Juicebox V5 vs V5.1 contract version separation rules. Use when: (1) determining which contracts to use for a project, (2) versioned contracts show unexpected behavior, (3) transactions fail with "invalid terminal" or similar errors, (4) deploying new projects vs interacting with existing projects. CRITICAL: Versioned contracts must never mix.
Scanned 9/7/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add modbender/skill-library-mcp --skill jb-v5-v51-contracts --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jb V5 V51 Contracts?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/modbender-jb-v5-v51-contracts)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jb-v5-v51-contracts
description: |
Juicebox V5 vs V5.1 contract version separation rules. Use when: (1) determining which
contracts to use for a project, (2) versioned contracts show unexpected behavior,
(3) transactions fail with "invalid terminal" or similar errors, (4) deploying new
projects vs interacting with existing projects. CRITICAL: Versioned contracts must never mix.
---
# Juicebox V5 vs V5.1 Contract Separation
## Problem
Juicebox has two contract versions: V5 (original) and V5.1 (upgraded). When contracts
have both versions, mixing them causes transactions to fail. A project using
JBController5_1 MUST use JBMultiTerminal5_1, not the V5 terminal.
## Context / Trigger Conditions
- Deploying new projects or terminals
- Transactions failing with "invalid terminal" or permission errors
- Querying rulesets returns unexpected data
- Paying a project fails despite correct addresses
- Determining which contracts to use for a given project
## Solution
### The Rule
**When a contract has both V5 and V5.1 versions, you MUST use matching versions.**
Contracts that only have ONE version (no 5_1 variant) work with both V5 and V5.1 projects.
### Detecting Project Version (CRITICAL)
**IMPORTANT: Some non-revnet projects also use V5.0 contracts.** You cannot assume that
a project is on V5.1 just because it's not a revnet. The ONLY authoritative way to
determine which contracts a project uses is to query `JBDirectory.controllerOf()`.
**Always check JBDirectory.controllerOf() to get the actual controller address, then
compare against known V5 and V5.1 controller addresses.**
```typescript
const JB_DIRECTORY = '0x0061e516886a0540f63157f112c0588ee0651dcf'
const JB_CONTROLLER_V5 = '0x27da30646502e2f642be5281322ae8c394f7668a'
const JB_CONTROLLER_V5_1 = '0xf3cc99b11bd73a2e3b8815fb85fe0381b29987e1'
// Query JBDirectory for the project's controller
const controller = await publicClient.readContract({
address: JB_DIRECTORY,
abi: JB_DIRECTORY_ABI,
functionName: 'controllerOf',
args: [BigInt(projectId)],
})
// Determine version by comparing controller address
const isV5 = controller.toLowerCase() === JB_CONTROLLER_V5.toLowerCase()
const isV5_1 = controller.toLowerCase() === JB_CONTROLLER_V5_1.toLowerCase()
if (isV5) {
// Use V5.0 contracts (JBMultiTerminal, JBRulesets, etc.)
} else if (isV5_1) {
// Use V5.1 contracts (JBMultiTerminal5_1, JBRulesets5_1, etc.)
} else {
// Unknown controller - handle edge case
}
```
**Why not check owner?** While revnets are owned by REVDeployer and always use V5.0,
some regular projects deployed before V5.1 also use V5.0. Checking the owner only
tells you if it's a revnet, not which contract version the project actually uses.
### Contract Address Reference
**Shared Contracts (work with BOTH V5 and V5.1)**
| Contract | Address |
|----------|---------|
| JBProjects | 0x885f707efa18d2cb12f05a3a8eba6b4b26c8c1d4 |
| JBTokens | 0x4d0edd347fb1fa21589c1e109b3474924be87636 |
| JBDirectory | 0x0061e516886a0540f63157f112c0588ee0651dcf |
| JBSplits | 0x7160a322fea44945a6ef9adfd65c322258df3c5e |
| JBFundAccessLimits | 0x3a46b21720c8b70184b0434a2293b2fdcc497ce7 |
| JBPermissions | 0xba948dab74e875b19cf0e2ca7a4546c0c2defc40 |
| JBPrices | 0x6e92e3b5ce1e7a4344c6d27c0c54efd00df92fb6 |
| JBFeelessAddresses | 0xf76f7124f73abc7c30b2f76121afd4c52be19442 |
**V5.1 Contracts (for NEW projects)**
| Contract | Address |
|----------|---------|
| JBController5_1 | 0xf3cc99b11bd73a2e3b8815fb85fe0381b29987e1 |
| JBMultiTerminal5_1 | 0x52869db3d61dde1e391967f2ce5039ad0ecd371c |
| JBRulesets5_1 | 0xd4257005ca8d27bbe11f356453b0e4692414b056 |
| JBTerminalStore5_1 | 0x82239c5a21f0e09573942caa41c580fa36e27071 |
| JBOmnichainDeployer5_1 | 0x587bf86677ec0d1b766d9ba0d7ac2a51c6c2fc71 |
