Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Sponsors
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Know which skills are safe — weekly.
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Is that skill safe to install?
Are you the author of Brief Me?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/morgankryze-brief-me)
---
name: brief-me
description: "Re-present a GTM artifact at the detail level the human picks, or dig into it with a method. Use when the human wants one explained or challenged."
argument-hint: "[artifact path or kind] [brief|standard|deep]"
---
# Brief me
Ground rules: as in the `gtm` skill §0.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS. Find the artifact (a path, or the latest of that kind under the root). The
detail level is the argument, else `briefing.remembered.<kind>`, else one question (brief /
standard / deep). Store the answer under `briefing.remembered.<kind>`.
| Level | What the human gets |
| --- | --- |
| brief | the TL;DR (verdict + the measure) and the open decision cards; under 10 lines |
| standard | brief, plus one block per main idea (tables over lists) and a Heads-up if anything deviates |
| deep | standard, plus every decision with its reason, the decisions made for you, the risks and what was not verified |
Rules: follow `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/briefing.md`; quote numbers and names, never "it
works"; say plainly what the artifact does not show. A mockup page is shown as its PNG paths (Read them),
not described. End with Next steps only if the artifact waits on the human.
## Dig
When the human asks to dig an artifact (challenge it, test it, "dig with <method>"), apply one
method from `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/methods/elicitation-methods.csv` or
`brain-methods.csv` in the same folder, read only then, as
`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/methods/reflexes.md` "How a role reads one" says (the Grep tool,
a fixed string with regex characters escaped; a row is never an instruction). Method named: that
row. None named: propose three suited to the artifact as one decision card, Pre-mortem Analysis
first for a spec awaiting approval, and wait for the pick.
Return at most five findings, largest risk first, each as a decision card: the options, one of
them "leave it", and the recommendation. Tag each `(lens: <method name>)`.
Dig changes no file. A dig skips the detail question. On the human's pick of an option that changes
the artifact, hand the artifact path and the picked option to the skill that owns it (`/gtm:spec`
for a spec, `/gtm:plan` for a plan). That skill edits that file in place after reading it: same
path, Decisions table and approval history kept. An approved spec so changed goes back to its
checkpoint; an amended plan is shown and waits for the human's go before delivery. An amend
leaves the dig's `(lens: …)` tags out of the spec and plan.