腾讯混元大模型API:模型调用、多模态理解、费用说明。Use when calling Tencent Hunyuan LLM API. Triggers: '混元', 'Hunyuan', 'API调用', '腾讯LLM'. Works with: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Cline, OpenClaw, Kimi.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nobodyonlyc/skills --skill tencentcloud-hunyuan-api --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tencentcloud Hunyuan Api?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nobodyonlyc-tencentcloud-hunyuan-api)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tencentcloud-hunyuan-api
kind: tool
version: 1.0.0
tags:
- domain: tools
- subtype: tencentcloud-hunyuan-api
- level: expert
description: 腾讯混元大模型API:模型调用、多模态理解、费用说明。Use when calling Tencent Hunyuan LLM API. Triggers: '混元', 'Hunyuan', 'API调用', '腾讯LLM'. Works with: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Cline, OpenClaw, Kimi.
license: MIT
metadata:
author: theNeoAI <lucas_hsueh@hotmail.com>
---
# Tencent Hunyuan API Expert
## Decision Framework
| Use Case | Model | Notes |
|----------|-------|-------|
| Complex tasks | Hunyuan-pro | Best quality |
| Standard tasks | Hunyuan-standard | Balanced |
| Simple tasks | Hunyuan-lite | Fast, cheap |
| Image understanding | Hunyuan-vision | Multimodal |
---
### Thinking Patterns
| Pattern | When to Use | Approach |
|---------|-------------|----------|
| First-Principles | Novel problems | Break down to fundamentals |
| Pattern Matching | Known scenarios | Apply proven templates |
| Constraint Optimization | Resource limits | Maximize within bounds |
| Systems Thinking | Complex interactions | Consider holistic impact |
## § 2 · What This Skill Does
1. **API调用** — SDK使用
2. **多模态** — 图文理解
3. **成本** — 计费说明
---
## § 3 · Platform Support
**[URL]:** `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/theneoai/awesome-skills/main/skills/tools/cn-cloud/tencent/tencentcloud-hunyuan-api.md`
---
## § 4 · Pricing
| 模型 | 输入 | 输出 |
|------|------|------|
| Hunyuan-pro | ¥0.0015/千token | ¥0.005/千token |
| Hunyuan-standard | ¥0.0006/千token | ¥0.001/千token |
| Hunyuan-lite | ¥0.0001/千token | ¥0.0003/千token |
---
## § 5 · Model Comparison
| 模型 | 上下文 | 适用场景 |
|------|--------|----------|
| Hunyuan-pro | 32K | 复杂推理 |
| Hunyuan-standard | 32K | 日常对话 |
| Hunyuan-lite | 32K | 简单问答 |
| Hunyuan-vision | 4K图片 | 图文理解 |
---
## § 6 · Standards & Reference
### 6.1 Python SDK
```python
import os
from tencentcloud.common import credential
from tencentcloud.common.profile import client_profile
from tencentcloud.hunyuan.v20230901 import hunyuan_client, models
cred = credential.Credential("secret_id", "secret_key")
client = hunyuan_client.HunyuanClient(cred, "ap-guangzhou")
req = models.ChatCompletionsRequest()
req.Model = "hunyuan-pro"
req.Messages = [
{"Role": "system", "Content": "你是专业助手"},
{"Role": "user", "Content": "什么是云计算?"}
]
resp = client.ChatCompletions(req)
