Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Frontend Testing

ASecurity

Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities. Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests.

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/25/2026
ai-agentstypescriptpythongobashreacttestingapifrontendbackend

Works with

cliapi

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 10 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 9/25/2026

$npx -y skills add Najeebullah3124/awesome-claude-universe --skill frontend-testing --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Frontend Testing?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Frontend Testing
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/najeebullah3124-frontend-testing/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/najeebullah3124-frontend-testing)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: frontend-testing
description: Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities. Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests.
---

# Dify Frontend Testing Skill

This skill enables Claude to generate high-quality, comprehensive frontend tests for the Dify project following established conventions and best practices.

> **⚠️ Authoritative Source**: This skill is derived from `web/docs/test.md`. Use Vitest mock/timer APIs (`vi.*`).

## When to Apply This Skill

Apply this skill when the user:

- Asks to **write tests** for a component, hook, or utility
- Asks to **review existing tests** for completeness
- Mentions **Vitest**, **React Testing Library**, **RTL**, or **spec files**
- Requests **test coverage** improvement
- Uses `pnpm analyze-component` output as context
- Mentions **testing**, **unit tests**, or **integration tests** for frontend code
- Wants to understand **testing patterns** in the Dify codebase

**Do NOT apply** when:

- User is asking about backend/API tests (Python/pytest)
- User is asking about E2E tests (Playwright/Cypress)
- User is only asking conceptual questions without code context

## Quick Reference

### Tech Stack

| Tool | Version | Purpose |
|------|---------|---------|
| Vitest | 4.0.16 | Test runner |
| React Testing Library | 16.0 | Component testing |
| jsdom | - | Test environment |
| nock | 14.0 | HTTP mocking |
| TypeScript | 5.x | Type safety |

### Key Commands

```bash
# Run all tests
pnpm test

# Watch mode
pnpm test:watch

# Run specific file
pnpm test path/to/file.spec.tsx

# Generate coverage report
pnpm test:coverage

# Analyze component complexity
pnpm analyze-component <path>

# Review existing test
pnpm analyze-component <path> --review
```

### File Naming

- Test files: `ComponentName.spec.tsx` inside a same-level `__tests__/` directory
- Placement rule: Component, hook, and utility tests must live in a sibling `__tests__/` folder at the same level as the source under test. For example, `foo/index.tsx` maps to `foo/__tests__/index.spec.tsx`, and `foo/bar.ts` maps to `foo/__tests__/bar.spec.ts`.
- Integration tests: `web/__tests__/` directory

## Test Structure Template

```typescript
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import Component from './index'

// ✅ Import real project components (DO NOT mock these)
// import Loading from '@/app/components/base/loading'
// import { ChildComponent } from './child-component'

// ✅ Mock external dependencies only
vi.mock('@/service/api')
vi.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
  useRouter: () => ({ push: vi.fn() }),
  usePathname: () => '/test',
}))

// ✅ Zustand stores: Use real stores (auto-mocked globally)
// Set test state with: useAppStore.setState({ ... })

// Shared state for mocks (if needed)
let mockSharedState = false

describe('ComponentName', () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    vi.clearAllMocks()  // ✅ Reset mocks BEFORE each test
    mockSharedState = false  // ✅ Reset shared state
  })

  // Rendering tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Rendering', () => {
    it('should render without crashing', () => {
      // Arrange
      const props = { title: 'Test' }
      
      // Act
      render(<Component {...props} />)
      
      // Assert
      expect(screen.getByText('Test')).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })

  // Props tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Props', () => {
    it('should apply custom className', () => {
      render(<Component className="custom" />)
      expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('custom')
    })
  })

  // User Interactions
  describe('User Interactions', () => {
    it('should handle click events', () => {
      const handleClick = vi.fn()
      render(<Component onClick={handleClick} />)
      
      fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
      
      expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
    })
  })

  // Edge Cases (REQUIRED)
  describe('Edge Cases', () => {
    it('should handle null data', () => {
      render(<Component data={null} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })

    it('should handle empty array', () => {
      render(<Component items={[]} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/empty/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })
})
```

## Testing Workflow (CRITICAL)

### ⚠️ Incremental Approach Required

**NEVER generate all test files at once.** For complex components or multi-file directories:

1. **Analyze & Plan**: List all files, order by complexity (simple → complex)
1. **Process ONE at a time**: Write test → Run test → Fix if needed → Next
1. **Verify before proceeding**: Do NOT continue to next file until current passes

```
For each file:
  ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ 1. Write test                          │
  │ 2. Run: pnpm test <file>.spec.tsx      │
  │ 3. PASS? → Mark complete, next file    │
  │    FAIL? → Fix first, then continue    │
  └────────────────────────────────────────┘
```

### Complexity-Based Order

Process in this order for multi-file testing:

1. 🟢 Utility functions (simplest)
1. 🟢 Custom hooks
1. 🟡 Simple components (presentational)
1. 🟡 Medium components (state, effects)
1. 🔴 Complex components (API, routing)
1. 🔴 Integration tests (index files - last)

### When to Refactor First

- **Complexity > 50**: Break into smaller pieces before testing
- **500+ lines**: Consider splitting before testing
- **Many dependencies**: Extract logic into hooks first

> 📖 See `references/workflow.md` for complete workflow details and todo list format.

