Use this skill when the user has an existing DPDK application and is adding DOCA capabilities in-place — most commonly DOCA Flow hardware steering — without rewriting the data-plane in DOCA-native form: binding a DPDK port id to a `doca_dev` (`doca_dpdk_port_probe` / `doca_dpdk_port_as_dev`), converting `rte_mbuf` ↔ `doca_buf`, querying `doca_dpdk_cap_is_rep_port_supported`, or debugging `DOCA_ERROR_*` from a bridge call. Trigger even without "DOCA DPDK Bridge": "how do I add DOCA Flow to my ...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill doca-dpdk-bridge --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Doca Dpdk Bridge?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nvidia-doca-dpdk-bridge)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
license: Apache-2.0
name: doca-dpdk-bridge
description: >
Use this skill when the user has an existing DPDK application and is
adding DOCA capabilities in-place — most commonly DOCA Flow hardware
steering — without rewriting the data-plane in DOCA-native form:
binding a DPDK port id to a `doca_dev` (`doca_dpdk_port_probe` /
`doca_dpdk_port_as_dev`), converting `rte_mbuf` ↔ `doca_buf`,
querying `doca_dpdk_cap_is_rep_port_supported`, or debugging
`DOCA_ERROR_*` from a bridge call. Trigger even without "DOCA DPDK
Bridge": "how do I add DOCA Flow to my DPDK app", "make a DPDK port
visible to DOCA", "the bridge loads but every operation returns
errors", "pkg-config --exists doca-dpdk-bridge fails", or
"DOCA_ERROR_NOT_FOUND on port registration". Route elsewhere for
fresh DOCA-native packet I/O (doca-eth), flow-rule programming
(doca-flow), DOCA or DPDK install (doca-setup), or RDMA data
movement (doca-rdma).
metadata:
kind: library
compatibility: >
Requires DOCA SDK installed at /opt/mellanox/doca on Linux
(Ubuntu 22.04/24.04 or RHEL/SLES) with a BlueField DPU or
ConnectX NIC attached, plus a separate DPDK install whose
version falls within the bridge's matched-pair window. Reads
the user's local install via `pkg-config doca-dpdk-bridge` and
`pkg-config libdpdk`, and inspects
/opt/mellanox/doca/{lib,include,samples,applications}.
---
# DOCA DPDK Bridge
**Where to start:** This skill assumes DOCA is already installed,
DPDK is already installed, the user has an **existing DPDK
application**, and they want to **add DOCA capabilities to it
in-place** (most commonly DOCA Flow for hardware steering)
without migrating the data-plane to DOCA-native APIs. Open
[`TASKS.md`](TASKS.md) if the user wants to *do* something
(configure / build / modify / run / test / debug); open
[`CAPABILITIES.md`](CAPABILITIES.md) when the question is *what
the bridge can express* on this version. If the user has not
installed DOCA yet, route to
[`doca-setup`](../../doca-setup/SKILL.md) first. If the user is
**starting fresh** (no DPDK code yet) and just wants line-rate
packet I/O against DOCA, route to
[`doca-eth`](../doca-eth/SKILL.md) instead — the bridge exists
for the interop case, not the start-fresh case.
## Example questions this skill answers well
The CLASSES of DOCA DPDK Bridge questions this skill is built to
answer, each with one worked example. The agent should treat the
*class* as the load-bearing piece — the worked example is a
single instance.
- **"I have a DPDK app — how do I add DOCA Flow rules to it
without rewriting the data-plane?"** — worked example: *"my
packet-processing app already drives mbufs through `rte_eth_*`
ports; I want to install DOCA Flow steering rules on those
ports for HW offload"*. Answered by the bridge-vs-native
selection rule in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes`](CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
+ the port-handover workflow in
[`TASKS.md ## configure`](TASKS.md#configure) step 3.