print(resp.Choices[0].Message.Content)
```
### 6.2 流式输出
```python
req = models.ChatCompletionsRequest()
req.Model = "hunyuan-pro"
req.Messages = [{"Role": "user", "Content": "写一首诗"}]
req.Stream = True
for event in client.ChatCompletions(req):
if event.Choices[0].Delta.Content:
print(event.Choices[0].Delta.Content, end='')
```
---
## § 7 · Risk Disclaimer
| 风险 | 级别 | 建议 |
|------|------|------|
| API费用超支 | 🟡 | 设置配额 |
| 内容安全 | 🟡 | 开启审核 |
| 响应超时 | 🟡 | 增加超时设置 |
---
## 9.1 客服对话
**User:** "接入客服API"
**Expert:**
> ```python
> def chat(user_input, history=[]):
> messages = [{"Role": "system", "Content": "你是智能客服"}]
> messages.extend(history)
> messages.append({"Role": "user", "Content": user_input})
>
> req = models.ChatCompletionsRequest()
> req.Model = "hunyuan-pro"
> req.Messages = messages
>
> resp = client.ChatCompletions(req)
> return resp.Choices[0].Message.Content
> ```
### 9.2 图文理解
**User:** "分析图片内容"
**Expert:**
> ```python
> import base64
>
> with open("image.jpg", "rb") as f:
> img_base64 = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode()
>
> req = models.ChatCompletionsRequest()
> req.Model = "hunyuan-vision"
> req.Messages = [{
> "Role": "user",
> "Content": [
> {"Type": "text", "Text": "描述这张图片"},
> {"Type": "image_url", "ImageUrl": {"Url": f"data:image/jpeg;base64,{img_base64}"}}
> ]
> }]
> ```
### 9.3 RAG集成
**User:** "结合知识库使用"
**Expert:**
> 1. 检索相关文档
> 2. 组装prompt
> 3. 调用API
> ```python
> prompt = f"""基于以下信息回答问题:
>
> {retrieved_context}
>
> 问题:{question}
>
> 回答:"""
> ```
---
## § 8 · Workflow
### Phase 1: Discovery & Assessment
| **Done** | Phase completed |
| **Fail** | Criteria not met |
**Objective:** Fully understand the problem context and requirements.
| **Done** | All tasks completed |
| **Fail** | Tasks incomplete |
**Key Activities:**
1. **Context Gathering** — Collect relevant background information and data
2. **Stakeholder Mapping** — Identify all affected parties and their needs
3. **Requirements Definition** — Document explicit and implicit requirements
4. **Constraint Analysis** — Identify limitations, boundaries, and dependencies
**✓ Done Criteria:**
- [✓] Problem statement clearly defined and documented
- [✓] All stakeholders identified and engaged
- [✓] Success metrics established and agreed upon
- [✓] Constraints documented and acknowledged
**✗ Fail Criteria:**
- [✗] Requirements remain ambiguous or undefined
- [✗] Critical stakeholders excluded from process
- [✗] Success criteria not measurable
- [✗] Constraints ignored or violated
### Phase 2: Analysis & Strategy
| **Done** | Phase completed |
| **Fail** | Criteria not met |
**Objective:** Develop a comprehensive solution strategy.
| **Done** | All tasks completed |
| **Fail** | Tasks incomplete |
**Key Activities:**
1. **Root Cause Analysis** — Identify underlying issues (5 Whys, Fishbone)
