Put your first client agreement in writing — the eight clauses a simple service contract must have, in plain language a non-lawyer can use, with the blanks filled from your actual deal. Use when asked write my first client contract, what should a freelance agreement include, my client wants to start without a contract, or review this simple services agreement. Produces the plain-language agreement draft with the eight load-bearing clauses, the per-clause reasoning, the how-to-send-it script, ...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill first-client-contract --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of First Client Contract?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mohitagw15856-first-client-contract-pm-claude-skills)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: first-client-contract
description: "Put your first client agreement in writing — the eight clauses a simple service contract must have, in plain language a non-lawyer can use, with the blanks filled from your actual deal. Use when asked write my first client contract, what should a freelance agreement include, my client wants to start without a contract, or review this simple services agreement. Produces the plain-language agreement draft with the eight load-bearing clauses, the per-clause reasoning, the how-to-send-it script, and the when-this-needs-a-lawyer triggers."
---
# First Client Contract Skill
The first client contract's job isn't winning lawsuits — it's *preventing misunderstandings between honest people*, which is 95% of what goes wrong. A one-page plain-language agreement covering eight things (who, what, when, how much, what's extra, who owns what, how either side exits, what happens late) beats both alternatives: the handshake (where scope and payment live in two different memories) and the 30-page template (which nobody reads, including its sender). This skill drafts that page from the actual deal — and names plainly when the stakes have outgrown it.
## What This Skill Produces
- **The agreement draft** — one to two pages, plain language, the eight clauses filled from the real deal
- **The per-clause reasoning** — why each exists, told through the failure it prevents
- **The send script** — how to introduce a contract without making it weird ("this just makes sure we're aligned")
- **The lawyer triggers** — the situations where this simple form stops being enough, listed honestly
## Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- **The deal** — what's being delivered, by when, for how much, paid how (the draft is only as real as these)
- **The scope edges** — revisions included? Meetings? Support after delivery? The extras that will otherwise be argued about later get written now (chain: [scope-creep-response](../scope-creep-response/SKILL.md) is cheaper to never need)
- **The work's nature** — creative work makes the IP clause load-bearing; ongoing work makes termination load-bearing; the draft weights accordingly
- **Jurisdiction, loosely** — a governing-law line and any local formality get flagged verify-locally; the skill drafts structure, not local law
## Framework: The Eight Clauses
1. **Parties & scope (the misunderstanding killer):** who, and *specifically* what — deliverables enumerated, not described by vibe ("a website" vs. "a 5-page site: home, about, services, blog, contact — content provided by client"). The scope clause prevents more disputes than the other seven combined.
2. **Timeline with dependencies:** dates, and the client's obligations stated ("timeline shifts day-for-day with delays in client content/feedback") — the clause that protects against the client's own lateness becoming your breach.
3. **Price and payment terms:** the amount, the schedule (deposit % up front — normal and healthy; milestone or on-delivery for the rest), invoice terms (net-X), and the late line (chain: [late-invoice-escalation](../late-invoice-escalation/SKILL.md) works far better with this clause behind it).
4. **What's extra:** revisions included (a number), meetings included (a number), and the sentence that handles everything else: "work beyond this scope is quoted separately before it begins." This clause is the scope-creep vaccine.
5. **Ownership & credit:** who owns the work product and *when* (standard protective form: on full payment — flagged as a choice), what the freelancer may show in a portfolio, whether background tools/libraries stay the freelancer's.
6. **Termination (both directions):** either side can exit with N days' notice; work completed to date gets paid; deposits' fate stated. The clause everyone hopes is decorative and occasionally isn't.
7. **The reasonable-limits line:** liability capped at fees paid, no consequential damages — in plain words, flagged as jurisdiction-sensitive (enforceability varies — verify locally for real stakes).
8. **Signatures and the boring details:** dates, governing law (verify-locally), and the line that says email counts for approvals — because it's where approvals actually happen.
**The lawyer triggers, stated with the draft:** deal size that would hurt to lose, IP that's the client's crown jewels, exclusivity/non-compete asks, liability-heavy work, anything cross-border, or a counterparty redlining hard — at those stakes, this draft becomes the *brief you bring to a lawyer*, which is still a great use of it.
## Output Format
# Services Agreement: [freelancer] × [client] — [project]
[The draft, 1–2 pages, all eight clauses filled from the real deal, plain language throughout, verify-locally flags inline where local law matters]
## Why Each Clause (for you, not the client)
[Per clause: the failure it prevents, in one line]
## Sending It
["Attached is a simple agreement so we're fully aligned on scope and terms — nothing exotic, mostly what we discussed written down. Any questions, happy to walk through it."]
## When This Isn't Enough
[The lawyer triggers, assessed against this deal — with the honest verdict]
> A plain-language agreement between honest parties, not legal advice — enforceability details vary by jurisdiction; past the named triggers, a lawyer reviews (and this draft makes that review fast and cheap).
## Quality Checks
- [ ] Scope enumerates deliverables — nothing described by vibe
- [ ] Revisions and meetings carry numbers; the everything-else-is-quoted sentence appears
- [ ] Payment includes deposit, schedule, terms, and the late line
- [ ] Ownership states its timing (payment-linked) and the portfolio right
- [ ] The lawyer triggers are assessed against this actual deal, not just listed
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not draft legalese — plain language honest parties both read beats boilerplate nobody does
- [ ] Do not start work on "we'll sort the paperwork later" — the deposit + signature IS the sorting
- [ ] Do not leave revisions uncounted — "reasonable revisions" is a fight with a fuse lit
- [ ] Do not transfer IP before payment completes without flagging the choice being made
- [ ] Do not pretend this scales to every deal — the triggers list is load-bearing honesty
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!