- **"How do I make a DPDK port visible to DOCA?"** — worked
example: *"I have a DPDK port id from `rte_eth_dev_*`; how does
DOCA see it"*. Answered by the DPDK-port-id ↔ `doca_dev`
mapping (`doca_dpdk_port_probe` / `doca_dpdk_port_as_dev`) in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes`](CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
bridge-objects table + the binding workflow in
[`TASKS.md ## configure`](TASKS.md#configure) step 4.
- **"How do I move packets between DPDK mbufs and DOCA bufs?"** —
worked example: *"DPDK delivers an `rte_mbuf` to my fastpath; I
want a DOCA library to operate on the payload"*. Answered by
the mbuf ↔ DOCA-buf conversion shape in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes`](CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
+ the conversion-step workflow in
[`TASKS.md ## modify`](TASKS.md#modify).
- **"Is the bridge even installed and is its DPDK compatible
with my DOCA?"** — worked example: *"`pkg-config --exists
doca-dpdk-bridge` returns failure on a host that has DPDK
separately installed"*. Answered by the version-coupling rule
in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Version compatibility`](CAPABILITIES.md#version-compatibility)
+ the cap-check workflow in
[`TASKS.md ## configure`](TASKS.md#configure) step 1.
- **"Should I be using `doca-dpdk-bridge` or `doca-eth`?"** —
worked example: *"new project; I have not committed to DPDK
yet"*. Answered by the path-selection table in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes`](CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
bridge-vs-native row + the deferred-verbs note in
[`TASKS.md ## Deferred task verbs`](TASKS.md#deferred-task-verbs).
- **"What does this `DOCA_ERROR_*` from a bridge call mean and
which layer caused it?"** — worked example: *"`DOCA_ERROR_NOT_FOUND`
on a port-registration call after the DPDK port came up
cleanly"*. Answered by the bridge overlay on the cross-library
taxonomy in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Error taxonomy`](CAPABILITIES.md#error-taxonomy)
+ the layered ladder in
[`TASKS.md ## debug`](TASKS.md#debug) that escalates to
[`doca-debug`](../../doca-debug/SKILL.md).
## Audience
This skill serves **external developers who already maintain a
DPDK-based packet-processing application** — i.e., users whose
data-plane already drives `rte_eth_*` ports and `rte_mbuf`
buffers — and who want to **add DOCA capabilities** (most
commonly hardware steering via DOCA Flow) by linking the bridge
into the same process. It is *not* for users starting a fresh
DOCA-native project (route to [`doca-eth`](../doca-eth/SKILL.md))
and *not* for users running pure DPDK with no interest in DOCA
(no skill in this bundle applies). It is also not for NVIDIA
developers contributing to DOCA DPDK Bridge itself.
**Language scope.** DOCA DPDK Bridge ships as a C library with
`pkg-config` module name `doca-dpdk-bridge` (the agent must
confirm the spelling against the user's install via
`pkg-config --exists doca-dpdk-bridge`; some DOCA releases use a
slightly different module name and the agent must not guess).
The shipped samples are written in C. C and C++ consumers are
the canonical case; the worked examples in `TASKS.md` assume
that path. Other-language consumers (Rust, Go, Python, …)
typically do not use this bridge — DPDK itself is C-shaped, and
a non-C DPDK app is rare; if the user is in that minority, the
skill's contribution is to keep the port-handover, capability,
permission, and error-taxonomy guidance language-neutral and
route them to the public C ABI as the authoritative surface.
## When to load this skill
Load this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA DPDK Bridge
work, in any language. Concretely:
- The user has an EXISTING DPDK application (their data-plane
already drives `rte_eth_dev_*` ports and `rte_mbuf` buffers),
and they want to layer DOCA on top — adding DOCA Flow rules,
feeding packets into a DOCA accelerator (Compress, AES-GCM, …),
or wiring a DOCA service into the same process.
- The user needs to bind a DPDK port id to a `doca_dev` (via
`doca_dpdk_port_probe` / `doca_dpdk_port_as_dev`) so DOCA Core
/ DOCA Flow can operate on the same physical port.
- The user needs to convert between DPDK mbufs and DOCA-bufs at
the data-plane boundary, and is asking about the conversion
helpers and their cost.
