Write a single clear, honest public statement about an incident. Use when asked to draft a public statement, a press statement, or an official response to a security breach, outage, data incident, recall, or public controversy. Produces a ready-to-publish statement — acknowledgement, what happened, impact, what you're doing, what affected people should do, and a commitment to update — plus a short and a long version.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill incident-public-statement --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Incident Public Statement?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mohitagw15856-incident-public-statement-pm-claude-skills)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: incident-public-statement
description: "Write a single clear, honest public statement about an incident. Use when asked to draft a public statement, a press statement, or an official response to a security breach, outage, data incident, recall, or public controversy. Produces a ready-to-publish statement — acknowledgement, what happened, impact, what you're doing, what affected people should do, and a commitment to update — plus a short and a long version."
---
# Incident Public Statement Skill
A public statement is judged in seconds: does it acknowledge the problem, take responsibility, and tell people
what to do? This skill writes that statement — honest, human, and specific — avoiding both the legalese that
reads as evasion and the over-promising that creates the next problem. (Need the whole coordinated response,
not just the statement? Use [`pr-crisis-response`](../pr-crisis-response/SKILL.md).)
## Working from a brief
Given a one-line incident description, **produce the full statement anyway** — infer the likely impact and next
steps, label assumptions, and clearly bracket only the genuinely incident-specific facts the user must confirm
before publishing (numbers, dates, scope). Never refuse for missing detail; flag legally sensitive claims for review.
## Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (else infer and label):
- **What happened** — the incident, when it started/was discovered, and current status.
- **Who's affected and how** — scope and the concrete impact on them.
- **What you're doing** — the response so far and what's next.
- **What affected people should do** — the specific action (reset password, watch for X, no action needed).
- **Voice & constraints** — tone, and anything legal/regulatory you can't yet say.
## Output Format
### Public Statement: [incident]
**Statement (publish-ready)** — in this order:
1. **Acknowledge** — name the issue plainly in the first sentence; don't bury it.
2. **What happened** — a brief, factual account (confirmed only); say what's still being investigated.
3. **Impact** — who/what is affected, specifically and honestly.
4. **What we're doing** — the actions taken and underway, with accountability (no blame-shifting).
5. **What you should do** — the clear next step for affected people, or "no action needed" if true.
6. **Our commitment** — that you'll share an update by a stated time, and how to get help/contact.
Then provide:
- **Short version** — 2–3 sentences for social / status page / SMS.
- **Notes** — bracketed facts to confirm before publishing, and any line flagged for legal review.
## Quality Checks
- [ ] The first sentence acknowledges the issue directly — no warm-up, no burying
- [ ] Only confirmed facts are stated; open items are named as "under investigation"
- [ ] It takes responsibility without speculating on cause or shifting blame
- [ ] Affected people get a clear, specific action (or an honest "no action needed")
- [ ] It commits to a next update by a stated time
- [ ] Both a full and a short version are provided; sensitive claims flagged for review
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not open with self-congratulation or context-setting — lead with the acknowledgement
- [ ] Do not use evasive legalese ("issues may have impacted some users") when you can be specific
- [ ] Do not speculate on cause or promise outcomes you can't guarantee
- [ ] Do not state numbers/scope you haven't confirmed — bracket them for confirmation
- [ ] Do not omit what the reader should actually do next
## Based On
Incident communication practice — prompt acknowledgement, factual transparency, accountability, and clear guidance for affected people.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!