Converts a raw topic or scattered materials into feasible research-question candidates and candidate research spines.
Scanned 6/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mmTheBest/Research-Architect --skill research-architect-brainstorm --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Research Architect Brainstorm?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mmthebest-research-architect-brainstorm)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: research-architect-brainstorm
description: Converts a raw topic or scattered materials into feasible research-question candidates and candidate research spines.
---
# First Paper Brainstorm
Use this branch after intake and before literature mapping when the user needs to turn a vague direction into a paper-capable idea.
## Inputs
Read:
```text
paper_output/project_config.json
paper_output/source_map.md
paper_output/source_inventory.md
```
## Brainstorming lenses
Generate candidates using these lenses:
1. **Problem lens:** What unresolved problem or bottleneck is visible?
2. **Material lens:** What can the user actually analyze, build, observe, or test?
3. **Method lens:** What method, model, experiment, theory, or framework could be compared, extended, simplified, or evaluated?
4. **Evidence lens:** What claim could be supported with feasible evidence?
5. **Failure lens:** Where might the approach fail, and would that failure clarify scope?
6. **Reader-value lens:** What would a reader learn that is not obvious from prior work?
## Required outputs
Create:
```text
paper_output/problem_landscape.md
paper_output/idea_candidate_matrix.md
paper_output/research_question_options.md
paper_output/feasibility_filter.md
```
## Candidate matrix
Use:
| Candidate ID | Problem | Candidate Research Question | Possible Contribution | Needed Evidence | Available Evidence | Missing Evidence | Feasibility | Novelty Risk | Claim Risk | Next Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
## Filtering
Classify candidates as:
- `advance`: strong enough for literature mapping;
- `needs_more_material`: promising but missing evidence;
- `defer`: too broad, too risky, or not answerable;
- `reject`: unsupported or already solved.
## Output behavior
Present 2-5 candidate research directions. Do not choose final motivation alone. The final spine must be confirmed after literature mapping.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!