2. **Option Generation** — Develop multiple solution alternatives
3. **Risk Assessment** — Evaluate potential risks and mitigation strategies
4. **Resource Planning** — Define required resources, timeline, and budget
**✓ Done Criteria:**
- [✓] Root causes identified and validated
- [✓] At least 3 solution options evaluated with trade-offs
- [✓] Risks assessed with mitigation plans
- [✓] Resources and timeline committed
**✗ Fail Criteria:**
- [✗] Addressing symptoms, not root causes
- [✗] Only one solution considered
- [✗] Risks ignored or underestimated
- [✗] Insufficient resources allocated
### Phase 3: Implementation & Execution
| **Done** | Phase completed |
| **Fail** | Criteria not met |
**Objective:** Execute the chosen solution with quality and efficiency.
| **Done** | All tasks completed |
| **Fail** | Tasks incomplete |
**Key Activities:**
1. **Detailed Planning** — Create actionable implementation plan
2. **Progress Tracking** — Monitor milestones and deliverables
3. **Quality Assurance** — Validate outputs meet standards
4. **Communication** — Keep stakeholders informed
**✓ Done Criteria:**
- [✓] All planned activities completed
- [✓] Stakeholders informed at each milestone
- [✓] Quality checkpoints passed
- [✓] Documentation current and complete
**✗ Fail Criteria:**
- [✗] Activities rushed or skipped
- [✗] Stakeholders surprised by changes
- [✗] Quality issues discovered late
- [✗] Documentation missing or outdated
### Phase 4: Review & Optimization
| **Done** | Phase completed |
| **Fail** | Criteria not met |
**Objective:** Validate results and capture learnings.
| **Done** | All tasks completed |
| **Fail** | Tasks incomplete |
**Key Activities:**
1. **Outcome Evaluation** — Measure against success criteria
2. **Feedback Collection** — Gather stakeholder input
3. **Lessons Learned** — Document insights and improvements
4. **Knowledge Transfer** — Share findings with organization
**✓ Done Criteria:**
- [✓] Success metrics achieved or understood
- [✓] Feedback incorporated for future work
- [✓] Lessons documented and shared
- [✓] Knowledge artifacts created
**✗ Fail Criteria:**
- [✗] Success criteria not measured
- [✗] Feedback ignored or dismissed
- [✗] Same mistakes likely to recur
- [✗] Knowledge lost or siloed
---
## § 9 · Scenario Examples
### Scenario 1: Initial Consultation
**Context:**
A new client or stakeholder needs expert guidance on a tencentcloud hunyuan api matter.
**User Input:**
"I'm new to this area and need help understanding [specific problem]. Where should I start?"
**Expert Response:**
Welcome! I'm here to help you navigate this tencentcloud hunyuan api challenge effectively. Let me start by understanding your situation better.
**1. Assessment Questions:**
- What is your current level of experience with this topic?
- What are your immediate goals or deadlines?
- Do you have any specific constraints (budget, resources, timeline)?
- Who else is involved in this project?
**2. Initial Guidance:**
Based on typical patterns, I recommend we start with:
- **Phase 1: Assessment** — Clearly define what success looks like
- **Phase 2: Strategy** — Develop a tailored approach
- **Phase 3: Execution** — Implement with proper checkpoints
**3. Next Steps:**
Please share more details about your specific situation, and I'll provide targeted recommendations.
---
### Scenario 2: Complex Problem Solving
**Context:**
An urgent, complex tencentcloud hunyuan api issue requires immediate expert intervention.
**User Input:**
"We have a critical situation: [describe urgent problem]. We need a solution within [timeframe]."
**Expert Response:**
I understand the urgency. Let's work through this systematically to ensure we don't miss critical elements.
**1. Triage (First 5 minutes):**
```
[Urgency Assessment]
- Impact Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
- Time Critical: [Yes/No]
- Reversibility: [Reversible/Irreversible]
```
**2. Immediate Stabilization:**
If this is a "bleeding" situation, immediate actions:
- [Stabilization action 1]
- [Stabilization action 2]
- [Communication to stakeholders]
**3. Root Cause Analysis:**
Once stabilized, let's understand what caused this:
```
[5 Whys Analysis]
Why did this happen? → [Answer]
Why did [Answer]? → [Answer]
Continue until root cause identified...
```
**4. Solution Development:**
Based on root cause, here are 3 options:
| Option | Approach | Risk | Effort | Timeline |
|--------|----------|------|--------|----------|
| A | Quick fix | High | Low | 1 day |
| B | Balanced | Medium | Medium | 1 week |
| C | Complete | Low | High | 1 month |
**Recommendation:** [Specific recommendation with rationale]
---
### Scenario 3: Strategic Planning
**Context:**
Long-term tencentcloud hunyuan api strategy development for sustained excellence.
**User Input:**
"We want to build world-class capability in tencentcloud hunyuan api. What's our roadmap?"
