Builds the first complete research-paper draft from the confirmed spine, evidence bank, claim register, citation bank, and writing rationale matrix.
Scanned 6/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mmTheBest/Research-Architect --skill research-architect-draft --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Research Architect Draft?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mmthebest-research-architect-draft)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: research-architect-draft
description: Builds the first complete research-paper draft from the confirmed spine, evidence bank, claim register, citation bank, and writing rationale matrix.
---
# First Paper Draft
Use this branch only after the upstream research-construction artifacts exist.
## Blocking inputs
Do not draft unless these files exist or their equivalents are provided:
```text
paper_output/confirmed_research_spine.md
paper_output/evidence_bank.md
paper_output/claim_register.md
paper_output/citation_support_bank.md
paper_output/section_blueprints.md
paper_output/writing_rationale_matrix.md
```
If evidence is missing, write a research execution plan instead of a draft.
## Required outputs
Create:
```text
paper_output/section_blueprints.md
paper_output/writing_rationale_matrix.md
paper_output/first_draft/main.md
paper_output/final_artifact_manifest.md
```
Optional when useful:
```text
paper_output/first_draft/main.tex
```
## Draft architecture
Choose a structure that fits the research spine and evidence mode. Common functions include:
- title;
- abstract or summary;
- introduction;
- background or related work;
- methods or study design;
- results or analysis;
- discussion;
- limitations;
- conclusion.
Do not force a fixed structure when the project requires a different one.
## Drafting rules
- The abstract must be a compressed version of the research spine.
- The introduction must move from problem to gap to contribution.
- Methods must include enough detail to evaluate the claim.
- Results must follow the evidence chain, not the order in which work happened.
- Discussion must separate interpretation from speculation.
- Limitations must state what the paper does not prove.
- Every central claim must map to evidence IDs or citation IDs.
- Do not cite unverified sources unless explicitly marked as needing verification.
## Writing rationale matrix
Use:
| Row ID | Manuscript Unit | Planned Function | Research-Spine Link | Literature/Exemplar Pattern Learned | Evidence or Citation Anchor | Planned Text Move | Claim Boundary | Final Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Write this matrix before or while drafting, not after.
## Output behavior
The draft can be rough, but it must be logically complete. Mark uncertain claims with `TODO_VERIFY`, missing results with `TODO_EVIDENCE`, and citation gaps with `TODO_CITATION` rather than hiding them.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!