## Testing Strategy

### Path-Level Testing (Directory Testing)

When assigned to test a directory/path, test **ALL content** within that path:

- Test all components, hooks, utilities in the directory (not just `index` file)
- Use incremental approach: one file at a time, verify each before proceeding
- Goal: 100% coverage of ALL files in the directory

### Integration Testing First

**Prefer integration testing** when writing tests for a directory:

- ✅ **Import real project components** directly (including base components and siblings)
- ✅ **Only mock**: API services (`@/service/*`), `next/navigation`, complex context providers
- ❌ **DO NOT mock** base components (`@/app/components/base/*`) or dify-ui primitives (`@langgenius/dify-ui/*`)
- ❌ **DO NOT mock** sibling/child components in the same directory

> See [Test Structure Template](#test-structure-template) for correct import/mock patterns.

### `nuqs` Query State Testing (Required for URL State Hooks)

When a component or hook uses `useQueryState` / `useQueryStates`:

- ✅ Use `NuqsTestingAdapter` (prefer shared helpers in `web/test/nuqs-testing.tsx`)
- ✅ Assert URL synchronization via `onUrlUpdate` (`searchParams`, `options.history`)
- ✅ For custom parsers (`createParser`), keep `parse` and `serialize` bijective and add round-trip edge cases (`%2F`, `%25`, spaces, legacy encoded values)
- ✅ Verify default-clearing behavior (default values should be removed from URL when applicable)
- ⚠️ Only mock `nuqs` directly when URL behavior is explicitly out of scope for the test

## Core Principles

### 1. AAA Pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)

Every test should clearly separate:

- **Arrange**: Setup test data and render component
- **Act**: Perform user actions
- **Assert**: Verify expected outcomes

### 2. Black-Box Testing

- Test observable behavior, not implementation details
- Use semantic queries (getByRole, getByLabelText)
- Avoid testing internal state directly
- **Prefer pattern matching over hardcoded strings** in assertions:

```typescript
// ❌ Avoid: hardcoded text assertions
expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()

// ✅ Better: role-based queries
expect(screen.getByRole('status')).toBeInTheDocument()

// ✅ Better: pattern matching
expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
```

### 3. Single Behavior Per Test

Each test verifies ONE user-observable behavior:

```typescript
// ✅ Good: One behavior
it('should disable button when loading', () => {
  render(<Button loading />)
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})

// ❌ Bad: Multiple behaviors
it('should handle loading state', () => {
  render(<Button loading />)
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
  expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('loading')
})
```

### 4. Semantic Naming

Use `should <behavior> when <condition>`:

```typescript
it('should show error message when validation fails')
it('should call onSubmit when form is valid')
it('should disable input when isReadOnly is true')
```

## Required Test Scenarios

### Always Required (All Components)

1. **Rendering**: Component renders without crashing
1. **Props**: Required props, optional props, default values
1. **Edge Cases**: null, undefined, empty values, boundary conditions

### Conditional (When Present)

| Feature | Test Focus |
|---------|-----------|
| `useState` | Initial state, transitions, cleanup |
| `useEffect` | Execution, dependencies, cleanup |
| Event handlers | All onClick, onChange, onSubmit, keyboard |
| API calls | Loading, success, error states |
| Routing | Navigation, params, query strings |
| `useCallback`/`useMemo` | Referential equality |
| Context | Provider values, consumer behavior |
| Forms | Validation, submission, error display |

## Coverage Goals (Per File)

For each test file generated, aim for:

- ✅ **100%** function coverage
- ✅ **100%** statement coverage
- ✅ **>95%** branch coverage
- ✅ **>95%** line coverage

> **Note**: For multi-file directories, process one file at a time with full coverage each. See `references/workflow.md`.

## Detailed Guides

For more detailed information, refer to:

- `references/workflow.md` - **Incremental testing workflow** (MUST READ for multi-file testing)
- `references/mocking.md` - Mock patterns, Zustand store testing, and best practices
- `references/async-testing.md` - Async operations and API calls
- `references/domain-components.md` - Workflow, Dataset, Configuration testing
- `references/common-patterns.md` - Frequently used testing patterns
- `references/checklist.md` - Test generation checklist and validation steps

## Authoritative References

### Primary Specification (MUST follow)

- **`web/docs/test.md`** - The canonical testing specification. This skill is derived from this document.

### Reference Examples in Codebase

- `web/utils/classnames.spec.ts` - Utility function tests
- `web/app/components/base/radio/__tests__/index.spec.tsx` - Component tests
- `web/__mocks__/provider-context.ts` - Mock factory example

### Project Configuration

- `web/vite.config.ts` - Vite/Vitest configuration
- `web/vitest.setup.ts` - Test environment setup
- `web/scripts/analyze-component.js` - Component analysis tool
- Modules are not mocked automatically. Global mocks live in `web/vitest.setup.ts` (for example `react-i18next`, `next/image`); mock other modules like `ky` or `mime` locally in test files.

Attribution

Najeebullah3124Najeebullah3124
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from Najeebullah3124 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698621 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →