Test-Driven Development workflow specialist using RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle for test-first software development. Use when developing new features from scratch, creating isolated modules, or when behavior specification drives implementation. Do NOT use for refactoring existing code (use moai-workflow-ddd instead) or when behavior preservation is the primary goal.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add modu-ai/moai-rank --skill moai-workflow-tdd --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Moai Workflow Tdd?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/modu-ai-moai-workflow-tdd-moai-rank)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: moai-workflow-tdd
description: >
Test-Driven Development workflow specialist using RED-GREEN-REFACTOR
cycle for test-first software development.
Use when developing new features from scratch, creating isolated modules,
or when behavior specification drives implementation.
Do NOT use for refactoring existing code (use moai-workflow-ddd instead)
or when behavior preservation is the primary goal.
license: Apache-2.0
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash(pytest:*) Bash(ruff:*) Bash(npm:*) Bash(npx:*) Bash(node:*) Bash(jest:*) Bash(vitest:*) Bash(go:*) Bash(cargo:*) Bash(mix:*) Bash(uv:*) Bash(bundle:*) Bash(php:*) Bash(phpunit:*) Grep Glob mcp__context7__resolve-library-id mcp__context7__get-library-docs
user-invocable: false
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
category: "workflow"
status: "active"
updated: "2026-02-03"
modularized: "true"
tags: "workflow, tdd, test-driven, red-green-refactor, test-first"
author: "MoAI-ADK Team"
context: "fork"
agent: "manager-tdd"
related-skills: "moai-workflow-ddd, moai-workflow-testing, moai-foundation-quality"
# MoAI Extension: Progressive Disclosure
progressive_disclosure:
enabled: true
level1_tokens: 100
level2_tokens: 5000
# MoAI Extension: Triggers
triggers:
keywords: ["TDD", "test-driven development", "red-green-refactor", "test-first", "new feature", "greenfield"]
phases: ["run"]
agents: ["manager-tdd", "expert-backend", "expert-frontend", "expert-testing"]
---
# Test-Driven Development (TDD) Workflow
## Development Mode Configuration (CRITICAL)
[NOTE] This workflow is selected based on `.moai/config/sections/quality.yaml`:
```yaml
constitution:
development_mode: hybrid # or ddd, tdd
hybrid_settings:
new_features: tdd # New code → use TDD (this workflow)
legacy_refactoring: ddd # Existing code → use DDD
```
**When to use this workflow**:
- `development_mode: tdd` → Always use TDD
- `development_mode: hybrid` + new package/module → Use TDD
- `development_mode: hybrid` + refactoring existing code → Use DDD instead (moai-workflow-ddd)
**Key distinction**:
- **New file/package** (doesn't exist yet) → TDD (this workflow)
- **Existing code** (file already exists) → DDD (ANALYZE-PRESERVE-IMPROVE)
## Quick Reference
Test-Driven Development provides a disciplined approach for creating new functionality where tests define the expected behavior before implementation.
Core Cycle - RED-GREEN-REFACTOR:
- RED: Write a failing test that defines desired behavior
- GREEN: Write minimal code to make the test pass
- REFACTOR: Improve code structure while keeping tests green
When to Use TDD:
- Creating new functionality from scratch
- Building isolated modules with no existing dependencies
- When behavior specification drives development
- New API endpoints with clear contracts
- New UI components with defined behavior
- Greenfield projects (rare - usually Hybrid is better)
When NOT to Use TDD:
- Refactoring existing code (use DDD instead)
- When behavior preservation is the primary goal
- Legacy codebase without test coverage (use DDD first)
- When modifying existing files (consider Hybrid mode)
---
## Core Philosophy
### TDD vs DDD Comparison
TDD Approach:
- Cycle: RED-GREEN-REFACTOR
- Goal: Create new functionality through tests
- Starting Point: No code exists
- Test Type: Specification tests that define expected behavior
- Outcome: New working code with test coverage
DDD Approach:
- Cycle: ANALYZE-PRESERVE-IMPROVE
- Goal: Improve structure without behavior change
- Starting Point: Existing code with defined behavior
- Test Type: Characterization tests that capture current behavior
- Outcome: Better structured code with identical behavior
### Test-First Principle
The golden rule of TDD is that tests must be written before implementation code:
- Tests define the contract
- Tests document expected behavior
- Tests catch regressions immediately
- Implementation is driven by test requirements
---
## Implementation Guide
### Phase 1: RED - Write a Failing Test
The RED phase focuses on defining the desired behavior through a failing test.