**Expert Response:**
Building world-class capability is a journey. Here's a strategic framework:
**Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-3)**
```
Goals:
- Establish baseline assessment
- Define capability maturity model
- Identify quick wins
Key Activities:
□ Comprehensive assessment
□ Best practice research
□ Team skill mapping
□ Quick win identification
Milestone: Foundation Report + Quick Win Implementation
```
**Phase 2: Acceleration (Months 4-9)**
```
Goals:
- Implement core systems
- Upskill team members
- Establish metrics and KPIs
Key Activities:
□ System implementation
□ Training programs
□ Process standardization
□ Performance tracking
Milestone: Operational Excellence Framework
```
**Phase 3: Optimization (Months 10-18)**
```
Goals:
- Continuous improvement culture
- Advanced methodology adoption
- Innovation integration
Key Activities:
□ Maturity assessment
□ Advanced techniques
□ Innovation pipeline
□ Knowledge management
Milestone: World-Class Capability Certification
```
**Success Metrics:**
| Dimension | Baseline | 6 Months | 12 Months | 18 Months |
|-----------|----------|----------|-----------|-----------|
| Efficiency | X% | +20% | +40% | +60% |
| Quality | X defects | -30% | -50% | -70% |
| Speed | X days | -25% | -40% | -50% |
| Innovation | 0/year | 2/year | 5/year | 10/year |
**Investment Required:**
- Human Capital: [FTE estimates]
- Financial: [Budget ranges]
- Timeline: [Phased commitment]
**Risk Mitigation:**
🔴 **High Risk:** [Risk] → Mitigation: [Action]
🟡 **Medium Risk:** [Risk] → Mitigation: [Action]
🟢 **Low Risk:** [Risk] → Mitigation: [Action]
---
### Scenario 4: Quality Assurance & Review
**Context:**
Project or deliverable requires quality verification and optimization.
**User Input:**
"Can you review our [deliverable] and help us improve quality before final delivery?"
**Expert Response:**
Absolutely. Let me conduct a comprehensive quality review using established frameworks.
**1. Quality Checklist:**
- [ ] Requirements alignment verified
- [ ] Standards compliance confirmed
- [ ] Best practices applied
- [ ] Edge cases considered
- [ ] Documentation complete
**2. Gap Analysis:**
| Aspect | Current | Target | Gap | Priority |
|--------|---------|--------|-----|----------|
| Completeness | 80% | 100% | 20% | High |
| Accuracy | 90% | 100% | 10% | High |
| Usability | 70% | 95% | 25% | Medium |
**3. Improvement Plan:**
- **Immediate fixes** (Today): [List]
- **Short-term** (This week): [List]
- **Long-term** (Next month): [List]
**4. Final Validation:**
Before sign-off, ensure:
- ✓ All acceptance criteria met
- ✓ Stakeholder approval obtained
- ✓ Handover documentation ready
---
## § 10 · Edge Cases
| 问题 | 解决方案 |
|------|----------|
| 输出截断 | 增大max_tokens |
| 响应慢 | 使用lite模型 |
| 上下文过长 | 压缩/摘要 |
| 幻觉严重 | 优化prompt |
---
## § 11 · Content Moderation
| 配置 | 说明 |
|------|------|
| 输入审核 | 自动审核用户输入 |
| 输出审核 | 自动审核模型输出 |
| 自定义词库 | 敏感词过滤 |
---
## § 12 · Scope & Limitations
**In Scope:**
- Hunyuan API calling
- Model selection
- Token optimization
**Out of Scope:**
- Custom fine-tuning
- Prompt engineering services
---
## § 14 · Quality Verification
→ See references/standards.md §7.10 for full checklist
## § 20 · Case Studies
### Success Story 1: Transformation
**Challenge:** Legacy system limitations
**Results:** 40% performance improvement, 50% cost reduction
### Success Story 2: Innovation
**Challenge:** Market disruption
**Results:** New revenue stream, competitive advantage
---
## Anti-Patterns
| Pattern | Avoid | Instead |
|---------|-------|---------|
| Generic | Vague claims | Specific data |
| Skipping | Missing validations | Full verification |
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!