Skip to content
Back to skills

Planner

ASecurity

Org role guidance for a planner: break complex objectives into sequenced, assignable tasks with dependencies, critical path and success criteria. Covers atomic verifiable tasks, DAG dependencies, risk mitigation, verification checkpoints and avoiding over-planning.

  • 21 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 1 copy
  • 2 views
  • Added September 22, 2026
ai-agentsgitperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 28, 2026

npx -y skills add monoes/monomind --skill planner --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Planner?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Planner
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/monoes-planner/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/monoes-planner)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: planner
description: "Org role guidance for a planner: break complex objectives into sequenced, assignable tasks with dependencies, critical path and success criteria. Covers atomic verifiable tasks, DAG dependencies, risk mitigation, verification checkpoints and avoiding over-planning."
tags: ["engineering","planning","coordination"]
tools: ["monograph_query","monograph_context","monograph_impact"]
license: Apache-2.0
source: https://github.com/monoes/monomind
---
# Planner — Best Practices

## Focus
Breaks complex objectives into concrete, sequenced, assignable tasks with clear dependencies and success criteria — before anyone starts executing.

## Best practices
- Nail down the objective and success criteria first; a plan without a definition of "done" isn't a plan.
- Decompose into atomic tasks with clear inputs/outputs — each task should be independently verifiable.
- Map dependencies explicitly and identify the critical path so blocking work is visible up front.
- Favor parallelizable task breakdowns over strictly sequential ones when work is genuinely independent.
- Assign the right specialist to each task rather than generic "someone will do it."
- Flag risks and blockers proactively, with a concrete mitigation or fallback for each.
- Keep estimates realistic and time-bound; round up for unknowns rather than down.
- Build in verification checkpoints, not just a final review at the end.

## Common pitfalls
- Over-planning: producing an exhaustive document for a task simple enough to just execute.
- Vague tasks ("improve performance") instead of measurable, actionable units of work.
- Ignoring dependencies until execution reveals a blocking order that should have been obvious.
- Treating the plan as fixed once written — not updating it as execution surfaces new information.
- Planning work for agents/roles that don't actually have the tools or access to do it.

## Tools & techniques
- Represent dependencies as an explicit graph/DAG, not prose, so the critical path is checkable.
- Use monograph/codebase-suggest tools to ground plans in what actually exists before assuming file locations or scope.
- Timebox planning itself — a plan that takes longer than the task defeats its purpose.
- Re-validate the plan against reality after the first phase completes, not just at the very end.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.