Skip to content
Back to skills

Program Planning Skill

ASecurity

Expertise in creating and executing vendor replacement programs using the proven 30-60-90 day framework, including milestone planning, resource allocation, dependency management, and phase gate governance.

  • 82 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added February 10, 2026
businessgogitapifrontendbackendsecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 21 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add mitkox/fteplusai --skill skills --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Program Planning Skill?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Program Planning Skill
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mitkox-program-planning-skill/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mitkox-program-planning-skill)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
skill: 'program-planning'
version: '2.0.0'
updated: '2025-12-31'
category: 'organizational'
complexity: 'advanced'
prerequisite_skills: []
composable_with:
  - 'milestone-tracking'
  - 'stakeholder-management'
  - 'risk-assessment'
  - 'change-management'
---

# Program Planning Skill

## Overview
Expertise in creating and executing vendor replacement programs using the proven 30-60-90 day framework, including milestone planning, resource allocation, dependency management, and phase gate governance.

## Core Framework: 30-60-90 Day Planning

### Phase Structure

**Phase 1: Planning & Preparation (Days 1-30)**
- **Focus:** Build foundation, make decisions, prepare for action
- **Key Activities:** Business case, tool selection, team prep, risk assessment
- **Deliverables:** Approved plan, selected tools, trained pilot team, baseline metrics
- **Success Criteria:** Executive approval, budget allocated, team ready

**Phase 2: Pilot & Validation (Days 31-60)**
- **Focus:** Prove the approach works with real projects
- **Key Activities:** Pilot execution, metrics tracking, vendor comparison, validation
- **Deliverables:** Quality data, cost validation, Go/No-Go decision
- **Success Criteria:** Quality ≥90% vendor, cost validated, team satisfied

**Phase 3: Transition & Scale (Days 61-90)**
- **Focus:** Full rollout and vendor cutover
- **Key Activities:** Team training, vendor wind-down, cutover, optimization
- **Deliverables:** Full deployment, vendor exit, success validation
- **Success Criteria:** Production live, vendor exited, ROI achieved

### Planning Principles

1. **Start with the End:** Define success criteria before planning
2. **Phase Gates:** Clear go/no-go decisions between phases
3. **Risk-Based:** Identify and mitigate risks proactively
4. **Iterative:** Adjust plan based on learnings
5. **Stakeholder-Driven:** Align with stakeholder needs and constraints
6. **Measurable:** Track progress with objective metrics
7. **Realistic:** Buffer for unknowns and learning curves
8. **Documented:** Write everything down, share widely

## Program Planning Process

### Step 1: Program Charter Development

**Program Charter Template:**
```markdown
# Vendor Replacement Program Charter

## Program Overview
**Name:** [Program Name]
**Sponsor:** [Executive Sponsor Name, Title]
**Manager:** [Program Manager Name]
**Duration:** [Start Date] - [End Date] (90 days)
**Budget:** $[Amount]

## Business Case
**Problem:** [Vendor pain points and costs]
**Solution:** [AI-augmented team approach]
**Expected Benefits:**
- Cost reduction: [X]% ($[Y]/year)
- Productivity gain: [X]x multiplier
- Quality improvement: [Metrics]
- Strategic value: [IP retention, flexibility, etc.]

## Scope

**In Scope:**
- [Function 1 - e.g., backend development]
- [Function 2 - e.g., API development]
- [Team size - e.g., 5 FTEs]

**Out of Scope:**
- [Function 3 - e.g., frontend development - future phase]
- [Constraint 1 - e.g., production support (vendor retained)]

**Success Criteria:**
- Phase 1: Executive approval, tools selected, team ready
- Phase 2: Pilot quality ≥90% vendor, cost validated
- Phase 3: Production live, vendor exited, 60% cost reduction

## Stakeholders
**Executive Sponsor:** [Name] - Budget approval, strategic decisions
**R&D Leadership:** [Name] - Team allocation, technical decisions
**Finance:** [Name] - Budget tracking, ROI validation
**Security/Compliance:** [Name] - Risk assessment, approval
**Vendor Account Manager:** [Name] - Transition coordination

## Assumptions
1. Executive budget approved by [date]
2. Pilot team available full-time for weeks 5-8
3. Vendor will cooperate with 90-day notice
4. No major production incidents during cutover
5. AI tools perform as demonstrated in POCs

## Constraints
1. Budget: $[X] maximum
2. Timeline: Must complete by [date] (fiscal year end)
3. Resources: 5 FTEs available, no new hires
4. Vendor contract: 90-day notice required
5. Risk tolerance: No production downtime acceptable

## Governance
- **Steering Committee:** [Members] - Monthly reviews
- **Program Team:** [Core members] - Weekly meetings
- **Phase Gates:** Day 30, Day 60, Day 90
- **Status Reporting:** Weekly to sponsor, monthly to executives
```

