Risk-aware support response governance with persona-weighted consensus. Detects legal/sensitive/confidentiality issues, applies hard-block policy checks, and writes auditable decision artifacts for customer-facing automation.
Scanned 9/7/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add modbender/skill-library-mcp --skill consensus-support-reply-guard --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Consensus Support Reply Guard?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/modbender-consensus-support-reply-guard)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: consensus-support-reply-guard
description: Risk-aware support response governance with persona-weighted consensus. Detects legal/sensitive/confidentiality issues, applies hard-block policy checks, and writes auditable decision artifacts for customer-facing automation.
version: 1.1.14
homepage: https://github.com/kaicianflone/consensus-support-reply-guard
source: https://github.com/kaicianflone/consensus-support-reply-guard
upstream:
consensus-guard-core: https://github.com/kaicianflone/consensus-guard-core
requires:
bins:
- node
- tsx
env:
- CONSENSUS_STATE_FILE
- CONSENSUS_STATE_ROOT
metadata:
openclaw:
requires:
bins:
- node
- tsx
env:
- CONSENSUS_STATE_FILE
- CONSENSUS_STATE_ROOT
install:
- kind: node
package: consensus-support-reply-guard
bins:
- node
- tsx
---
# consensus-support-reply-guard
`consensus-support-reply-guard` is a customer-trust guard for support workflows.
## What this skill does
- evaluates support drafts before sending
- detects high-risk claim patterns
- blocks or rewrites responses when policy violations appear
- updates persona reputations based on final decision alignment
- preserves decision history in board artifacts
## Why this matters
Support replies are high-frequency and brand-critical. This skill prevents overconfident legal/PII mistakes at scale.
## Ecosystem role
Composes with consensus board state using explicit vote inputs and deterministic guard decisions.
## Ideal scenarios
- automated ticket triage replies
- L1/L2 AI response review gates
- regulated or enterprise support channels
## Runtime, credentials, and network behavior
- runtime binaries: `node`, `tsx`
- network calls: none in the guard decision path itself
- filesystem writes: board/state artifacts under the configured consensus state path
## Dependency trust model
- `consensus-guard-core` is the first-party consensus package used in guard execution
- versions are semver-pinned in `package.json` for reproducible installs
- this skill does not request host-wide privileges and does not mutate other skills
## Quick start
```bash
node --import tsx run.js --input ./examples/input.json
```
## Tool-call integration
This skill is wired to the consensus-interact contract boundary (via shared consensus-guard-core wrappers where applicable):
- readBoardPolicy
- getLatestPersonaSet / getPersonaSet
- writeArtifact / writeDecision
- idempotent decision lookup
This keeps board orchestration standardized across skills.
## Invoke Contract
This skill exposes a canonical entrypoint:
- `invoke(input, opts?) -> Promise<OutputJson | ErrorJson>`
`invoke()` starts the guard flow and executes deterministic policy evaluation with board operations via shared guard-core wrappers.
## external_agent mode
Guards support two modes:
- `mode="external_agent"`: caller supplies `external_votes[]` from agents/humans/models for deterministic aggregation.
- `mode="persona"`: requires an existing `persona_set_id`; guard will not generate persona sets internally.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!