Skip to content
Back to skills

Pricing Packaging

ASecurity

Design or evaluate pricing and packaging strategy. Use when setting prices for a new tier, adjusting existing pricing, or restructuring packages.

  • 10 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
businessrustgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add mrthames/lean-pm-skills --skill pricing-packaging --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pricing Packaging?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pricing Packaging
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mrthames-pricing-packaging/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mrthames-pricing-packaging)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pricing-packaging
description: Design or evaluate pricing and packaging strategy. Use when setting prices for a new tier, adjusting existing pricing, or restructuring packages.
---

# Pricing & Packaging

Structure a pricing and packaging analysis in 1-2 days instead of a multi-week pricing project. Claude handles competitive research, tier modeling, and revenue scenario analysis. You handle the strategic positioning, customer conversations, and willingness-to-pay judgment.

## When to Use

- Launching a new product or tier and need to set initial pricing
- Evaluating whether current pricing is leaving money on the table
- Restructuring packages (bundling, unbundling, good-better-best tiering)
- Competitors changed pricing and you need to respond (or not)
- Moving from freemium to paid, or introducing a free tier

## When NOT to Use

- Running a pricing A/B test — use an Experiment Brief template
- Analyzing revenue metrics — use Growth & Retention Diagnostics
- Building an investment case for a pricing change — use Stakeholder Alignment + this skill's output

## The AI-Native Approach

| Step | Time | Claude Does | You Do |
|---|---|---|---|
| Define value metrics | 1-2 hrs | Analyze product usage to identify what users value most | Validate against your customer knowledge |
| Competitive landscape | 2-3 hrs | Survey competitor pricing, features, and positioning | Add context on competitors' strategies |
| Design tiers | 2-3 hrs | Model good-better-best tier structures with feature allocation | Decide strategic positioning per tier |
| Revenue modeling | 1-2 hrs | Run scenario analysis across price points | Validate assumptions, choose target |
| Design the test | 1 hr | Draft experiment brief for pricing change | Define risk tolerance and rollout plan |

## Process

### Step 1: Define Value Metrics (1-2 hours)

A value metric is the unit your customers pay for — the thing that scales with the value they receive.

```
Here's our product context:
- [What the product does]
- [Current pricing model if it exists]
- [Key usage data — what features are used most, by whom, and how much]
- [Customer segments and their primary use cases]

Help me identify the right value metric(s):
- What do users do more of as they get more value?
- Which usage patterns correlate with retention and expansion?
- What metric is easy for customers to understand and predict?
- What metric aligns our revenue growth with customer success?

Evaluate: seats, usage volume, features, outcomes, or hybrid models.
For each option, flag the pros, cons, and which customer segments it favors.
```

### Step 2: Competitive Pricing Landscape (2-3 hours)

```
Analyze the pricing landscape for [our category/competitors]:

For each competitor [list 3-5]:
- Pricing model (per seat, usage-based, flat rate, hybrid)
- Published price points and tier structure
- What's included at each tier
- Free tier or trial availability
- Enterprise/custom pricing signals

Then assess:
- Where is the market converging on pricing model?
- Are there underserved segments (priced out or overpaying)?
- What pricing moves would be expected vs. surprising?
- Where is there room to differentiate on packaging, not just price?
```

### Step 3: Design Tier Structure (2-3 hours)

```
Based on our value metric analysis and competitive landscape, design a
good-better-best tier structure:

For each tier:
- Name and positioning (who is this for?)
- Features included (map to value realization stages)
- Price point range with rationale
- What makes someone upgrade to the next tier?
- What's explicitly excluded and why?

Constraints:
- [Your constraints — e.g., "free tier must exist", "enterprise requires SSO",
  "can't exceed $X for SMB segment"]

Design principles:
- Each tier must deliver complete value for its segment (not crippled versions)
- The upgrade trigger should be natural (usage growth, team growth, feature need)
- Packaging should be easy to explain in one sentence per tier
```

### Step 4: Revenue Modeling (1-2 hours)

```
Model revenue scenarios for the proposed tier structure:

Inputs:
- Current customer distribution: [segments, sizes, current spend]
- Assumed conversion rates between tiers: [estimates]
- Growth assumptions: [new customer acquisition rate, expansion rate]

Model three scenarios:
1. Conservative: [lower conversion, higher churn from price change]
2. Expected: [your best estimates]
3. Optimistic: [higher conversion, lower churn]

For each: project MRR impact at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Flag: which customer segments gain value, which might churn, and the net effect.
```

### Step 5: Design the Pricing Test (1 hour)

```
Draft an experiment brief for rolling out this pricing change:

- Who sees new pricing first (new customers only? specific segment? geography?)
- What's the control vs. variant?
- Success metrics: conversion rate, ARPU, revenue per visitor, churn rate
- Guardrail metrics: support ticket volume, cancellation rate, NPS
- Duration: minimum runtime for statistical significance
- Rollback criteria: what triggers reverting to current pricing
- Communication plan: how do we announce this to existing customers?
```

## Output

- Value metric analysis with recommendation
- Competitive pricing matrix
- Tier structure with feature allocation, price points, and upgrade triggers
- Revenue scenario models (conservative, expected, optimistic)
- Pricing experiment brief with rollout plan

## Common Pitfalls

1. **Cost-plus pricing.** Never set prices based on what it costs you to deliver. Price based on the value customers receive. Cost determines margin, not price.
2. **Competitor-matching.** Matching competitor prices positions you as equivalent. Price to reflect your unique value — higher if you're differentiated, lower only if you're competing on volume.
3. **Too many tiers.** Three tiers (good-better-best) is the sweet spot for most products. More than four creates decision paralysis.
4. **Crippling the free or low tier.** If your free tier is frustrating, it generates negative word-of-mouth. If it's too generous, no one upgrades. The free tier should deliver real value for a specific use case with natural upgrade triggers.
5. **Changing pricing without a communication plan.** Existing customers who discover price changes without context will churn. Always grandfather or communicate.

## Related Skills

- [Growth & Retention Diagnostics](../growth-retention-diagnostics/SKILL.md) — when pricing changes affect retention
- [Stakeholder Alignment](../stakeholder-alignment/SKILL.md) — when pricing decisions need executive buy-in
- Reference: [FRAMEWORKS.md](../../FRAMEWORKS.md) — SaaS Metrics (MRR, ARPU, LTV, CAC)
- Reference: [TEMPLATES.md](../../TEMPLATES.md) — Experiment Brief template

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.