### Step 2: Milestone Planning

**Milestone Planning Framework:**
```markdown
## Program Milestones

### Phase 1 Milestones (Days 1-30)

**M1.1: Program Kickoff (Day 1)**
- Executive sponsor approval
- Program team assembled
- Communication plan launched

**M1.2: Business Case Complete (Day 7)**
- Executive presentation delivered
- Financial model finalized
- Board approval (if required)

**M1.3: Tool Selection (Day 14)**
- Evaluation completed
- Security cleared
- Procurement initiated

**M1.4: Pilot Team Ready (Day 21)**
- Team identified and committed
- Training curriculum complete
- Baseline metrics established

**M1.5: Phase Gate 1 (Day 30)**
- All deliverables complete
- Executive go-decision
- Pilot launch authorized

### Phase 2 Milestones (Days 31-60)

**M2.1: Pilot Launch (Day 31)**
- Tools deployed
- Team trained
- First project started

**M2.2: Parallel Run Start (Day 35)**
- Vendor and AI outputs being compared
- Metrics dashboard live
- Daily tracking initiated

**M2.3: Mid-Pilot Review (Day 45)**
- Preliminary results analyzed
- Issues addressed
- Plan adjustments made

**M2.4: Pilot Complete (Day 53)**
- All pilot projects finished
- Final metrics collected
- Team feedback gathered

**M2.5: Phase Gate 2 (Day 60)**
- Go/No-Go decision
- Full rollout approved
- Vendor transition plan finalized

### Phase 3 Milestones (Days 61-90)

**M3.1: Full Team Training (Day 65)**
- All team members trained
- Tools deployed organization-wide
- Support structure in place

**M3.2: Vendor Transition Start (Day 70)**
- Contract wind-down initiated
- Knowledge transfer executing
- Parallel run continuing

**M3.3: Cutover Ready (Day 80)**
- Knowledge transfer complete
- Quality parity achieved
- Cutover approved

**M3.4: Production Cutover (Day 85)**
- Vendor contract concluded
- Full internal operation
- Monitoring intensive

**M3.5: Phase Gate 3 / Program Close (Day 90)**
- Success metrics validated
- ROI achieved
- Program closed
```

### Step 3: Dependency Mapping

**Dependency Types:**
1. **Finish-to-Start (FS):** Task B can't start until Task A finishes
2. **Start-to-Start (SS):** Task B can't start until Task A starts
3. **Finish-to-Finish (FF):** Task B can't finish until Task A finishes
4. **Start-to-Finish (SF):** Task B can't finish until Task A starts (rare)

**Critical Path Analysis:**
```markdown
## Critical Path: Longest Dependent Chain

Day 1-7: Business Case → Budget Approval [CRITICAL]
  ↓
Day 8-14: Tool Selection → Security Clearance [CRITICAL]
  ↓
Day 15-21: Procurement → Tool Deployment [CRITICAL]
  ↓
Day 22-30: Training → Pilot Launch [CRITICAL]
  ↓
Day 31-60: Pilot Execution → Validation [CRITICAL]
  ↓
Day 61-70: Full Training → Team Readiness [CRITICAL]
  ↓
Day 71-85: Vendor Transition → Cutover [CRITICAL]

**Total Critical Path: 85 days**
**Buffer: 5 days**

Any delay on critical path delays entire program.
Non-critical tasks (e.g., documentation, case study) have slack.
```

### Step 4: Resource Allocation

**Resource Planning Template:**
```markdown
## Resource Allocation Plan

### Core Program Team (Full-time)
- **Program Manager:** 1 FTE × 90 days = 90 person-days
- **Change Manager:** 0.5 FTE × 90 days = 45 person-days
- **Technical Lead:** 0.5 FTE × 60 days = 30 person-days
**Total Core:** 165 person-days

### Pilot Team (Phase 2: Days 31-60)
- **Developers:** 5 FTE × 30 days = 150 person-days
- **QA/Validation:** 2 FTE × 30 days = 60 person-days
**Total Pilot:** 210 person-days

### Full Team (Phase 3: Days 61-90)
- **All Team Members:** 20 FTE × 30 days = 600 person-days
- **Training time (20%):** 120 person-days
- **Productive time (80%):** 480 person-days

### Support Resources (Part-time)
- **Executive Sponsor:** 2 hours/week × 12 weeks = 24 hours
- **Security/Compliance:** 8 hours/month × 3 months = 24 hours
- **Legal:** 16 hours (contract review)
- **Finance:** 8 hours (ROI tracking)

### External Resources
- **Vendor Transition:** Vendor team cooperation (no cost)
- **Tool Vendor Support:** Included in licensing
- **External Consultant (optional):** 40 hours @ $200/hr = $8,000
```

