.0`, not `NaN`)
- `grad_norm > 0` at step 1
If `emit_unit_tests: true`, also run `pytest tests/` in the container. Any failure → STOP.
**4c. Preflight summary** — before full training, print and verify: reference URL,
dataset columns, Hub target, monitoring target, NGC image, hardware, smoke loss/grad norm.
**Gate:** project files written, image built, smoke PASSED, preflight has no
blank fields.
---
### Step 5 — Train, evaluate, infer
**Goal:** baseline eval, full training, post-train eval, optional LoRA merge, 5
inference samples (all commands: `references/docker-runs.md` §4-8).
| Sub-step | docker-runs.md | Skip if |
|---|---|---|
| 5a. Baseline eval (zero-shot) | §4 | `skip_baseline: true` |
| 5b. Full training (detached) | §5 | — |
| 5c. LoRA merge | §6 | not VLM+LoRA |
| 5d. Post-train eval | §7 | — |
| 5e. Inference (5 samples) | §8 | — |
Multi-GPU: prepend `torchrun --nproc_per_node=$gpu_count` to `python train.py`.
While training streams, watch `docker logs -f hft_train`: loss should drop within
10-20 steps; flat loss (collator/label-masking bug), NaN (LR too high), and OOM
all stop the run — recovery in `references/core-rules.md`. If `emit_report: true`,
run `report.py` after Step 5e per `references/reporting.md`.
**Gate:** all of:
- `checkpoints/final/` (or `checkpoints/merged/` for LoRA) exists
- `reports/eval_results.json` has a numeric primary metric
- `reports/baseline_results.json` exists (unless skipped)
- `reports/inference_samples/` has 5 samples
- wandb URL shows descending loss
---
### Step 6 — Push & emit rerun skill
**Goal:** publish the run and make it reproducible without re-research.
Push per `references/hub-push.md` (weights, model card, eval/baseline JSONs,
`config.yaml`, `Dockerfile`, `requirements.txt`, inference samples, reports when
emitted) unless `push_to_hub: false` is explicit. Emit
`<output_dir>/skills/run-<short>/SKILL.md` from
`references/pipeline-skill-template.md` — substitute every placeholder, include
full YAML metadata + the NVIDIA copyright HTML comment, and make any emitter fail
if those are missing.
**Gate (Done criteria):** all of:
- Step 5 gate met
- HF Hub repo exists at the resolved URL with weights + card + `results/`
(unless `push_to_hub: false`)
- `<output_dir>/skills/run-<short>/SKILL.md` exists, no `<placeholder>` left,
with metadata + copyright HTML comment per `pipeline-skill-template.md`
Final message: wandb URL, HF Hub URL, baseline -> fine-tuned primary metric,
`reports/inference_samples/`, and the rerun skill path.
---
## Error playbook
On a known runtime error, consult the symptom → minimal-fix table in
`references/error-playbook.md` (NGC entrypoint, PyTorch/Transformers regressions,
numpy ABI, Albumentations bbox, PEFT/checkpointing, LoRA target breadth, CV
augmentation gaps, OOM at step 0) before redesigning anything. When a row there
fires twice across runs, lift it into `compat-workarounds.md` with a `detect` rule
— auto-applied in Step 1 before the error can fire.
---
## Communication style
- Terse. No filler, no restating the request; one-word answers when appropriate.
- Always include direct Hub and wandb URLs when referencing artifacts.
- On error: state what went wrong, why, what you changed — no menus.
- Never present "Option A/B/C" for a request with a clear answer. Act.
## Example pipelines
- [tao-rerun-convnext-cifar10](references/tao-rerun-convnext-cifar10.md)
- [tao-rerun-detr-cppe5](references/tao-rerun-detr-cppe5.md)
- [tao-rerun-segformer-foodseg103](references/tao-rerun-segformer-foodseg103.md)
- [tao-rerun-smolvlm-vqav2](references/tao-rerun-smolvlm-vqav2.md)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!