Plan and draft ML/AI introductions as venue-aware argument chains. Use for hook, gap, insight, method, result, contribution flow, and paragraph roles.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NeverSight/skills_feed --skill paper-introduction-argument-writer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Paper Introduction Argument Writer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/neversight-paper-introduction-argument-writer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: paper-introduction-argument-writer
description: Plan and draft ML/AI introductions as venue-aware argument chains. Use for hook, gap, insight, method, result, contribution flow, and paragraph roles.
argument-hint: "[paper-dir] [--venue <venue>] [--archetype <type>] [--mode plan|draft|revise]"
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, WebSearch, WebFetch
---
# Paper Introduction Argument Writer
Write introductions as disciplined arguments. This skill turns a paper's positioning, venue, claims, and evidence into a paragraph-by-paragraph introduction plan or draft.
Use this skill for:
- choosing an introduction argument structure for a target venue and paper archetype
- assigning jobs to intro paragraphs
- drafting or revising hook, problem, gap, insight, method, result, and contribution paragraphs
- strengthening contribution bullets without overclaiming
- deciding what related-work contrast belongs in the introduction
- making intro wording consistent with the abstract, title, evidence board, and writing contract
Do not use this skill for full-paper review. Use `paper-reviewer-simulator` for adversarial critique. Use `paper-writing-assistant` for broad prose drafting. Use `paper-writing-memory-manager` to record introduction paragraph roles, claim dependencies, and stale downstream locations. Use `related-work-positioning-writer` for the full related-work section. Use `paper-writing-contract-planner` first when the paper archetype or claim contract is not settled.
## Skill Directory Layout
```text
<installed-skill-dir>/
├── SKILL.md
├── references/
│ ├── argument-patterns.md
│ └── paragraph-moves.md
└── templates/
└── introduction-plan.md
```
## Progressive Loading
- Always read `references/argument-patterns.md`.
- Read `references/paragraph-moves.md` when drafting, revising, or diagnosing paragraph-level flow.
- Use `templates/introduction-plan.md` when creating `paper/.agent/introduction-plan.md`.
- Read local `paper/.agent/writing-contract.md`, `paper/.agent/writing-memory/`, `paper/.agent/paper-evidence-board.md`, `paper/.agent/related-work-plan.md`, and `paper/.agent/provisional-results.md` when present.
- Read current draft files such as `main.tex`, `paper.tex`, `sections/introduction.tex`, `sections/intro.tex`, `sections/abstract.tex`, and `sections/related_work.tex` when revising an existing paper.
## Core Principles
- The introduction is a sales argument, not a literature survey.
- Each paragraph needs one reader-facing job and one handoff sentence.
- The gap must be specific enough to justify this paper, not the whole field.
- The insight must explain why the proposed approach is plausible before details appear.
- Result claims in the introduction must match evidence status.
- Contribution bullets should name deliverables and evidence, not repeat marketing slogans.
- Related-work contrast in the introduction should include only the closest boundary needed to understand novelty.
- If the evidence is missing or provisional, narrow the claim or mark the placeholder explicitly.
## Step 1 - Build an Intro Snapshot
Extract:
```markdown
## Introduction Snapshot
- Target venue:
- Paper archetype:
- Intended audience:
- Primary claim:
- Secondary claims:
- Core problem:
- Closest prior limitation:
- Key insight:
- Proposed object:
- Main evidence:
- Missing/provisional evidence:
- Related-work boundary needed in intro:
- Forbidden claims:
```
Prefer existing project artifacts over memory. If no claim IDs exist, assign local `CLM-TMP-*` IDs and suggest syncing them to `paper-evidence-board`.
## Step 2 - Select Argument Pattern
Read `references/argument-patterns.md` and choose one pattern:
- method breakthrough
- benchmark/dataset
- empirical study
- analysis/diagnostic
- systems/tooling
- application
- negative result or limitation
- hybrid
If the paper has multiple plausible archetypes, choose the one that matches the paper's main sell and mark the secondary archetype as a constraint.
## Step 3 - Plan Paragraph Jobs
Create or update:
```text
paper/.agent/introduction-plan.md
```
If there is no `paper/` directory and the current directory is the paper repo, save to:
```text
.agent/introduction-plan.md
```
Use `templates/introduction-plan.md`. Every paragraph should specify:
- paragraph job
- first-sentence role
- evidence or citation used
- claim supported
- handoff to next paragraph
- overclaim risk
## Step 4 - Draft or Revise the Introduction
When drafting, write paragraph-by-paragraph prose that follows the plan. When revising, preserve correct citations, labels, macros, math, and verified numbers.
For each paragraph:
- open with the reader question for that paragraph
- move from known context to paper-specific gap
- use one main contrast, not several unrelated contrasts
- end by pushing the reader to the next paragraph
- avoid final-sounding claims when evidence is provisional
## Step 5 - Contribution Paragraph
Contribution bullets should answer:
- What did we build, prove, evaluate, release, or discover?
- What is the claim strength?
- Which evidence supports it?
- What should the reader remember?
Avoid contribution bullets that only restate section titles.
## Step 6 - Final Checks
Before finalizing:
- intro claim strength matches the evidence board and writing contract
- the gap is neither too broad nor too narrow
- the insight appears before method detail
- related-work contrast is enough but not a full survey
- contribution bullets are concrete and evidence-backed
- all provisional result language is searchable and tracked
- abstract/title alignment issues are routed to `abstract-title-contribution-writer` when needed
- introduction claim, paragraph-role, or handoff changes are written back through `paper-writing-memory-manager`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!