Expert negotiation coaching combining Harvard, Kellogg, Wharton, HBS, and FBI methodologies. Use when: (1) preparing for any negotiation (salary, contracts, deals, disputes), (2) during a negotiation for real-time tactics, (3) analyzing failed negotiations, (4) coaching someone through difficult conversations, (5) resolving conflicts. Covers: BATNA analysis, MESOs, tactical empathy, anchoring, reframing, and more.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NeverSight/skills_feed --skill negotiation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Negotiation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/neversight-negotiation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: negotiation
description: >
Expert negotiation coaching combining Harvard, Kellogg, Wharton, HBS, and FBI methodologies.
Use when: (1) preparing for any negotiation (salary, contracts, deals, disputes),
(2) during a negotiation for real-time tactics, (3) analyzing failed negotiations,
(4) coaching someone through difficult conversations, (5) resolving conflicts.
Covers: BATNA analysis, MESOs, tactical empathy, anchoring, reframing, and more.
user-invocable: true
---
# Negotiation
World-class negotiation coaching synthesizing methodologies from Harvard, Kellogg, Wharton, HBS, and FBI experts.
## Mode Selection
Ask: **"Are you preparing for a negotiation, or are you in one right now?"**
- **Coaching Mode**: Real-time guidance during active negotiations
- **Reference Mode**: Pre-negotiation preparation and framework review
## Quick Start: Universal 5-Step Framework
Use this for any negotiation without loading additional references:
### Step 1: Prepare Your BATNA
- What's your best alternative if this negotiation fails?
- What's THEIR best alternative?
- The stronger your BATNA, the more power you have
### Step 2: Identify Interests (Not Positions)
- Position: "I want $150K salary"
- Interest: "I need financial security and recognition of my value"
- Ask "Why?" and "Why not?" to uncover interests
### Step 3: Expand the Pie
- Add issues beyond the obvious (timing, scope, terms, flexibility)
- Trade items you value less for items you value more
- Use MESOs: Present 3 equivalent offers to learn their priorities
### Step 4: Anchor Strategically
- If you know the ZOPA better than they do, make the first offer
- Anchor at the edge of the range that favors you
- Use precise numbers ($147,500 not $150,000) for stronger anchors
### Step 5: Build Agreement
- Label emotions: "It sounds like you're concerned about..."
- Use calibrated questions: "How would you like me to proceed?"
- Build a golden bridge: Make it easy for them to say yes
## Situation-Based Methodology Selection
| Situation | Load These References |
|-----------|----------------------|
| Salary/compensation | `kellogg-medvec.md`, `bargaining-advantage.md` |
| Business deals/M&A | `harvard-principled.md`, `kellogg-medvec.md` |
| Difficult counterpart | `fbi-tactical.md`, `harvard-principled.md` |
| Sales/closing deals | `camp-system.md`, `wharton-emotional.md` |
| Conflict resolution | `wharton-emotional.md`, `harvard-principled.md` |
| Power imbalance (you're weaker) | `negotiation-genius.md`, `camp-system.md` |
| Multi-party/complex | `harvard-principled.md`, `kellogg-medvec.md` |
| Cross-cultural | `wharton-emotional.md`, `bargaining-advantage.md` |
| Universal concepts | `core-concepts.md` |
## Coaching Mode Workflow
1. **Assess the situation**
- What type of negotiation is this?
- Who is the counterpart? What do you know about them?
- What's at stake?
2. **Develop your position**
- What's your target outcome?
- What's your BATNA?
- What's their likely BATNA?
- What interests (yours and theirs) are at play?
3. **Load relevant methodology** based on situation type above
4. **Prepare tactical approach**
- Opening strategy (anchor or respond?)
- Key phrases and calibrated questions
- Concession strategy
5. **During negotiation**: Provide real-time suggestions
- Specific language to use
- Tactics to employ
- Warning signs to watch for
6. **Post-negotiation debrief**
- What worked?
- What could improve?
- Lessons for next time
## Reference Files
| File | Methodology | Key Techniques |
|------|-------------|----------------|
| `harvard-principled.md` | Fisher/Ury | 4 principles, BATNA, Getting Past No |
| `kellogg-medvec.md` | Victoria Medvec | MESOs, Issue Matrix, fear removal |
| `fbi-tactical.md` | Chris Voss | Tactical empathy, mirroring, labeling |
| `wharton-emotional.md` | Stuart Diamond | 12 strategies, emotional payments |
| `negotiation-genius.md` | Deepak Malhotra | Deadlock breaking, weakness negotiation |
| `bargaining-advantage.md` | G. Richard Shell | 6 foundations, 4-step process |
| `camp-system.md` | Jim Camp | "No" philosophy, eliminating neediness |
| `core-concepts.md` | Universal | BATNA, ZOPA, anchoring, framing |
## Key Phrases to Use
### Opening
- "Help me understand your perspective on this."
- "What would make this work for you?"
- "I'd like to explore some options together."
### Exploring Interests
- "What's most important to you in this deal?"
- "If we could solve [X], would that change things?"
- "What concerns do you have about this approach?"
### Labeling Emotions (Voss)
- "It seems like you're frustrated with..."
- "It sounds like this is important because..."
- "It looks like there's been some history here..."
### Calibrated Questions (Voss)
- "How am I supposed to do that?"
- "What would you like me to do?"
- "How can we solve this problem?"
### Reframing (Ury)
- "So what you're really saying is..."
- "Let me make sure I understand your concerns..."
- "If I hear you correctly, your main interest is..."
### Building Agreement
- "What would it take to make this work?"
- "Is there any way we could..."
- "I want to find a solution that works for both of us."
## Warning Signs
Watch for these and adjust tactics:
- **Hardball tactics**: Threats, ultimatums, take-it-or-leave-it
- Response: Label it, don't react emotionally, ask calibrated questions
- **Deception signals**: Inconsistencies, vague answers, avoiding specifics
- Response: Ask probing questions, verify independently
- **Impasse**: Neither side budging
- Response: Reframe the problem, add issues, take a break
- **Emotional escalation**: Raised voices, personal attacks
- Response: Go to the balcony, label emotions, slow down
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!