Turn owner feedback about agent behavior into concrete system changes. Use when the owner says something is off, wants the assistant to improve how it operates, asks for a reflection, or wants a durable fix instead of a one-off apology.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add netanel-abergel/pa-skills --skill self-reflection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Self Reflection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/netanel-abergel-self-reflection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: self-reflection
description: |-
Turn owner feedback about agent behavior into concrete system changes. Use when the owner says
something is off, wants the assistant to improve how it operates, asks for a reflection, or wants
a durable fix instead of a one-off apology.
---
# Self-Reflection
Use this when the owner wants a real operating change, not just a nicer reply.
## Goal
Convert vague dissatisfaction into technical updates to prompts, memory, skills, config, tooling, or routines.
## 1. Understand the Problem
Ask at most 2-3 focused questions, only if needed:
- What specifically went wrong?
- What should have happened instead?
- Is this a local tweak or a deeper operating issue?
If the failure is already clear from context, skip the questions and move to diagnosis.
## 2. Deep System Scan
Read broadly before changing anything.
### Core behavior
Check the relevant parts of:
- `SOUL.md`
- `IDENTITY.md`
- `USER.md`
- `MEMORY.md`
- relevant daily notes
- tool or channel instructions that affect the behavior
### Skills
Check:
- the directly related workspace skills
- any bundled skill that overlaps
- collisions where a workspace skill overrides a bundled one
### Runtime / config
Check anything relevant to the issue:
- model or routing settings
- channel behavior
- queue / heartbeat behavior
- crons
- helper scripts or hooks
## 3. Diagnose
Present a short diagnosis before editing behavior-critical files:
1. **Root cause** — what produced the bad behavior
2. **Proposed changes** — exact files to change
3. **Side effects** — what else those changes might affect
4. **Alternatives** — only if there are real tradeoffs
Do not offer fake fixes like "I'll be more careful" unless that is backed by a concrete system change.
## 4. Implement After Approval
Once approved, make the changes concretely:
- edit prompts or memory files
- create or update skills
- adjust scripts, hooks, or config
- add/remove cron behavior if timing is the issue
Prefer the smallest durable fix that prevents repeat failures.
## 5. Verify
- Re-read the changed files for consistency.
- Run a small proof when possible: test, grep, diff, or reproduction check.
- Document what changed and why.
- Commit the changes.
## Principles
- Scan everything relevant, then change only what matters.
- Behavioral fixes need technical artifacts.
- Owner approval is required before changing core behavior rules.
- If a limitation is model-level, say that plainly.
- The output of reflection is a durable improvement, not a performance of regret.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!