### Step 5: Budget Planning

**Program Budget Template:**
```markdown
## Program Budget

### AI Tools & Technology
- GitHub Copilot: 20 users × $39/mo × 3 mo = $2,340
- GPT-4 API: $500/month × 3 months = $1,500
- Infrastructure: $300/month × 3 months = $900
**Subtotal Technology:** $4,740

### Training & Enablement
- Training curriculum development: 80 hours @ $150/hr = $12,000
- Training delivery (workshops): $5,000
- Training materials and resources: $2,000
**Subtotal Training:** $19,000

### Transition & Knowledge Transfer
- Vendor knowledge transfer sessions: Included in contract
- Documentation sprint: 40 hours @ $100/hr = $4,000
- Parallel run costs (overlapping): $10,000
**Subtotal Transition:** $14,000

### Program Management
- Program Manager: 90 days @ $1,000/day = $90,000
- Change Manager: 45 days @ $800/day = $36,000
- Technical Lead: 30 days @ $1,200/day = $36,000
**Subtotal Management:** $162,000

### Contingency & Buffer
- Risk buffer (10%): $19,974
- Scope change reserve: $10,000
**Subtotal Contingency:** $29,974

**TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET: $229,714**

### Cost Avoidance (Savings)
- Vendor costs avoided (3 months): $120,000
- **Net Cost Year 1:** $109,714
- **Savings Year 1 (months 4-12):** $360,000
- **Year 1 ROI:** 228%
```

## Phase Gate Governance

### Phase Gate Purpose
- **Ensure readiness** before proceeding to next phase
- **Validate assumptions** and adjust plans
- **Obtain approvals** for continued investment
- **Identify and mitigate risks** early
- **Prevent costly mistakes** from proceeding when not ready

### Phase Gate Process

**1. Gate Preparation (1 week before)**
- Program Manager compiles evidence
- All deliverables finalized
- Metrics and data validated
- Stakeholder pre-briefings

**2. Gate Assessment (Gate day)**
- Criteria scorecard review
- Evidence presentation
- Stakeholder Q&A
- Risk review
- Decision discussion

**3. Gate Decision**
- **PASS:** Proceed to next phase as planned
- **CONDITIONAL PASS:** Proceed with specific conditions to address
- **DELAY:** Address critical gaps before proceeding
- **CANCEL:** Abort program (rare, but possible)

**4. Post-Gate Actions**
- Document decision and rationale
- Communicate to all stakeholders
- Update plan based on conditions or delays
- Kick off next phase

### Gate Criteria Examples

**Phase Gate 1 Criteria:**
```markdown
| Criterion | Weight | Target | Evidence Required |
|-----------|--------|--------|-------------------|
| Executive approval | 20% | Signed charter | Approval email/signature |
| Budget allocated | 20% | $[X] committed | Finance confirmation |
| Tools selected | 15% | 2+ options evaluated | Evaluation scorecard |
| Security cleared | 15% | No red flags | Security signoff |
| Team ready | 15% | 5 trained | Training completion % |
| Baseline metrics | 10% | Defined and measured | Metrics dashboard |
| Risk mitigation | 5% | Plans for top 5 risks | Risk register |

**Pass Criteria:** ≥85% weighted score, no individual criterion <50%
```

## Common Planning Pitfalls

### Pitfall 1: Unrealistic Timeline
**Problem:** Trying to do 90-day program in 60 days
**Why it fails:** Corners cut, quality suffers, team burns out
**How to avoid:** Use proven 30-60-90 framework, buffer for unknowns

### Pitfall 2: Insufficient Planning Time
**Problem:** Rushing into pilot without adequate preparation
**Why it fails:** Missing foundation, poor tool selection, team unready
**How to avoid:** Spend full 30 days on Phase 1, don't skip

### Pitfall 3: Vague Success Criteria
**Problem:** "Improve productivity" without specific targets
**Why it fails:** Can't measure success, stakeholders disagree on outcomes
**How to avoid:** Quantify everything (≥90% quality, 60% cost reduction, etc.)

