Skip to content
Back to skills

Yuri Adw

ASecurity

Invoke when user asks to run the ADW loop / agentic engineering loop / software factory workflow.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added September 10, 2026
toolsnodecode-reviewgit

Works with

  • claude code
  • terminal

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 10, 2026

npx -y skills add nexuslinkproductions/yuri-os --skill yuri-adw --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Yuri Adw?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Yuri Adw
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nexuslinkproductions-yuri-adw/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nexuslinkproductions-yuri-adw)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: yuri-adw
description: Invoke when user asks to run the ADW loop / agentic engineering loop / software factory workflow.
---

## When to use
- Invoke for end-to-end engineering tickets that need orchestrated planning, deterministic validation, and review.
- Use when output must pass gates, include evidence, and route failures through BUILD payloads.
- Prefer this loop when deterministic artifacts should dominate over agent claims.
- Do not run blindly; pause for owner clarification on missing scope, no acceptance criteria, or blocked dependencies.

## The loop
- `INTAKE -> SCOUT -> PLAN -> BUILD -> VALIDATE -> REVIEW -> SHIP`
- INTAKE: orchestrator decodes + sizes ticket.
- SCOUT: cheap R0 lane (Phoenix, deepseek-v4-flash) produces evidence pack; output is hypothesis.
- PLAN: orchestrator writes the micro-task plan AND, for the gate, an executable decision manifest — `{name, discrete:{dim:[options]}, paramSpace:{param:[lo,hi]}, value:"(config,params)=>number", ...}` (see `adw-gate.mjs --help` for the full schema; the gate scores a decision problem, not prose).
- PLAN GATE: run `node _SYSTEM/Scripts/adw-gate.mjs plan --input <manifest.json>` returning `gate, pass, score, cornerLawBite, predictionId, reasons`. Records a prediction to the ledger.
- BUILD: fan out micro-tasks to producer lanes (gpt-5.4-mini mechanical, gpt-5.3-codex-spark creative, Sonnet semantic; gpt-5.6-luna for rescue/hard delegation — note the provider-route registry classifies luna verifier/strategist, so prefer it for rescue over volume production).
- VALIDATE: deterministic code checks first (lint/type/tests), then ENERGY GATE.
- VALIDATE GATE: run `node _SYSTEM/Scripts/adw-gate.mjs validate --input <outcome.json>` returning `gate, pass, deltaU, contributions, reasons`. Records the outcome to the prediction-ledger ONLY when the input carries the plan's `predictionId`; writes an energy trace only when `YURI_ENERGY_OBSERVABILITY=1` (advisory-unless-armed).
- REVIEW: /codex:review with profile `sol` (`gpt-5.6-sol`) plus native `/code-review`; adjudicate claim-by-claim.
- SHIP: orchestrator only, scoped-pathspec commit, prediction-ledger report, closeout.

## Phase reference table
| Phase | Actor/lane | Command | Gate | Failure route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTAKE | Orchestrator | decode ticket, define constraints, size tasks | none | missing clarity → request owner input |
| SCOUT | R0 lane: Phoenix / deepseek-v4-flash | gather evidence pack | none; all outputs are hypothesis | false/weak claim → ignore or recollect evidence |
| PLAN | Orchestrator | build manifest.json then run plan gate | `adw-gate.mjs plan --input <manifest.json>` | fail -> replan with counter-evidence (max 2 cycles), then HOLD |
| BUILD | Producer lanes: mini, spark, Sonnet (luna = rescue only — registry: verifier-strategist, mayExecuteWorkerTasks false) | execute micro-tasks; no self-verification | none | submit failure payload back to orchestrator for BUILD loop |
| VALIDATE | Orchestrator + deterministic tooling | lint/type/tests, then `adw-gate.mjs validate --input <outcome.json>` | validate gate pass -> deltaU+contributions record | fail -> immediate payload back to BUILD in same session |
| REVIEW | /codex:review (sol) + /code-review + third-family tie-break (Helios/Grok) on disputes | claim-by-claim adjudication | cross-family adversarial pass only | unresolved claim -> return to BUILD or owner |
| SHIP | Orchestrator | scoped `git add`, scoped `git commit`, ledger report | owner-ready, no blocking claims | conflict/uncertain evidence -> HOLD, no commit |

## Roles and lanes
- Keep roles per-task, not fixed per-lane.
- Scout, builder, validator, and verifier are separate responsibilities in each workcell.
- A person/agent may switch roles only with explicit handoff and role boundary log.

## Evidence rules
- Tag every claim as `CONFIRMED` or `PLAUSIBLE`.
- Lane output from SCOUT/BUILD is `PLAUSIBLE` by default and advisory only.
- Deterministic artifacts (`git diff`, tests, type/lint logs, execution logs) are `CONFIRMED`.
- Orchestrator must spot-check at least one claimed path before using SCOUT claims.
- Only `CONFIRMED` claims can pass REVIEW gates and drive SHIP.

## Bounded loops
- Replan only inside PLAN failure.
- Max 2 PLAN replans.
- Third PLAN failure => `HOLD` is a valid terminal state and stops autonomous progression.
- `HOLD` requires owner resolution, then resume as a fresh loop turn.

## Invocation per surface
- Claude Code session: invoke skill `yuri-adw` with the ticket text.
- Codex terminal: invoke skill `yuri-adw` with manifest/ticket context; run worker lanes as needed.
- OMP terminal: invoke skill `yuri-adw` with task + acceptance criteria.
- For all surfaces, pass inputs as plain task text + explicit constraints and expected deliverables.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • examples/README.md764 B
  • examples/plan-manifest.example.json560 B
  • examples/validate-outcome.example.json698 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.