Review a change set (working diff, branch, or PR) for impact, correctness signals, and architecture fit using indexed evidence: changed files, reference and call-path verification, diagnostics, and boundary/dead-code checks. Use when a review names multiple files or asks "what does this change affect". Not for style-only nits on a single file.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Workflow Skills?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mupozg823-workflow-skills-codelens-mcp-plugin)
---
id: review
title: Repository Review
risk: analyze
implicit: true
description: >
Review a change set (working diff, branch, or PR) for impact, correctness
signals, and architecture fit using indexed evidence: changed files, reference
and call-path verification, diagnostics, and boundary/dead-code checks. Use
when a review names multiple files or asks "what does this change affect".
Not for style-only nits on a single file.
tools:
- prepare_harness_session
- get_changed_files
- review
- diagnose
- graph
- find_referencing_symbols
---
# CodeLens Review
1. **Bind + scope.** `prepare_harness_session`, then `get_changed_files` to fix the
review scope; pin the snapshot so later calls are deterministic.
2. **Impact pass.** `graph` (impact/diff-refs) on the changed set — enumerate
affected callers before reading bodies; verify externally visible symbols with
`find_referencing_symbols`.
3. **Quality pass.** `review` (changes; architecture/boundary/dead/dupes modes as
relevant) and `diagnose` (file/unresolved) on touched files only.
4. **Verdict format.** Findings ranked by severity, each with file:line, the
failing scenario, and the evidence call that produced it. State what was NOT
checked (untouched modes) — no silent coverage claims.