#### Writing Effective Tests
Before writing any implementation code:
- Understand the requirement clearly
- Define the expected behavior in test form
- Write one test at a time
- Keep tests focused and specific
- Use descriptive test names that document behavior
#### Test Structure
Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert pattern:
- Arrange: Set up test data and dependencies
- Act: Execute the code under test
- Assert: Verify the expected outcome
#### Verification
The test must fail initially:
- Confirms the test actually tests something
- Ensures the test is not passing by accident
- Documents the gap between current and desired state
### Phase 2: GREEN - Make the Test Pass
The GREEN phase focuses on writing minimal code to satisfy the test.
#### Minimal Implementation
Write only enough code to make the test pass:
- Do not over-engineer
- Do not add features not required by tests
- Focus on correctness, not perfection
- Hardcode values if necessary (refactor later)
#### Verification
Run the test to confirm it passes:
- All assertions must succeed
- No other tests should break
- Implementation satisfies the test requirements
### Phase 3: REFACTOR - Improve the Code
The REFACTOR phase focuses on improving code quality while maintaining behavior.
#### Safe Refactoring
With passing tests as a safety net:
- Remove duplication
- Improve naming and readability
- Extract methods and classes
- Apply design patterns where appropriate
#### Continuous Verification
After each refactoring step:
- Run all tests
- If any test fails, revert immediately
- Commit when tests pass
---
## TDD Workflow Execution
### Standard TDD Session
When executing TDD through manager-tdd:
Step 1 - Understand Requirements:
- Read SPEC document for feature scope
- Identify test cases from acceptance criteria
- Plan test implementation order
Step 2 - RED Phase:
- Write first failing test
- Verify test fails for the right reason
- Document expected behavior
Step 3 - GREEN Phase:
- Write minimal implementation
- Run test to verify it passes
- Move to next test
Step 4 - REFACTOR Phase:
- Review code for improvements
- Apply refactoring with tests as safety net
- Commit clean code
Step 5 - Repeat:
- Continue RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle
- Until all requirements are implemented
- Until all acceptance criteria pass
### TDD Loop Pattern
For features requiring multiple test cases:
- Identify all test cases upfront
- Prioritize by dependency and complexity
- Execute RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for each
- Maintain cumulative test suite
---
## Quality Metrics
### TDD Success Criteria
Test Coverage (Required):
- Minimum 80% coverage per commit
- 90% recommended for new code
- All public interfaces tested
Code Quality (Goals):
- All tests pass
- No test written after implementation
- Clear test names documenting behavior
- Minimal implementation satisfying tests
### TDD-Specific TRUST Validation
Apply TRUST 5 framework with TDD focus:
- Testability: Test-first approach ensures testability
- Readability: Tests document expected behavior
- Understandability: Tests serve as living documentation
- Security: Security tests written before implementation
- Transparency: Test failures provide immediate feedback
---
## Integration Points
### With DDD Workflow
TDD and DDD are complementary:
- TDD for new code
- DDD for existing code refactoring
- Hybrid mode combines both approaches
### With Testing Workflow
TDD integrates with testing workflow:
- Uses specification tests
- Integrates with coverage tools
- Supports mutation testing for test quality
### With Quality Framework
TDD outputs feed into quality assessment:
- Coverage metrics tracked
- TRUST 5 validation for changes
- Quality gates enforce standards
---
## Troubleshooting
### Common Issues
Test is Too Complex:
- Break into smaller, focused tests
- Test one behavior at a time
- Use test fixtures for complex setup
Implementation Grows Too Fast:
- Resist urge to implement untested features
- Return to RED phase for new functionality
- Keep GREEN phase minimal
Refactoring Breaks Tests:
- Revert immediately
- Refactor in smaller steps
- Ensure tests verify behavior, not implementation
### Recovery Procedures
When TDD discipline breaks down:
- Stop and assess current state
- Write characterization tests for existing code
- Resume TDD for remaining features
- Consider switching to Hybrid mode
---
Version: 1.0.0
Status: Active
Last Updated: 2026-02-03
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!