**V5 Contracts (for REVNETS)**
| Contract | Address |
|----------|---------|
| JBController | 0x27da30646502e2f642be5281322ae8c394f7668a |
| JBMultiTerminal | 0x2db6d704058e552defe415753465df8df0361846 |
| JBRulesets | 0x6292281d69c3593fcf6ea074e5797341476ab428 |
| REVDeployer | 0x2ca27bde7e7d33e353b44c27acfcf6c78dde251d |
### Code Pattern
```typescript
// Known controller addresses (same on all chains via CREATE2)
const CONTROLLERS = {
V5: '0x27da30646502e2f642be5281322ae8c394f7668a',
V5_1: '0xf3cc99b11bd73a2e3b8815fb85fe0381b29987e1',
}
// Versioned contracts by version
const VERSIONED_CONTRACTS = {
V5: {
controller: '0x27da30646502e2f642be5281322ae8c394f7668a', // JBController
terminal: '0x2db6d704058e552defe415753465df8df0361846', // JBMultiTerminal
rulesets: '0x6292281d69c3593fcf6ea074e5797341476ab428', // JBRulesets
},
V5_1: {
controller: '0xf3cc99b11bd73a2e3b8815fb85fe0381b29987e1', // JBController5_1
terminal: '0x52869db3d61dde1e391967f2ce5039ad0ecd371c', // JBMultiTerminal5_1
rulesets: '0xd4257005ca8d27bbe11f356453b0e4692414b056', // JBRulesets5_1
},
}
// Shared contracts work with any project
const SHARED = {
directory: '0x0061e516886a0540f63157f112c0588ee0651dcf',
splits: '0x7160a322fea44945a6ef9adfd65c322258df3c5e',
fundAccessLimits: '0x3a46b21720c8b70184b0434a2293b2fdcc497ce7',
projects: '0x885f707efa18d2cb12f05a3a8eba6b4b26c8c1d4',
tokens: '0x4d0edd347fb1fa21589c1e109b3474924be87636',
}
// Helper to get correct contracts for a project
// ALWAYS queries JBDirectory.controllerOf() - the ONLY authoritative source
async function getContractsForProject(projectId: number): Promise<{
controller: `0x${string}`,
terminal: `0x${string}`,
rulesets: `0x${string}`,
version: 'V5' | 'V5_1',
}> {
// Step 1: Query JBDirectory for the project's actual controller
const controller = await publicClient.readContract({
address: SHARED.directory,
abi: JB_DIRECTORY_ABI,
functionName: 'controllerOf',
args: [BigInt(projectId)],
})
// Step 2: Determine version by comparing controller address
const controllerLower = controller.toLowerCase()
if (controllerLower === CONTROLLERS.V5.toLowerCase()) {
return { ...VERSIONED_CONTRACTS.V5, version: 'V5' }
}
if (controllerLower === CONTROLLERS.V5_1.toLowerCase()) {
return { ...VERSIONED_CONTRACTS.V5_1, version: 'V5_1' }
}
// Unknown controller - this shouldn't happen for valid Juicebox projects
throw new Error(`Unknown controller ${controller} for project ${projectId}`)
}
```
### Cast Command to Check Version
```bash
# Get controller for a project - this is the authoritative source
cast call 0x0061e516886a0540f63157f112c0588ee0651dcf \
"controllerOf(uint256)(address)" $PROJECT_ID --rpc-url $RPC_URL
# Compare result:
# 0x27da30646502e2f642be5281322ae8c394f7668a = V5.0
# 0xf3cc99b11bd73a2e3b8815fb85fe0381b29987e1 = V5.1
```
## Verification
- Payment transactions succeed without "invalid terminal" errors
- Ruleset queries return expected data
- Project creation uses correct contract set
## Example
Paying NANA (Project #1, a Revnet):
```bash
cast call 0x0061e516886a0540f63157f112c0588ee0651dcf "controllerOf(uint256)(address)" 1
# Returns: 0x27da30646502e2f642be5281322ae8c394f7668a (V5 controller)
# → Use V5 contracts: JBMultiTerminal 0x2db6d704058e552defe415753465df8df0361846
```
Paying a project deployed with V5.1:
```bash
cast call 0x0061e516886a0540f63157f112c0588ee0651dcf "controllerOf(uint256)(address)" 123
# Returns: 0xf3cc99b11bd73a2e3b8815fb85fe0381b29987e1 (V5.1 controller)
# → Use V5.1 contracts: JBMultiTerminal5_1 0x52869db3d61dde1e391967f2ce5039ad0ecd371c
```
## Notes
- **CRITICAL**: Always check `JBDirectory.controllerOf()` to determine version - never assume based on ownership
- Some non-revnet projects use V5.0 contracts (deployed before V5.1 existed)
- All addresses are deterministic across all chains (Ethereum, Optimism, Base, Arbitrum)
- JBOmnichainDeployer5_1 deploys to all chains at once using V5.1 contracts
- Source of truth: [nana-core-v5/deployments](https://github.com/Bananapus/nana-core-v5/tree/main/deployments) and [docs.juicebox.money/dev/v5/addresses](https://docs.juicebox.money/dev/v5/addresses)
## References
- JBDirectory (for controllerOf lookup): 0x0061e516886a0540f63157f112c0588ee0651dcf
- JBController V5: 0x27da30646502e2f642be5281322ae8c394f7668a
- JBController V5.1: 0xf3cc99b11bd73a2e3b8815fb85fe0381b29987e1
- Official docs: https://docs.juicebox.money/dev/v5/addresses
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!