### Pitfall 4: Ignoring Change Management
**Problem:** Treating as purely technical program
**Why it fails:** Team resistance, adoption failure, quality issues
**How to avoid:** Dedicate resources to training, communication, support

### Pitfall 5: No Risk Management
**Problem:** Assuming everything will go as planned
**Why it fails:** Surprises cause delays, cost overruns, failures
**How to avoid:** Identify risks early, mitigate proactively, monitor continuously

### Pitfall 6: Poor Stakeholder Management
**Problem:** Executives surprised by issues, Finance questions costs
**Why it fails:** Loss of support, budget challenges, program cancellation
**How to avoid:** Weekly reports, transparent communication, early escalation

### Pitfall 7: Inadequate Knowledge Transfer
**Problem:** Rushing vendor exit to save money
**Why it fails:** Critical knowledge lost, team struggles, quality drops
**How to avoid:** Allocate 4-6 weeks for thorough knowledge transfer

### Pitfall 8: Skipping Parallel Run
**Problem:** Cutting directly from vendor to AI
**Why it fails:** No validation, quality unknown, high risk
**How to avoid:** Minimum 3-4 week parallel run for comparison

## Program Planning Checklist

### Initial Planning
- [ ] Program charter drafted and approved
- [ ] Success criteria defined (quantified)
- [ ] Stakeholders identified and mapped
- [ ] Budget estimated and approved
- [ ] Timeline baselined (30-60-90 days)
- [ ] Risks identified (top 10)
- [ ] Governance structure defined

### Detailed Planning
- [ ] All milestones defined with dates
- [ ] Dependencies mapped
- [ ] Critical path identified
- [ ] Resources allocated (names, not just roles)
- [ ] Budget breakdown by category
- [ ] Phase gate criteria defined
- [ ] Communication plan complete

### Execution Preparation
- [ ] Tracking tools set up (dashboards, reports)
- [ ] Kickoff meeting scheduled
- [ ] Team roles and responsibilities clear
- [ ] Escalation paths defined
- [ ] Change control process established
- [ ] Quality standards documented
- [ ] Lessons learned process defined

## Tools and Templates

**Program Management Tools:**
- **Gantt Chart:** Microsoft Project, Monday.com, Asana
- **Kanban Board:** Jira, Trello, Linear
- **Dashboards:** Tableau, Looker, Excel
- **Communication:** Slack, Teams, Email
- **Documentation:** Confluence, Notion, Google Docs

**Essential Templates:**
- Program charter
- 30-60-90 day plan (Excel/Google Sheets)
- Weekly status report
- Phase gate assessment
- Risk register
- RACI matrix (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed)
- Milestone schedule
- Budget tracker

## Success Metrics

**Program Execution:**
- Timeline adherence: Within 2 weeks of 90-day plan
- Budget adherence: Within 10% of approved budget
- Deliverable completion: >95% on time and quality
- Phase gates: All passed (first time or conditional)

**Stakeholder Satisfaction:**
- Executive sponsor: ≥4/5 rating
- Team members: ≥4/5 rating
- Program team: ≥4/5 rating

**Business Outcomes:**
- Cost reduction: Achieved or exceeded target
- Productivity gain: Achieved or exceeded target
- Quality maintenance: ≥95% of baseline
- ROI: Positive in Year 1

This skill ensures programs are properly planned, resourced, and governed for maximum success probability.

Files in this skill

  • README.md19 KB
  • ai-terminology.skill.md8.1 KB
  • api-integration.skill.md17.6 KB
  • change-management.skill.md17.2 KB
  • code-examples.skill.md10.8 KB
  • data-sovereignty.skill.md17.8 KB
  • data-visualization.skill.md9.8 KB
  • document-structure.skill.md12.4 KB
  • financial-modeling.skill.md10 KB
  • hardware-sizing.skill.md13.7 KB
  • legal-compliance.skill.md14.8 KB
  • local-ai-deployment.skill.md13.2 KB
  • metrics-analytics.skill.md12.3 KB
  • milestone-tracking.skill.md13.7 KB
  • mlops-operations.skill.md17.5 KB
  • open-source-licensing.skill.md13.8 KB
  • production-readiness.skill.md11.1 KB
  • program-planning.skill.md15 KB
  • risk-assessment.skill.md17.3 KB
  • stakeholder-management.skill.md15.2 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.