- The user is debugging a `DOCA_ERROR_*` returned from a bridge
call (lifecycle vs. permission vs. capability vs. DPDK-port-not-
registered vs. mbuf-conversion-failed) and the layered DPDK ↔
DOCA stack underneath.
- The user is hitting cross-version pain: their DPDK install and
their DOCA install are not the matched pair the bridge expects.
- The user is asking *"native `doca-eth` or `doca-dpdk-bridge`?"*
and the agent needs the path-selection rule.
Do **not** load this skill for general DOCA orientation, install
of DOCA itself, fresh DOCA-native packet I/O (use
[`doca-eth`](../doca-eth/SKILL.md)), flow-rule programming on
its own (use [`doca-flow`](../doca-flow/SKILL.md)), host ↔ DPU
control messaging (use [`doca-comch`](../doca-comch/SKILL.md)),
or RDMA data movement (use [`doca-rdma`](../doca-rdma/SKILL.md)).
For DOCA documentation orientation, use
[`doca-public-knowledge-map`](../../doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md).
## What this skill provides
This is a **thin loader**. The body keeps only the orientation
needed to pick the right next file. The substantive bridge-
specific material lives in two companion files:
- `CAPABILITIES.md` — what the DOCA DPDK Bridge can express on
this version: the bridge-vs-native selection rule (when to
use `doca-dpdk-bridge` vs native `doca-eth`), the
bridge-object surface (DPDK-port-id ↔ `doca_dev` mapping, the
`doca_dpdk_mempool` mbuf ↔ DOCA-buf conversion), the
capability-query surface (the single
`doca_dpdk_cap_is_rep_port_supported`), the bridge error taxonomy
(mapped onto the cross-library `DOCA_ERROR_*` set), the
observability surface (DPDK-side counters + DOCA-side PE
events), and the safety policy that gates the matched-pair
DPDK ↔ DOCA version coupling, the EAL-must-be-up
precondition, and DPDK-side privileges.
- `TASKS.md` — step-by-step workflows for the six in-scope
bridge verbs: `configure`, `build`, `modify`, `run`, `test`,
`debug`. Plus a `Deferred task verbs` block that points
out-of-scope questions at the right next skill, and a
`Command appendix` of the recurring commands the agent
reaches for.
The skill assumes a host or BlueField where DOCA AND DPDK are
already installed at the standard locations and the user has the
privileges their public install profile expects (typically sudo
or `mlnx`-group membership for DOCA, plus the DPDK-side
privileges to mount hugepages, bind PCIe ports, and open the
target `rte_eth` device). It does not cover installing DOCA —
that path goes through [`doca-setup`](../../doca-setup/SKILL.md);
it does not cover installing or learning DPDK itself — that
belongs in upstream DPDK documentation reachable via
[`doca-public-knowledge-map`](../../doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md).
## What this skill deliberately does not ship
This skill is **agent guidance**, not a samples or templates
bundle. To keep the boundary clean, it deliberately does not
contain — and pull requests should not add:
- **Pre-written DOCA DPDK Bridge application source code, in any
language.** The verified bridge source code is the bridge
usage inside the shipped C DOCA Flow samples at
`/opt/mellanox/doca/samples/doca_flow/` (e.g. `flow_common.c`,
which calls `doca_dpdk_port_probe()` / `doca_dpdk_port_as_dev()`),
plus the canonical reference applications that pair DPDK +
DOCA Flow (see
[`doca-public-knowledge-map`](../../doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md)
for the reference-applications index). The agent's job is to
route the user to those files and prescribe a minimum-diff
modification on them via the universal modify-a-sample
workflow in
[`doca-programming-guide`](../../doca-programming-guide/SKILL.md),
layered with the bridge-specific overrides in
[`TASKS.md ## modify`](TASKS.md#modify).
- **Standalone build manifests** (`meson.build`,
`CMakeLists.txt`, `Cargo.toml`, …) parked inside the skill.
