Audits the first-paper workflow artifacts and draft for spine clarity, evidence traceability, citation integrity, copying risk, and overclaiming.
Scanned 6/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mmTheBest/Research-Architect --skill research-architect-audit --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Research Architect Audit?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mmthebest-research-architect-audit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: research-architect-audit
description: Audits the first-paper workflow artifacts and draft for spine clarity, evidence traceability, citation integrity, copying risk, and overclaiming.
---
# First Paper Audit
Use this branch before declaring the first draft complete.
## Inputs
Read all available artifacts under:
```text
paper_output/
```
Especially:
```text
confirmed_research_spine.md
evidence_bank.md
claim_register.md
citation_support_bank.md
section_blueprints.md
writing_rationale_matrix.md
first_draft/main.md
```
## Required outputs
Create:
```text
paper_output/audit_report.md
paper_output/revision_queue.md
```
## Audit gates
| Gate | Blocking Failure Examples |
|---|---|
| Research spine clarity | no bounded problem/gap/claim/scope |
| Feasibility | claim depends on evidence not available or planned |
| Literature grounding | sources summarized but not mapped to gap/method/baseline |
| Study design validity | no comparison/control/evaluation criteria when needed |
| Evidence traceability | claims lack evidence IDs or citation IDs |
| Figure logic | figure has no argument function or caption overclaims |
| Citation integrity | invented, unverifiable, or misused citations |
| Non-copying | text/figure/claim too close to exemplar source |
| Draft completeness | missing methods, limitations, or results needed for claim |
| Overclaim control | causal/general/mechanistic claims exceed design |
## Audit report schema
| Gate | Status | Evidence Checked | Problem Found | Required Fix | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Severity values:
- `BLOCKED`: must fix before using the draft;
- `MAJOR`: weakens central argument;
- `MINOR`: improves clarity or polish;
- `PASS`: no issue found.
## Revision queue schema
| Priority | Fix | Affected Section | Required Upstream Artifact | Owner/Next Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## Rules
- Do not silently fix major logic failures only in prose. Route back to the upstream artifact that owns the failure.
- If the claim register is weak, return to `research-architect-evidence`.
- If citations are weak, return to `research-architect-citation`.
- If the motivation is weak or unsupported, return to `research-architect-literature` or `research-architect-brainstorm`.
- If the study cannot support the claim, return to `research-architect-design`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!