Use when the code's vocabulary does not match the business's. Establishes a ubiquitous language, models domain concepts as explicit types, and identifies bounded contexts.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection --skill domain-modeling --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Domain Modeling?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nimadorostkar-domain-modeling)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: domain-modeling
description: Use when the code's vocabulary does not match the business's. Establishes a ubiquitous language, models domain concepts as explicit types, and identifies bounded contexts.
metadata:
category: development
version: 1.0.0
tags: [ddd, domain-model, ubiquitous-language, bounded-context]
---
# Domain Modeling
## Purpose
Make the code speak the business's language precisely. Most long-lived complexity comes from a mismatch between the words the business uses and the structures the code has — where "user" means four different things and none of them are named.
## When to Use
- The same concept has different names in code, in the database, and in conversation.
- A single model class is used by three subsystems that each need something different from it.
- New requirements consistently require changes in unrelated modules.
- Designing a new subsystem in a domain with real business rules.
## Capabilities
- Ubiquitous language: a shared, enforced vocabulary between code and domain experts.
- Modeling entities, value objects, and aggregates with clear invariants.
- Bounded-context identification and mapping.
- Replacing primitive obsession with domain types.
- Making illegal states unrepresentable.
## Inputs
- The domain vocabulary, ideally from the people who use it daily.
- The current model and where it hurts.
- The business rules, especially the ones that are currently enforced by convention.
## Outputs
- A glossary of terms, each with exactly one meaning.
- Domain types that carry their invariants.
- Named bounded contexts and the translation between them.
## Workflow
1. **Collect the vocabulary** — Listen to how the domain experts speak. When they say "a subscription lapses", the code should have a `lapse()` and not a `status = 3`.
2. **Find the collisions** — The same word meaning two things is the highest-value finding. "Order" in fulfilment and "Order" in billing are usually different concepts.
3. **Draw the context boundaries** — Where the meaning of a word changes, a context boundary exists. Draw it explicitly and translate at the edge.
4. **Replace primitives with types** — `Money`, `EmailAddress`, `SubscriptionId`. A type that validates on construction cannot be invalid downstream.
5. **Move invariants into the model** — If a rule is currently enforced in a controller, the model permits an invalid state. Move it.
6. **Rename ruthlessly** — Code that uses a word the business does not use is code the business cannot verify.
## Best Practices
- One word, one meaning, per context. If you need to say "billing order" to be clear, the type should be `BillingOrder`.
- A value object with no identity should be immutable and compared by value. `Money(1000, "USD")` equals `Money(1000, "USD")`.
- An aggregate is a consistency boundary. Everything inside it is transactionally consistent; everything outside it is eventually consistent. Choose the boundary deliberately.
- Never share a database table across bounded contexts. That is a hidden coupling that no interface can undo.
- Do not build a domain model for a CRUD application. If there are no invariants, a form and a table is the correct architecture.
- The glossary belongs in the repository, and disagreements about it are the most productive meetings you will have.
## Examples
**Primitive obsession versus a domain type:**
```typescript
// Before: every caller must remember the currency and the unit.
function refund(orderId: string, amount: number, currency: string) { ... }
refund("ord_1", 19.99, "USD"); // floating point money, in an unvalidated string id
// After: the types make the mistakes impossible.
class Money {
private constructor(readonly cents: bigint, readonly currency: Currency) {}
static of(cents: bigint, currency: Currency): Money {
if (cents < 0n) throw new DomainError("Money cannot be negative");
return new Money(cents, currency);
}
plus(other: Money): Money {
if (other.currency !== this.currency) {
throw new DomainError(`Cannot add ${other.currency} to ${this.currency}`);
}
return new Money(this.cents + other.cents, this.currency);
}
}
function refund(orderId: OrderId, amount: Money): Refund { ... }
```
Currency mismatches and negative amounts are now compile-time or construction-time errors rather than production incidents.
## Notes
- Aggregate boundaries that are too large create lock contention; boundaries that are too small push consistency into the application layer. Start with the smallest set of objects that must change together atomically.
- Anti-corruption layers exist so that a bad upstream model does not leak into a good one. When integrating a vendor API, translate at the edge — do not let their nouns into your domain.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!