The agent constructs the build manifest *in the user's project
directory* against the user's installed DOCA + DPDK, where
`pkg-config --modversion doca-dpdk-bridge` and
`pkg-config --modversion libdpdk` are the source of truth.
- **A `samples/`, `bindings/`, or `reference/` subtree** of any
kind. A mock or incomplete artifact in this skill's tree, even
one labeled "reference", is misleading: users will read it as
buildable.
## Loading order
1. Read this `SKILL.md` first to confirm the user's question is
in scope (existing DPDK app + wants DOCA on top — not fresh).
2. **For the bridge capability matrix, the bridge-vs-native
selection rule, port-handover surface, capability-query rules,
error taxonomy, observability, and safety policy, see
[CAPABILITIES.md](CAPABILITIES.md).**
3. **For step-by-step workflows — configure, build, modify, run,
test, debug — see [TASKS.md](TASKS.md).**
Both companion files cross-link to each other,
[`doca-version`](../../doca-version/SKILL.md) for the canonical
DOCA version-handling rules,
[`doca-eth`](../doca-eth/SKILL.md) for the start-fresh path that
is the bridge's deliberate alternative,
[`doca-flow`](../doca-flow/SKILL.md) for the steering library
that is the most common reason to use this bridge in the first
place, and
[`doca-public-knowledge-map`](../../doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md)
whenever the right answer is "look it up in the public docs or
the installed package layout" rather than "bridge-specific
guidance".
## Related skills
- [`doca-public-knowledge-map`](../../doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md) —
the routing table for every public DOCA documentation source
and the on-disk layout of an installed DOCA package. The
bridge URL slug is `DOCA-DPDK-Bridge`. Reference applications
that pair DPDK + DOCA Flow (the canonical adopters of this
bridge) are reachable from the same map's reference-
applications index.
- [`doca-setup`](../../doca-setup/SKILL.md) — env preparation,
install verification, hugepage mounts (DPDK requirement),
port-state checks (`devlink dev show`, `ip link`), permission
and group-membership requirements for opening a `doca_dev`
AND for binding PCIe ports under DPDK. This skill assumes its
preconditions are satisfied.
- [`doca-version`](../../doca-version/SKILL.md) — canonical
DOCA version-handling rules. This skill's `## Version
compatibility` cross-links the four-way match rule and adds
only the bridge-specific overlay (DPDK ↔ DOCA matched-pair
coupling).
- [`doca-structured-tools-contract`](../../doca-structured-tools-contract/SKILL.md) —
the bundle's structured-tools precedence rule (detect / prefer
/ fall back / report). The Command appendix in
[TASKS.md](TASKS.md) honors this contract.
- [`doca-programming-guide`](../../doca-programming-guide/SKILL.md) —
general DOCA programming patterns shared by every library:
the canonical `pkg-config` + meson build pattern, the
universal modify-a-shipped-sample first-app workflow, the
universal lifecycle, the cross-library `DOCA_ERROR_*`
taxonomy, and the program-side debug order. This skill layers
bridge specifics on top.
- [`doca-eth`](../doca-eth/SKILL.md) — the **alternative path**
for users starting fresh: pure DOCA-native queue I/O via
`doca_eth_rxq` / `doca_eth_txq` with no DPDK in the picture.
The bridge exists *because* migrating an existing DPDK app to
`doca-eth` is often the wrong tradeoff; for a new project
with no DPDK lock-in, `doca-eth` is the right choice.
- [`doca-flow`](../doca-flow/SKILL.md) — the steering library
that is the most common reason a DPDK app reaches for this
bridge. The bridge binds a DPDK port id to a `doca_dev`;
DOCA Flow programs steering rules onto that `doca_dev`. The two
libraries are designed to compose.
- [`doca-debug`](../../doca-debug/SKILL.md) — the cross-cutting
debug ladder (install / version / build / link / runtime /
program / driver). Bridge-specific debug (DPDK ↔ DOCA version
drift, port-not-registered symptoms, mbuf-conversion failures)
overlays on top of that ladder.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!