Draft, rewrite, or audit inclusive US digital-government content using an independently expressed interpretation of the 18F Content Guide. Use for public-service websites, forms, applications, transactional messages, help content, notices, and government digital experiences that should help people complete a task with minimal bureaucratic burden.
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Neeeophytee/agent-stylebooks --skill 18f-content --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of 18f Content?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/neeeophytee-18f-content)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: 18f-content
description: Draft, rewrite, or audit inclusive US digital-government content using an independently expressed interpretation of the 18F Content Guide. Use for public-service websites, forms, applications, transactional messages, help content, notices, and government digital experiences that should help people complete a task with minimal bureaucratic burden.
---
# 18F content
Design content as part of the service. Reduce the effort and uncertainty a person
faces when interacting with government.
## Preserve policy and rights
- Keep eligibility rules, legal obligations, deadlines, amounts, records, and appeal
rights exact.
- Do not turn an agency preference into a legal requirement.
- Separate the common path, exceptions, and discretionary decisions.
- Flag any wording change that may require policy or legal review.
## Map the service task
1. Identify what the person is trying to accomplish and what may be at stake.
2. List the decisions, information, documents, and waiting periods in their order.
3. Find avoidable burdens: repeated data, internal jargon, hidden deadlines, unclear
status, or a dead end after failure.
4. Put the content where the person needs it in the flow rather than collecting all
help on a separate page.
5. Provide an alternative route when the primary channel or assumption may exclude people.
## Write plain, inclusive content
- Lead with the person's goal, status, or next action.
- Use common words, active voice, and concrete verbs.
- Address the person as `you`. Name the agency or system when it acts.
- Explain necessary legal or technical terms next to the plain-language meaning.
- Use respectful language that does not assume gender, family structure, ability,
citizenship, income, device, bandwidth, or familiarity with government.
- Ask only for information needed at that point and explain why sensitive data is needed.
- Make help and error messages describe recovery, not merely failure.
## Write forms and transactions
- Give fields visible labels that name the requested information.
- Use hint text for format, scope, or reason, not to repeat the label.
- Put validation near the field and say how to fix the value.
- Confirm what was submitted, what happens next, how long it may take, and how to
correct or follow up on the submission.
- Do not use color, position, or visual wording as the only cue.
## Avoid
- agency-first introductions and internal process explanations
- bureaucratic substitutions for ordinary, accurate words
- shame, blame, threats, or false reassurance
- hidden costs, deadlines, consequences, and alternative service channels
- `easy`, `simple`, `obvious`, and assumptions about digital skill
- unnecessary questions, repeated data entry, and instructions that exist only to
accommodate an internal org chart
- unexplained acronyms and legal citations as the primary explanation
## Final pass
Check that a person can understand their status, act, recover from an error, and
find help without knowing the agency's structure. Confirm accessibility cues,
privacy explanations, time expectations, and alternatives.
Read [references/provenance.md](references/provenance.md) only for source,
attribution, licensing, or maintenance questions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!